Pat Condell retweeted
Ukraine and Russia had a deal to end the war six weeks after it started.
Initialed. Signed. Ready.
Ceasefire. Limited forces. Autonomy for Donbas. Crimea put off. Shelling stops.
Then Boris Johnson flew in.
He told Zelensky to walk away.
“This isn’t about your problems. It’s about weakening Russia. We’ll support you as long as it takes.”
Not a theory.
The Ukrainian negotiator who was in the room later said it himself.
The war could have stopped.
Instead they chose more of it.
Pat Condell retweeted
The British state has functionally outlawed being an Englishman in public, framed as combatting anti social behaviour. Ironically, it almost guarantees a further withdrawal from social behaviour.
I note that there are no defences of:
-joie de vivre
-savoir faire
As such, we might now expect rehabilitative orders and sentences of up to 2 years for being outdoors, pint in hand, and attempting to have a chat with a stranger (being an Englishman).
You can all but guarantee these powers will be abused. On 4th October 2026 we saw abuse of similar in Gosport; Section 34 dispersal orders (created by the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014) gives the police and PCSOs the power to direct individuals to leave a designated area for up to 48 hours – designed for vagrants, rough sleepers and drunks/crackheads in public spaces. In Gosport, those powers were applied to the entirety of the area (population 82,000). Essentially giving police the power to move an entire town along, from their own residences.
We haven’t seen such an abuse of legislation beyond its intended purpose since the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 – designed to contain remote airport and hospital disease outbreaks – was used to place the entirety of Britain under house arrest (lockdown, of 2020).
Start with the beard and pyjamas crowd. Get them all out of our country. They’ve never belonged here and they never will.
Pat Condell retweeted
Reform's deputy leader Richard Tice has just stated - 'the simple fact is the British people want net zero immigration.'
I fundamentally disagree - millions more must leave than enter. That is what our people want.
The hour is far too late for net zero.
Millions must go.
Pat Condell retweeted
This is the post Reform just deleted...
The British people do NOT want 'net zero' immigration, @TiceRichard.
We want millions gone.
Nigel’s arrogance has come back to bite him. He has alienated too many people who want the kind of radical policies he simply doesn’t believe in. Mass remigration. Mass deportation. Millions must go. If Reform won’t put that at the centre of their manifesto they deserve to lose.
Nigel Farage urges Restore voters to 'come back to us' amid poll drop and snap election fears
gbnews.com/politics/nigel-fa…
Pat Condell retweeted
Under Labour, things are not going to get any better. You cannot tax your way to prosperity. Small fixes and helping hands don't change the fact that the fundamentals are broken, and are getting worse all the time. Redistributive policies make you poorer in the long run. An increase in minimum wage mean prices go up and fewer people are employed.
Meanwhile, taxes, red tape and regulation deter anyone from starting or expanding businesses. If being bigger and more successful means more administrative burden and more tax, there is no incentive to do better. Not forgetting that if energy is expensive then everything is expensive, and the more expensive it is, the less competitive we are. You can't export things if you can't afford to make them.
This is why the economy is stagnating. Our economic woes are self-inflicted. We are stifling our own growth, making infrastructure more expensive, and killing jobs in the process. As such, there is no recovery without addressing the fundamentals. Britain is over taxed, over regulated, over its head in debt, and more of the same is only going to make matters even worse.
You could have said this at any point in the last twenty five years. Britain cannot afford its spending, much less its welfare burden. The reason the country is so dilapidated is because we have hollowed out state capacity in order to maintain our lavish welfare systems. We cannot go on as we are without some major reforms. Reforms that will be painful.
I believe we are rapidly reaching a crunch point at which all of these factors converge - where we can't borrow any more and the economy cannot sustain our expectations of government. We are set to be much poorer - and colder.
Fixing this will require a complete reassessment of every base assumption of the last two decades. You cannot power a first world economy with windmills. We cannot have a quarter of the workforce claiming benefits. We cannot treat every ailment as a disability. We can't keep punishing innovation with regulation and tax. We cannot keep asset stripping the armed forces to pay for welfare. We cannot afford feed and cloth every hapless biped who rocks up with their hand out.
This, though is the central division in our politics. Labour would have us carry on as we are. Burnham will use out money to buy off his client groups, while keeping us shackled to the EU so that there can be no reform. We simply bleed out over the next decade.
This is what @robertjenrick's latest measures are designed to address. What Reform neglects to state, though, is that much of Jenrick's agenda puts us on a collision course with the EU because much of the Brexit deal is centred on non-regression. We are locked in to the status quo, just as we were as members of the EU. As such, the Brexit question was never satisfactorily resolved.
Burnham wants us to remain shackled to this corpse. We only need look to the rapid deindustrialisation of Germany to see how that pans out. Climate rules are destroying the European car industry - the beneficiary of which is China.
Britain can only reindustrialise if we break from the dogmas of EU. This is what made it necessary to leave in the first place. Since Brexit though, little has been done. We could have repealed the galaxy of EU directives that make everything more expensive and inefficient - but we didn't. The Westminster blob simply doesn't have the will to put us on the right track. Brexit was kicked into the long grass.
To a point, it's understandable. There isn't a popular consensus for making many of the necessary reforms. The dogmas are too deeply entrenched - both in politics and the wider population. The Tory party itself was and is captured by the green blob, and Kemi Badenoch remarked only as week that "of course we still need renewables". The Westminster mindset is anti-growth and anti-prosperity.
That's ultimately the result of thirty years of green propaganda. They will oppose any reform that liberates the economy. Until this is addressed, we are circling the drain, in a state of badly managed decline until we can barely even keep the lights on, and Britain finds itself bankrupt and defenceless.
What’s interesting about Jenrick's reform measures is that they mainly remove artificial inhibitors on growth. Britain’s stagnation is wholly self-inflicted (with a little help from the EU. We’d be a lot better off even even half of them were implemented, but the left would fight to the death to stop any one of them being implemented.
That is the fundamental division in our politics now. It is continuity Brexit politics, up against a ruling class that will tolerate no deviation from the status quo. As @SebMilbank put it this morning, "Much of this is because they have no actual vision of the nation's future, beyond an end of history secular humanist internationalism". Moreover, conceding the need for reform means admitting they've been wrong about absolutely everything for the last half century.
A communism-by-stealth Fabian who is also a deeply trivial and unserious person is not a good mix for a prime minister. Our border is wide open to an invasion of predatory, parasitic and violent foreign men, and Burnham is talking about baked beans. Unforgivable.
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham has announced five "everyday fixes" ahead of the Budget
1. Carer's Allowance will be changed so carers no longer lose their entire benefit when they earn over the limit - instead, their support will reduce by £1 for every extra £1 they earn
2. Import tariffs will be removed on more than 100 products, including baked beans, chocolate and gherkins, to save households up to £21 on their food shop a year
3. Tax-free mileage rates for workers using their own cars will be made permanent at 55p per mile for the first 10,000 miles, with the rate for additional miles rising from 25p to 35p
4. Parental pay will be extended to over 150,000 more parents a year, including self-employed fathers and partners
5. Hundreds more Post Office drop boxes will be rolled out to save people queueing at branches
Pat Condell retweeted
Today in Wexford, Ireland takes a man to court for a sign.
Not a riot. Not a punch. A sign.
His name is Hugh Fagan. He sits on a bench in the town square with his homemade signs and his headphones on.
Here's the case. 👇
It’s been a memorable 4 years
Four years ago today, Elon Musk bought Twitter.
Liberals lost their minds because they knew they were losing control of their ability to shape the narrative.
Today, X is the #1 source of news in the world and it’s the legacy "news" media on life support.
Pat Condell retweeted
WE WILL NEVER GIVE UP THE FIGHT
This is what happened in Brazil’s election - and this is just the beginning.
Share this video👇
We all saw the Democrats get away with stealing the 2020 US presidential election when Trump was ahead. Why wouldn’t the Brazilian communists try the same thing? I won’t be surprised if it happens to Le Pen in France as well. The free world is in a fight for its life.
Pat Condell retweeted
1. I'm now in the courtroom at Southwark Crown Court for the trial of Tommy Robinson. I am here, to my own surprise, because until Thursday I was banned from the UK by the Home Office! I received a visa on Thursday, so I'm here to live-tweet.
Pat Condell retweeted
You paid to end slavery. 🇬🇧
Britain borrowed twenty million pounds to free 800,000 people in 1833. 💷
The last of it was paid off in 2015. Your taxes. Your parents’. Your grandparents’. 👨👩👧
Then sixty years of warships hunting slave ships. 150,000 people freed. ⚓
Proudofus.uk
Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧
Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
Pat Condell retweeted
Back in May, British PM Keir Starmer ordered the Home Office to ban me from reporting in the UK.
I sued them, and the day before they had to file their defence, they blinked and let me back in.
Starmer’s gone and I’m back. Funny how things go sometimes.
Pat Condell retweeted
Replying to @PeterBleksley
@PeterBleksley, the way you spoke to @Alexarmstrong was disgusting. I was genuinely taken aback.
If the question was whether he would fight here, on British soil, to protect this country’s women and children from men who mean them harm, I suspect the answer would be yes.
But calling a 35-year-old man a “coward” because he doesn’t want to be sent abroad to kill other young men at the behest of a government that has spent much of his life treating him like shit? How dare you?
Young white men and boys are repeatedly told they’re privileged, toxic and the source of every problem in the world since the 1700s. Veterans and their families are left fighting for support. Then, when the government wants soldiers, these same young men are expected to fall into line and go off and die for the goverments banker mates.
At 35, the majority of thier lives theyve been told they’re everything wrong with Britain - they're not even allowed to call themselves "British" or wave their own flag without being abused and insulted - now they're called "cowards" for questioning whether they owe its politicians their lives.
Utterly disgusting. You owe Alex an apology.
A heated GB News debate between Peter Bleksley and @Alexarmstrong asked whether young people should go to war for Britain when the government has done nothing for them. I stand with Alex on this one. Why should anyone be expected to fight for a country that has failed them?.
It's easy for old men to bluster about war when they won't have to fight. Why should young British men fight wars abroad when the enemy is already here preying on women and children? Mobilise them against the invaders first and you might see a different attitude.
‘I am utterly DISGUSTED by your rampant, pathetic cowardice.’
Former Metropolitan Police detective Peter Bleksley BLASTS @alexarmstrong after he suggested he wouldn’t fight for his country.
























