Replying to @PatrickByrne @Midewontmiss
One polite option: "I value the exchange, but our starting assumptions differ so widely that aligning them would mean restarting from the basics. Happy to if you're up for it."
Or: "This might need a full reset on the fundamentals first. Let me know if you'd like to begin there."
Magda retweeted
Replying to @RiseOfAlberta
The GOAT. Gas, Oil, Agriculture, Timber. A very rich country.
Magda retweeted
Hey @PremierScottMoe let’s make a little wager on the CFL playoff game tomorrow. After the @BCLions win, I will give you a Lions jersey at our first official meeting.
In the very small chance the Riders win, I’ll reluctantly accept a @sskroughriders jersey from you.
Magda retweeted
If you go on the BC public servants subreddit, the main fear with the BC cons isn't even cuts, it's that Milobar will stop work from home
Really funny
Magda retweeted
LETS GO! 👏
SOGI has failed. It's caused so many divisions while starting to introduce inappropriate materials into schools.
Time for schools to return to the basic, and to have a true anti-bullying program, not ideological warfare.
Magda retweeted
The most dangerous thing about a prolonged power grid failure might not be the blackout itself.
It might be what happens during the first 24 hours when 300 million people suddenly realize that modern civilization has been doing almost everything for them.
And most of us haven't been paying attention.
Think about it.
We have people preparing for nuclear war who don't know where their home's water shutoff valve is.
People with enough ammunition to defend a small country who couldn't treat a minor infection.
People stockpiling three years of freeze-dried food who haven't considered how they'll cook it without electricity.
And millions of Americans whose first response to an emergency will be to Google "what to do when the internet stops working."
There's something almost poetic about that.
We've spent centuries conquering nature, automating our lives, and eliminating everyday inconveniences.
And in the process, we've become remarkably dependent on systems we barely understand.
Here's something most people get completely backward about survival.
They worry about food first.
But food isn't first.
Not even close.
Survival instructors have something called the Rule of Threes.
It's a rough guide, not a stopwatch, but it makes an important point:
You can survive approximately:
• 3 minutes without air.
• 3 hours without adequate protection in dangerously harsh conditions.
• 3 days without water, depending on circumstances.
• 3 weeks without food, under some conditions.
Notice what's missing?
Your Wi-Fi password.
Also missing: your cryptocurrency portfolio, your streaming subscriptions, and the emergency tactical tomahawk you bought after watching three episodes of The Walking Dead.
Now imagine the grid goes down tonight.
Not a neighborhood outage.
Not a transformer blowing during a thunderstorm.
A widespread, prolonged disruption affecting electricity, communications, transportation, and water distribution.
Within hours, depending on where you live, ordinary conveniences could become serious problems.
Gas stations need electricity to pump fuel.
Many municipal water systems rely on powered pumps and treatment equipment.
Cell towers depend on electricity and backup systems that have limits.
Grocery stores depend on refrigeration, electronic payments, and regular deliveries.
Even your toilet may eventually become a problem if water or sewer services are disrupted.
Yes.
The toilet.
It's remarkable how many people have elaborate plans for defending their homes against imaginary marauders but absolutely no plan for what happens when nobody can flush.
You can survive quite a while without Netflix.
Living in a house full of untreated human waste is considerably less entertaining.
And that's where things get interesting.
The first 24 hours of a major emergency aren't primarily about survival equipment.
They're about decisions.
Do you stay home or evacuate?
Do you have drinking water?
Can you account for your family?
Do you have a reliable source of information?
Do you understand which problems need immediate attention and which ones can wait?
Because panic has a fascinating ability to make otherwise intelligent people do spectacularly stupid things.
People drive into danger when staying put would be safer.
They burn through their phone batteries doomscrolling.
They open the freezer every fifteen minutes to check whether the frozen chicken is still frozen.
They rush to gas stations that are already out of fuel.
And they spend precious time worrying about problems that won't matter for another week while ignoring the ones that matter right now.
The most valuable survival skill might be the ability to stop, think, and prioritize.
Not particularly exciting, I know.
Nobody has ever made an action movie about a man calmly evaluating his household's drinking water inventory.
But perhaps someone should.
I'd watch it.
Here's another uncomfortable truth.
The person with the most supplies isn't necessarily the person most likely to handle a crisis well.
Consider two households.
Household A has a garage filled with tactical equipment, expensive survival gadgets, and enough canned food to open a small supermarket.
But nobody has practiced using the equipment.
Nobody has a family communication plan.
And nobody knows the neighbors.
Household B has a week's worth of basic supplies, a water plan, first-aid knowledge, a reliable flashlight, a battery-powered radio, and a family that has discussed what to do if the lights go out.
They've even talked with the people next door about helping one another.
Which household would you rather be in?
The answer should be obvious.
Yet the preparedness industry spends considerably more time selling us equipment than teaching us how to think.
And that's the problem.
We've confused owning survival gear with possessing survival skills.
We've confused stockpiling with resilience.
And we've confused imagining ourselves surviving the apocalypse with actually preparing to handle an emergency.
A while back, I watched a documentary about the Carrington Event, the enormous solar storm that struck Earth in 1859.
It got me thinking about what a comparable event could mean for today's electricity-dependent world.
And the more I researched, the more one realization kept coming back:
Most people don't need to become survivalists.
They need to become a little more self-reliant.
Learn how to secure clean drinking water.
Know how to manage without electricity.
Keep essential supplies on hand.
Understand basic first aid.
Have a plan for your family.
And perhaps most importantly, know a few people who might be willing to help when things go sideways.
Those ideas eventually became a book.
Apocalypse WOW: A Mostly Harmless Guide to Surviving the End of Everything.
It's a practical survival guide for ordinary people who would prefer not to die simply because civilization has decided to take an unscheduled vacation.
And it's built around a philosophy I call Prepared Optimism.
The idea is simple.
You don't prepare because you're certain everything is going to fall apart.
You prepare because you believe that, even if something goes wrong, you can figure out how to make things better.
That's optimism.
U With a backup plan.
And perhaps a manual can opener.
So here's my question. And I'd really like honest answers.
Forget your stockpiles for a moment.
Forget your generators, firearms, and survival gadgets.
If the power went out tonight and stayed out for 14 days, what's the ONE practical skill you wish you knew how to do—but currently don't?
Purify drinking water?
Administer first aid?
Repair basic equipment?
Cook without electricity?
Grow food?
Something else entirely?
I'm genuinely curious what people think their biggest knowledge gap is.
Because I suspect the answers might reveal something important.
We spend an extraordinary amount of time preparing to acquire things.
Maybe we should spend a little more time preparing to know things.
— T. Collins Webb
📖 Apocalypse WOW: A Mostly Harmless Guide to Surviving the End of Everything
Don't panic. Grab your towel.
Magda retweeted
"MEANINGLESS DECLARATIONS"!?
My fucking head is going to explode, here! I'm in absolute disbelief at how brazen he is with his lies!
Pierre Poilievre is REALLY committed to his role in leading the fake-conservative controlled opposition! Wow!
He's gaslighting us on a level that I'm having a really difficult time explaining. To say that he's massively downplaying this situation would be worse than an understatement.
Our government is aligning us with something that most Canadians would have difficulty comprehending. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how expansive this is.
Carney was part of a 2021 Trilateral Commission Taskforce to investigate "Global Capitalism in Transition", where they discussed much of what is being incorporated under this new EU alliance.
Pierre's Shadow Minister for Treasury Board, Stephanie Kusie, is a proud Trilateral Commission member. I would safely presume that she is familiar the Taskforce and the contents of their report.
The topics discussed by this Taskforce are the central nervous system of the new Canada-EU partnership.
- Net Zero 2050
- Global digital transition
Canada will be subjected to all of the EU's climate policies. We're already seeing this with the proposed carbon tariffs under CBAM, and nothing has even been finalized yet. The Taskforce specifically mentions CBAM in their report, and that it's "a starting point for conversions leading to a broader climate club."
The Taskforce openly talks about establishing "techno-democracies". They openly talk about how they're setting the agenda on these issues.
Canada and the EU are openly talking about streamlining digital credentials. We will surely be subjected to whatever policies the European Commission implements.
I am proposing that there is no conceivable way that the Conservative Party of Canada is unaware of this. I'm also proposing that they are intentionally obfuscating the details of the new Canada-EU partnership (by any name), and misleading Canadians about the scope, breadth, and seriousness of this partnership. I am proposing that they're aware of what's coming over the next few decades, and that their historical actions have shown that they, too, support this direction.
We NEED to be having this conversation. We are at the point where we can no longer afford to maintain the old belief that we can solve our problems by voting. We need to be honest with ourselves about what is happening and where we're being herded.
We all need to be pushing Poilievre HARD on this!! As hard as possible. As hard as we're pushing Carney. He's betraying our Nation the same way.































