22. security researcher @Hashlock_, my sensei @0xSorryNotSorry, prev game designer https://xitter.cf/t.co/0ZHCkSxkRc

Joined May 2023
pessimist retweeted
When you wanted to report a bug and then saw the chain activity
1
1
11
1,767
If you - got a good night of sleep last night - have < 10 Slack notifications - were not besties with PagerDuty or OpsGenie - woke up and business as usual then thank your local security professional today
1
2
7
335
Open Machine Payments Turkiye is here! Exploring agentic payments through Turkey's existing payment service providers and e-commerce platforms, starting with an experimental @iyzico × @mpp adapter. Fully open source, payments tested in iyzico's sandbox: github.com/omptr/iyzico-mpp Payment layer first, more demos and fun experiments on the way :) Follow along: omptr.org
1
3
9
428
pessimist retweeted
php2shell - A tale of two PHP remote vulnerabilities: calif.io/php2shell
19
250
29
778
179,995
use @FibrousFinance for safe dex aggregation and swaps. evm contracts built by two security researchers, me and @natzuu9 🫡
Replying to @storming0x
We need more security people building projects. It's easier to prevent exploits than to detect them.
1
1
14
493
If I see your posts are AI-generated, I may unfollow. I'm tired of the slop.
5
2
1
91
2,014
So far in our posts, we’ve mostly shown the positive side of bug bounties people earning, transitioning, winning big. Today is different.If you’ve actually tried bug bounties, spent weeks or months on a target, submitted a solid finding and then got ghosted, lowballed, marked “won’t fix,” or stuck in endless mediation this one is for you. Today’s Security Voices features @marcohextor Marco has been around the blockchain for a long time. He doesn’t live on Twitter. He disappears for months, takes care of real life, his farm, chickens, soil and still comes back with serious findings.What stood out wasn’t just the technical work. It was how clearly he described the relationship problems between researchers and protocols.Some thoughts from the conversation 👇
2
3
22
759
Since 2024, I've been waiting for someone to build a bug bounty platform where projects can subscribe to AI security agents, or for existing bug bounty platforms to introduce a dedicated section for this or evolve in that direction. That's roughly how I picture the future of bug bounty. Proper automatic duplicate detection, with competent triage agents on both the project and platform sides. Projects are subscribed to the agentic security providers they trust, receiving regular updates. Maybe at some point (probably not that soon) we won't even need to meat-proxy between builder and security agents. In web3sec, @code4rena's Bot Races were the frontier example of this concept. It could make sense for open-source projects and much of crypto. If no one's interested in building it, I guess I'll do it myself at some point, and it won't involve all the bullshit bureaucratic steps and financial gatekeeping.
7
397
pessimist retweeted
if ai can do everything, please someone remove the “for you” tab on X
1
1
10
516
Replying to @MartinMarchev
This shouldn't happen. Rules must updated to prevent projects from even trying to do this. What's the point of a bounty program if preventing real exploits isn't rewarded? I'd go for a mediation
2
3
23
479
pessimist retweeted
Average payout over the time axis would be an interesting stat here...
We've recently crossed 10,000 paid vulnerability reports on @Immunefi! That's over 10,000 security issues found and reported before attackers could exploit them. And over 10,000 reasons why crypto is safer today, thanks to the work of our community of whitehat hackers around the world 🫶
1
1
68
i knew Veria Labs would cook something big like that, imo they are currently the best AI based security team. this finding deserves far more than $250k
Our AI found a bug that let anyone mint infinite XRP, with $94B at risk. It had been hiding in one of the most audited codebases in crypto for nearly a decade, and earned us the maximum $250K bounty. Here's how it went unnoticed, and how we found it.
1
9
496
its been an hour since i posted this and im just slowly processing how big $94B is
1
3
128
around 120 countries have lower GDP than $94B
2
86
founders consider the incentives again does your code attract more black hats or white hats?
Web3 bug bounties paid to researchers (estimates): - 2024: ~$24M - 2025: ~$14M - H1 2026: $13.45M One $3M payout was 38% of Q1 2026. 2025 hack losses: ~$3.4B. Bounties ~ 0.4% of that.
5
190
It feels like the cryptography doom narrative is made to attract attention and capital to privacy tech. I'm not complaining about this, I even wish we hadn't shifted our focus away from privacy at all, but I don't buy that the doom scenario isn't quite that imminent. Am I being schizo?
2
1
8
440
Since Web3 became a thing, the supply of Web3 security services has been scarce relative to demand because of how niche the field is and how difficult (and risky) it is to develop expertise. For the first time, I feel like we've entered a period where the supply of Web3 security exceeds demand. I don't think I need to spell out what that says about the quality of the current supply. I've been in this space for a long time, and unfortunately AI hasn't changed how silly the hacks are. Either it's not as effective as we think, or we’re failing to get quality AI security products to projects. If you don't believe me, see for yourself: rekt.news/
1
11
381
Keep in mind that I'm saying this as a longtime "AI believer". Back in 2020 (when I was 16), I was learning TensorFlow, object detection models, and a bunch of ML fundamentals, and I was convinced AI would play a huge role in the future. Besides going through tons of free resources, I also bought two paid course back then, so I have proof xD Udemy certificate nos: - UC-1985d755-c371-4942-ac69-206e6effcbec - UC-72e4a8ea-50eb-4016-a5eb-8a1ff793437b
1
2
71
Bug write-up coming soon. Both Immunefi and I put a lot of *sweat* into mediation, but they were deeply committed to not paying and running away from the platform. Happens.
7
199