I don't think we're going parabolic quite yet but if this turns out to be a mid-term bottom (cough cough)...PEPE might be the frog in the swamp to lead us forward.
Still think the trenches don't fully come back to life until someone in the looksmaxxing retarded set gets hauled away in cuffs for all the crime they commited on the chain that shall not be mentioned...👮
all this jawboning about going after the toxic kols just further strengthens the thesis for lindy memes.
doge ethereum:0x6982508145454ce325ddbe47a25d4ec3d2311933 et al
exhibit A
1
135
hard to get a read on what the "insiders" are thinking regarding pre-ipo mkts. Upnl is basically breakeven across large position holders ± 6m usdc. OI is fairly tiny (±140m). But that's probably due to fear of counterparty risk.
1
115
Consensus is flipping pretty fast that we're re-entering a bear mkt at support. Just need one more stunning bad news event that fails to make new lows for a really chunky relief rally. But yes, things really don't look great at the moment. Even privacy is getting tossed out with the used condoms this morning.
2
155
some of these auto shorts on chips have bigger returns than shitcoins on the downside. absolutely un-presidented.
137
people saying THAT couldn't happen to perp dexes should take a tiny look at how perp dexes are run.
human is still the weak link there too.
1
2
211
I was wrong on PAXG. I thought it still had value after that idiotic fusion FUD dumped it, but the real reason it can't bounce is the global rates hysteria. That part makes sense.
$INTC down nearly 30% in a day on soft guidance, after beating the quarter, is a buy with both hands. The problem is the bottom on these is rarely clear. Dip your toes in slowly and expect to pay more than the lows.
2
283
Elon sniping at CZ is just trolling. It shows zero concern for one of his own, and it doesn't make sense.
People are reading CZ's reply as a veiled threat. I'm not. He backed the Twitter takeover with $500M and he's still holding. That reads to me like an early backer asking for a little support, not leverage.
I get that some of you find it funny. Just remember it's only funny because it isn't happening to you.
Whatever you think of Binance, CZ has been a net positive for this industry. Most people have had good experiences there, and spot users haven't lost their holdings.
Perps are a different story. They've always been where hedgers meet speculators, and most 'serious' users treat them like insurance. When they get out of line, that's part of the deal.
CZ gave me a huge opportunity to profit over the years, so it feels right to show some support. Feels like nobody here remembers anything before 10/10.
3
15
2,018
the irony does not go unnoticed this is what agentic ai is doing to the internet
Truly hideous stuff. Quickly converging to the perfect form of infinitely shelf stable commodity paste of refined sugar / corn starch, fully hydrogenated palm oil and defatted soy protein, in a shell of synthetic flavors and dyes for the illusion of what you’re eating.
1
1
256
ODDLOTS: "Could you see a world where the deployers are the ones who get regulated vs the protocol (vs hyperliquid itself)?"
JEFF: "That's an astute way to frame it." (smirks)
1 week later ICE becomes a regulated deployer.
Nice foreshadowing if you saw it: youtu.be/GqJhyuIgd1s?t=3112&…
172
You know what's even more interesting? Druckenmiller's first ever visit to South Korea was last month.
Probably just there to get some beauty treatments and eat some spicy sundae, eh...
🤖 Made with AI
155
if taste is the residual error, there is no end. just ask the snowflake.
"taste" is just a catch-all word for things that ai can't do yet but humans can do.
in machine learning terms, "taste" is just the residual error that the model can't fully explain.
but with every new release that residual is rapidly approaching 0.
122
I want a CT titty committee to decide who gets to extract and who has to go to jail. This guy has been getting a pass for far too long.
Ansem, you’re not a voice for crypto.
You’re part of what’s dragging it down.
You have a massive platform and chose to promote Pump.fun and the casino economy built around it. Tokens using your own name, like $ANSEM, become another opportunity for insiders to cash out while your audience is left holding the bag.
And since you want to speak for the industry, let’s talk transparency. What happened to the $WIF treasury? Did you take funds from it? Did you broker a lifetime deal with Pump.fun? Put the agreements and financial incentives on the table.
Then explain how any of this moves crypto forward.
Where are the products? Where’s the lasting value? Where’s the thriving digital economy people were promised?
All I see is a revolving door of hype, extraction and followers fighting to exit before the next person.
You’re not onboarding people into crypto.
You’re introducing them to a casino, watching most of them lose, and calling it progress.
You’re holding the industry back while selling the damage as innovation.
2
2
253