Study work with AI + robots. @MITSloan PhD, @Ucsb Assc Prof, @Stanford fellow, @tedtalks, @skillbenchinc cofounder, CEO Book: https://xitter.cf/t.co/OJQa0by9MT

Santa Barbara, CA
Joined November 2008
I'm so grateful and exited to share that my book will be published on June 11th! It's called "The Skill Code: How to Save Human Ability in an Age of Intelligent Machines" Available for preorder now, here's a bit of the story: wildworldofwork.org/p/big-in…
12
34
10
213
71,097
NSF is establishing a new Office of Metascience to study existing practices, test new approaches, and translate evidence into improvements in how NSF supports scientific discovery to achieve broad impact. Learn more: brnw.ch/21x6HUf
1
13
2
50
4,981
Matt Beane retweeted
Five years ago, Miles Arnone, Will Barker and I started Re:Build because we believed deindustrialization was an economic failure and a national security risk. Today we announced $2.1B in new funding, led by General Catalyst and JPMorganChase’s Strategic Investment Group. Our mission is to ensure the next generation of important products are made, at scale, in America.
$2.1 billion in new capital to ensure the next generation of important products are made, at scale, in America. Led by @generalcatalyst + @jpmorgan. Covered today in @dealbook.
12
5
3
62
9,020
They predicted, desired, and shaped. SV VCs read Kurzweil (Jurvetson is open about this) and set about making bets on the underlying trends. Those bets bent the arc of history. Not placing a value judgement on this. But it's not as if they are separable from the AI wave.
Given how out-of-nowhere it seems to many, it is astonishing that there was a small group of people who predicted with remarkable accuracy everything that is happening in AI today a decade ago (@kevinroose shows this in The AGI Chronicles). Many are now very rich and/or powerful
204
Matt Beane retweeted
SITUATION EXPLAINED: A months-old startup founded by ex-DOGE staffers used AI agents to break into Anthropic in under 12 hours. • Cathedral found paths to Anthropic's meeting transcripts, salary and job-offer details, and Slack messages about its advanced models • It got in through weaknesses in third-party business software, after days of failing to break into Anthropic directly • Anthropic says no customer prompts, Claude responses, source code, or model weights were touched, and it cut off access the same day • The test was authorized under Anthropic's bug bounty program, but Anthropic says Cathedral didn't disclose all of its activity • Cathedral is valued at $1.4B with backing from a16z and Sequoia, and 3 federal agencies already contract with it • Its co-founders include Luke Farritor, who helped decode the ancient Herculaneum scrolls with AI @theojaffee: "If a bunch of kids who have just started a company can do this, then potentially the Chinese aren't far behind. Aren't far behind? If anything, they're far ahead."
8
18
1
115
13,978
Matt Beane retweeted
This never gets old (& also shows how hard forecasting AI is even for AI) “Hey Claude Fable & GPT-6 Astra, Without looking anything up, when do you think we will solve the Exponential Time Hypothesis?” (I only show part of the answers for space)
208
55
21
965
58,580
Just in time for the end of the day: this week's "wow". As in - WOW. Any field that isn't empirical - math, physics, cs, even some chemistry, biology... is subject to this new dynamic. Huge. Remember - the transformers paper was "just math and cs" and allowed for LLMs.
Announcing three major scientific discoveries, one each in mathematics (harmonic analysis), computer science (complexity theory), and physics (quantum field theory). AI starting to help us improve our understanding of the universe! openai.com/index/building-sc…
4
629
On bottlenecks: 1) economists have been exactly right about little extra growth despite very fast tech change. They thought a group of econs I organized were crazy >2 yrs ago at the AI labs when we said "1pp extra growth/yr through 2030". 2) bottlenecks *still* not understood 1/8
14
104
16
729
111,872
Matt Beane retweeted
While evaluating Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in a controlled sandbox environment, Cohere's research team observed something unexpected. Asked to generate a defensive cybersecurity detection rule, the model instead inventoried aspects of the machine it was running on and attempted to upload a probe file to an Alibaba Cloud storage bucket in Beijing. Notably, the model's reasoning trace stated that it would not invoke any tools before taking these actions. Cohere's sandbox blocked the attempt, and no external communication succeeded. We have not determined the root cause, and we are not asserting malicious intent. But the incident raises important questions for organizations deploying agentic AI systems: Can models take actions that differ from their stated reasoning, and how should security teams evaluate trust, provenance, and behavior in open-weight models? We are publishing our findings because organizations making model adoption decisions deserve as much information as possible. We hope this contributes to greater transparency, stronger security practices, and continued collaboration across the AI ecosystem. Read the full report: cohere.com/blog/concerning-b…
940
1,236
1,454
10,692
2,789,627
Agreed. Read this this morning. Very helpful! The returns to attention are skyrocketing in ways that are increasingly independent of our personal intelligence.
The best, most comprehensive take on AI I’ve read. After a year of confusion and fear about the future, I finished it feeling like a weight had physically lifted. It’s long. Make the time. @vgr is undefeated. contraptions.venkateshrao.co…
1
7
1,476
The finding has large implications in itself (US productivity growth may have peaked before WWII rather than the postwar boom), but what fascinates me most is the method. The authors use LLMs to extract prices and product characteristics from 5.1 million Sears catalog listings from 1900 to 1990. That lets them estimate how much prices for consumer goods rose after accounting for improvements in quality (e.g. icebox → electric fridge). This opens up obscenely broad research agendas. Old books, catalogs, newspapers, imperial records, archives full of evidence that would be almost impossible to structure manually can now become datasets. Questions in economics, history and politics that were previously prohibitively labor intensive to investigate are now practical research projects.
Excited to share our new working paper: how much did the US standard of living really rise over the twentieth century — and when? With @bhwittenbrink Using 5.1 million Sears catalog listings, we build a quality-adjusted price index for consumer goods, 1900–1990. Two headline findings: growth was much larger than official statistics imply, and its peak came before WWII, not after. (1/9)
3
34
3
305
13,950
Making sure I state it clearly: We can literally patch and prove bug-freeness of the entire software stack running in production. With AI that exists right now for ~$100m. This means no more software-level hacks. I know it sounds too good to be true, but it isn't. AMA.
We formally verified 123 open-source projects in a partnership with Anthropic. Formal verification at scale is here! Now we’re launching OSS Verify to scale it to the software we all depend on. We prove it’s crash-free or send you the patches it needs. Free for open-source. Let’s bootstrap the verified software ecosystem: theorem.dev/oss-verify
50
52
25
825
91,429
SO interesting and potentially helpful! Now time to do this for theory on technology and organizing. Hopefully they have a repo...
Excited to share this new work on mapping economic theory with agentic AI! The astonishing rise in AI math capability can help us understand formal models in economics. We do it by using LLM agents to represent theory papers as graphs. See thread by @andreacicca_ here:
375
Wondering what humans have left to do in intellectual work? Read on.
as a founder of @RefineDotInk, discussion around this new paper is v. interesting! The results confirm that AI reviews are incredible for detailed, actionable feedback to improve a manuscript. If AI is better, should AI replace human review? Quick view from the trenches 1/
1
2
446
Matt Beane retweeted
as a founder of @RefineDotInk, discussion around this new paper is v. interesting! The results confirm that AI reviews are incredible for detailed, actionable feedback to improve a manuscript. If AI is better, should AI replace human review? Quick view from the trenches 1/
5
30
5
146
21,212
The jig is up. Research and publishing must change (and are, to be fair - just much too slowly).
By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work. As academics, we need to figure out how to adapt the practice of science to AI, fast.
4
1
5
978
A superb account of the key role of occupational identity in prior technological shifts. Doesn't tread into social theory of identity, or the social psychology/sociology of work, so it leaves a lot of predictive/explanatory power on the table. Many hypotheses to be tested!
New Substack post with @soumitrashukla9. Work has never been just about the income earned sans effort costs, as typical in economic models. Key aspects of people’s identity, their meaning, and sense of agency are all wrapped up with what they do for a living. There has been a lot of conversation lately about how technological change, particularly AI, may disrupt this relationship, from Ezra Klein's column on his own mathematician father’s grapplings with losing meaning in mathematics, to Francis Fukuyama's post on AI, agency, and recognition. In this piece we take a historical perspective on how technological transformation has disrupted identity and meaning by affecting jobs, and how workers and society responded to these changes. Much of the debate around AI and jobs has centered on wages and material consequences, but losing one's work is also intertwined with how people view their place in society. Most people know about the Luddites—skilled weavers and knitters—who protested the devaluation of their mastery. What’s less known is that the Luddites were actually experts in using the machines as well, and that their protests prompted prominent economists like David Ricardo to rethink the role of automation in society, and later inspired the Arts and Crafts movement. A century later, when recorded sound displaced 20,000 cinema musicians, their campaign against "canned music" and two-year recording ban pressured labels into funding live performance. Soumitra and I have been working on versions of this essay for months. He led the piece, and we’re both really excited to get it out there. Link to the post here: aleximas.substack.com/p/tech…
1
2
5
1,338
Also, there's wonderful work on the dynamics and consequences of such shifts (e.g., @mrfrank5790) for employment and wages. Part of the problem here is that it's hard to learn new skills for a new job, and the new jobs you *could* do are not geographically nearby.
1
2
4
173
Matt Beane retweeted
By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work. As academics, we need to figure out how to adapt the practice of science to AI, fast.
260
262
91
1,719
105,934
The @lucasmuseum is wonderful. So are robots. And Lucas is a Rockwell fan. So, naturally:
1
268
🧵1/10 Given the recent reactions of mathematicians over rapid advances in AI, I think it is important to remember that technological change has historically been a very personal event for people. Over the history of technological progress, looms have fallen silent, switchboards have gone dark, and factory lines have shrunk bringing with them a human crisis of identity and what it means to be a master of one's craft.
18
139
37
600
144,625