Pinned Tweet
My book is out today. Huzzah! penguinrandomhouse.com/books…
bookshop.org/p/books/the-bre…
Stephen Miller last night at the CPAC gala in the Mar-a-Lago Führerbunker. (With German and Korean translations.)
Kurt Andersen retweeted
This is the final Cook Political Report rating pre election. Dems won every "Likely D "seat. They won every toss up seat. They won or are ahead in 7 of the 18 "Lean R"'s, they won 7 of the 17 ""Likely R". Dems won all their likely or safe seats, Dems also picked up 2 "solid" R seats.
How had I not been informed that S.C. Senator-elect Annie Andrews is so funny, performs bona fide satire! instagram.com/reel/DfXRjFNo_…
Yesterday, the day after his total repudiation by American voters made the stock market spike, he took m credit. Today he blamed the still-powerless Democrats for the stock market’s drop.
In every swingy (and impossible) state that definitely elected a Democratic Senator, the Democrat did 1% to 5% better than their bullish-seeming poll average.
TX Talarico 55-43
ME Jackson 54-46
MI El-Sayed 53-46
KS Hamilton 51-46
IA Turek 51-46
OH Brown 50-45
SC Andrews 51-47
When we show up AND give independents reasons to show up and vote for us.
Clever way for the rat who went to Yale to jump from the sinking ship. Avoids blaming Trump by name, but says Trump’s 2024 voters just voted for Democrats because of Trump/Republican policies — the war, the indifference to unaffordability, Israel-right-or-wrong.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
How big of a blue wave? At 1 am, with >95% of the votes counted, the (black) Democratic U.S. Senate candidate in Mississippi is ahead of the Republican incumbent by 28 votes.
How big of a blue wave? At 1 am, the (black) Democratic U.S. Senate candidate in Mississippi is ahead of the Republican incumbent by 28 votes.
On the left one of the brilliant yard signs in Omaha in 2024, and the brilliant sequel I saw all over the place in September.
I know that many of us never quite recovered from the @nytimes’s 2016 election-night forecast needle. But here’s the one right now about the Senate.
Stupid war that’s so far cost Americans $50 billion in direct government spending— plus $151 billion in higher gas prices that went directly to U.S. oil companies. "We” — the oil companies — “are making money like we've never made before. We're making a freaking fortune.”
Fantastic story: nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
And here’s his piece “Brain Bleed”: youtu.be/fnGUcEws1Ik?is=IMYo…
Kurt Andersen retweeted
Of course the debut issue of Spy magazine had Chris Elliott as the personification of jerks on it. Great start to a great publication. My recent @reason Interview w cofounder @KBAndersen: reason.com/podcast/2026/08/1…























