
Orlandoan, daughter of working class immigrants and @UCF grad elected to serve in the FL House. Working for you, fighting for us. she/her #OnwardWithAnna
Orlando, FL
Joined July 2017
- Tweets84K
- Following6.8K
- Followers87.4K
- Likes113K
This is the story of my family, and of my Mom -- who we lost to cancer when I was 13 years old. Her courage and resilience inspires me to be brave, and to fight for Florida families. Her story hasn't ended, but it’s up to us to write the next chapter. We start in November. #HD47
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
This is outrageous. Doral officials are blocking councilwoman Maureen Porras from introducing an agenda item to discuss & reconsider the city’s participation in its 287g program, establishing police collaboration w/ ICE. They’re doing this in contradiction w/ city charter rules.
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
BREAKING:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrat Darren Soto wins reelection to U.S. House in Florida's 9th Congressional District.
Another Republican dummymander.
Kamlager-Dove on Hegseth Impeachment: We knew that this vote was coming, so people should have gotten their raggedy selves up these steps to vote. There is no reason why we should have lost this vote because of attendance issues.
You know this man should not be in this position. That’s why he got up at 8 o’clock in the morning with his sorry self to plead to the American people.
So shame on folks who are not here. Because these people lost. They lost, and they still found a way to show up to table this bill. Shameful.
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
RFK Jr.’s worst nightmare… not just one, but two Democratic doctors in the senate 💅🏾
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
First Freshmen Senator selfie! Couldn’t ask for a better team.
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
This kind of behind-the-scenes transparency is a good example of millennial leadership in action.
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
Florida has 29 poor, largely rural counties classified as "fiscally constrained."
These counties will likely need a bailout from the rest of the state as a result of Amendment 3, which will decimate their already-thin tax bases.
Amendment 3 passed in all but one of them.
Join us for a power hour centered on the basics surrounding Amendment 3. What are the known impacts, what will the State Legislature and Governor do for implementation, + how can you get involved?
mobilize.us/annaforflorida/e…
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
A whole bunch of local governments in Florida are basically about to implode and become entirely dependent on transfers from state government. An incredible unforced error, and one endorsed by Republicans, in the only large US state where they haven't yet lost it all.
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
Florida Department of Law Enforcement is trying to backdoor a new rule that would require cities to collect immigration information from individuals that their police departments come into contact with.
flrules.org/gateway/RuleNo.a…
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
Democrats came within five points of flipping the Florida House of Representatives.
HD 70 would have been the 61st seat in the 120-member chamber.
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
You are the sitting Vice President, not a podcast host. All of the issues you listed are a you problem.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Rep. Anna V. Eskamani, PhD 🔨 retweeted
Our Florida: What's Next nitter.gq/i/broadcasts/2BlLPELPm…







































