
CEO @thetara_group, Sr Advisor @TargetSmart, former @HowardU, @claritycampaign, @ncec1948, @SEIULocal500. DM inquiries
Washington, DC
Joined March 2009
- Tweets24.4K
- Following994
- Followers113K
- Likes62.2K
Pinned Tweet
I'll be writing more about the battleground states soon, but I started with Arizona, as I believe there's lots for Dems to learn open.substack.com/pub/tombon…
Based on current race margins, GOPs would have had to swing 121,965 votes across 6 states to hold on to a 50/50 Senate. However, if Dems swung 92,324 votes across 4 states, they would have a 60/40 majority in the chamber.
The highest turnout county in the MS Senate race was Humphreys, with total turnout at 99% of 2024 turnout.
The first Black man to register to vote in the county since Reconstruction, Rev. George Lee, was murdered by white supremacists, angry at his voter registration work.
When talking about the early vote data in TX over the past week I often noted that GOPs were going into election day in a deeper hole than past elections. Who would've predicted the hole was so deep that Talarico could've literally not won a single vote on Eday and still win?
Tom Bonier retweeted
So I sat down with @tbonier today to dive into the data about what is turning out to be our best election performance in 52 years. Enjoy peeps. We did a lot of good, and the country is far better off today:👇
open.substack.com/pub/simonw…
Tom Bonier retweeted
“Voters of color took a stand in this election, a stand to protect their future.” 🇺🇸
New in @TIME: @tbonier and @SimonWDC find Hispanic and Black voters turned out big and swung back to Democrats, including a 50-point swing in Texas’s Webb County.
time.com/article/2026/11/04/…
Looking at the 8 Dem Senate flips (yes, I'm including MS, and excluding AK due to weird county/borough data), there is a clear pattern of higher turnout in Black/Hispanic/Dem counties and lower in white/GOP. Of course, persuasion was also a huge part of these flips.
Tom Bonier retweeted
Tuesday wasn't about electing DSA candidates or Blue Dog candidates. It was about voters electing candidates who actually give a $&%# about the fact that everything is too expensive.
(Which is why this wave was actually about electing pro-worker and union candidates.)
I'm sure this person was as scandalized by Rob Sand speaking Norwegian as she apparently was by El Sayed saying a few words in Arabic and Ilhan Omar speaking Somali. Right?
Olivia Reingold: I’m going to have the Free Press’ worst take on El Sayed’s victory.
Maya Sulkin: Hold my Manischewitz…
The entire premise of this post is abhorrent but also: How is saying six words in Arabic, three of which WERE HIS NAME “giving his victory speech in Arabic”?
The fight against antisemitism has a racism problem. I wonder if that has anything to do with why it’s not working.
Tom Bonier retweeted
Give Stacey Abrams her flowers.
Replying to @tbonier
Second, I always beg people to not use exit polls to assess turnout. Here's an example of why. The exits completely missed the Black turnout surge in GA. They will update and reweight the exits with this data, but you cannot use exits as a primary turnout source.
Lots of thoughts on this, I'm thankful that Bernard shared this (and that GA releases full vote history so quickly).
First, this proves (in GA, for now) what we believed to be the case, Black and Latino voters turned out in large numbers. White (likely GOPs) did not.
Tom Bonier retweeted
If you wake up this morning and see the surge of black voters across the Deep South and the bold response of Latinos who came out despite the threats, and the presidential level participation of young folks, and conclude that the scale of our victory was solely because “we had the discipline to stay on message about kitchen table issues” - you should not be given a dime of our ActBlue donations for your guaranteed future mediocre strategies.
That was a rights based surge. A democracy surge. Gas prices, irrational tariffs, and broad cost of living played a huge role. But we cannot ignore what animated the souls of our surge voters. And we absolutely cannot continue to ignore corruption as an issue even within our own Party “until the polls catch up”
For some reason, GOPs seem to be circling the wagons around the false notion that their voters turned out at a high rate in this election. I charted turnout in Senate states by 20 pt ranges of Dem support. The most Dem counties were closest to 2024 turnout, the most GOP were not.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
The biggest gap between turnout (as a share of 2024 turnout) in majority Black counties vs majority non-Hispanic white counties was in Missippi, 13.6 pts, but the Black counties outperformed the white counties in every state we've analyzed.
With many votes yet to be reported, 1 county in TX has surpassed its total 2024 turnout (Culberson) and many are approaching that threshold.
I think we all will have our share of "I told you so" to deliver, but one I am proud of is, when we recorded this on Oct 9th and @harrisonjaime asked for my Senate upset pick and I chose @scott_colom. I believe he is going to win when all the votes are counted! youtu.be/FVw0xwFJOvg?t=1869
Ohh... I also called Jeff Van Drew as my House upset pick. I have to admit, that was mostly me being petty and wishcasting, but I'll take it.
Also on Oct. 9th, credit to @GregTSargent for working with us on this piece, as far as I know the first piece of this cycle to grasp the looming Hispanic wave that drove so much of what we saw happen last night. newrepublic.com/article/2164…




















