Mint Anything, Own Everything | Devs: https://nitter.gq/t.co/DBr3rhMWwE | Support: @RelayX_Support | Links đ https://nitter.gq/t.co/EQSms1mTHY
Joined April 2019
- Tweets4K
- Following1.4K
- Followers8.1K
- Likes3.6K
Acktually, you just need BSV to pump
The amount of energy necessary to successfully hijack the #Bitcoin network is far beyond the reach of any single organization or nation-state. Since the Bitcoin network consensus rules cannot be unilaterally changed, it is most likely that all players will simply adapt to its rules. As the old adage says: "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." Clip from WiM314 w/ @saylor
Instead of innocent until proven guilty
The new policy from the fake BSV association is seizure until proven innocent
Well presumably the aim would be to reduce cost - so if thereâs some disruption to the network that seems like it may be illegal activity then there are two options:
1. Act immediately to prevent further disruption, and take on the risk of BSVA being sued by the entity causing it, perhaps having to pay this entity damages is they were doing nothing wrong as decided by a court of law.
2. Do nothing, leaving the businesses who built on BSV with an unstable network. Sue the entity for disruption. Eventually a court may agree, then it seizes the assets of the entity causing the trouble which stops them from continuing. By that time most businesses will have perhaps found other tech to build on or have gone bankrupt.
Itâs not up to me, but Iâd pick 1.
Both options are idiotic
How about you just build a business that still profits despite network disruptions
Instead of trying to change the network
Imagine blaming the network for your business incompetence
Well presumably the aim would be to reduce cost - so if thereâs some disruption to the network that seems like it may be illegal activity then there are two options:
1. Act immediately to prevent further disruption, and take on the risk of BSVA being sued by the entity causing it, perhaps having to pay this entity damages is they were doing nothing wrong as decided by a court of law.
2. Do nothing, leaving the businesses who built on BSV with an unstable network. Sue the entity for disruption. Eventually a court may agree, then it seizes the assets of the entity causing the trouble which stops them from continuing. By that time most businesses will have perhaps found other tech to build on or have gone bankrupt.
Itâs not up to me, but Iâd pick 1.
BSV ASS is not in the whitepaper
Trolls
đŁ JUST IN: The @BSV_Assn is thrilled to announce the launch of the Network Access Rules (NAR), which govern the relationship between the Association and nodes on the BSV Network.
Dive into details here: hubs.la/Q02lckZT0
If you have coins why would you care or be bitter about being fired
It's ex-employees like @shadders333, who hate Craig Wright for firing them, as to why there are so many doctored / altered versions of documents submitted to the Court as evidence. This is evidence of other people's wrongdoing. Not evidence that Craig is a fraud.
Must be really broke to believe this yet still take the paycheck for multiple years pretending was making terranode
unavailable
2
10
1,153
