Pinned Tweet
Amazing how exactly 144,000 Jews and exactly 12,000 from each tribe, free willed their way into getting sealed.
We're reaching the plowshares into AR-15s and pruning hooks into pigs blood territory.
Better get with it and prepare for what's coming.
Not gonna lie. @JoelWebbon sounds like a fhaguétte. Seriously. If I met him in person I'd assume he likes the frank and beans.
And now this limp wristed Gilligan is talking about civil war like he'd be doing anything other than hiding in his basement with his fellow circle jerkers.
"Elliot" Page will fair better than this fluffer when the projectiles fly.
Said what I said.
If you need an investment tip....stock up on pigs blood. Seriously. Could save your life and community.
IYKYK
Messianic Gentile retweeted
HEY, J.D. VANCE…
NOT ONE WORD ABOUT THE ISLAM/MARXIST REVOLUTION RAVAGING AMERICA??‼️
Palestine First just got elected and you’re bitching about Israel. You can’t make this stuff up.
Do you think Americans didn’t care about the Islamic takeover happening in real time or are we going to still just cry about Europe?
Thanks @AmyMek
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
We beat those demons! They wanted to mùrder babies up to 8 months. Idaho for the win!
Not today, satan!
This is what its like dealing with a minister of death. Read through and see who handles Gods word rightly.
I spend a lot of time contemplating which group has the most ridiculous theology. Is it the tulip derangement people? The torah (but not really) observant? Maybe the anti Trinitarians? Once I think I've finally come to a conclusion a preterist post and throws a wrench in the whole darn thing.
There are many people, especially that of the Torah (but not really) observant crowd who, like covenant theology, teach that the church is Israel. Their argument goes like this....
1) The new covenant in Jeremiah 31 is made only* with the house of Israel and the house of Judah.
2) The church, comprised of Gentile believers are included in the new covenant.
3) Therefore, the church is Israel.
In other words, since the new covenant is made with Israel, to be a part of the new covenant makes you Israel.
This might sound reasonable at first glance, but notice what Jeremiah does not say. He does not say "only." "Only" with the house of Israel and Judah.
***Side note: They make this argument because they want the church under Mosaic law. They understand that gentiles were never under the law of Moses. So, the end around to place the yoke of slavery upon the church is to make the church Israel. Once you make the church Israel, you've placed the church under Moses (according to their heresy).***
Beyond that, these folks fail to understand the fulfillment of the Jeremiah prophecy. We can likewise throw in Ezekiel 11 and 36 and God's promise to remove their stony hearts and give them hearts of flesh. Same new covenant promises without mentioning the new covenant.
Ezekiel 11 and 36 along with Jeremiah 31 have NOT yet been fulfilled! You cannot take Ezekiel and Jeremiah and apply them to the church when those prophecies/promises await a future (to us) fulfillment.
Ezekiel and Jeremiah are speaking about the time period when, in the words of Paul, "all Israel will be saved." This time period occurs after the fullness of the Gentiles comes in. It occurs after they say, "blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord."
Israel has NOT had their stony hearts removed and replaced with hearts of flesh. Israel has not reached the place where...
"They will not teach again, each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them.”
Israel is still in rebellion, rejecting their Messiah.
Yes, the new covenant has been inaugurated through the death and resurrection of Christ, but its application upon Israel is yet future. We, the church are members of the new covenant. Israel is not.
This... 👇
and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written,
“The Deliverer will come from Zion,
He will remove ungodliness from Jacob.”
“This is My covenant with them,
When I take away their sins.”
— Romans 11:26-27
...for Israel, has not yet occurred. 👆
You cannot take a passage about a yet future event with a specific group and apply it to the church which, as of this writing, has existed 2,000 years prior to its fulfillment.
We finally made it past everyone's opinion about Halloween season only to enter into everyone's opinion about Christmas season while on the eve of concluding the voting for the lesser of 2 evils is still evil season.
The reason Hebrews 4 and 11 tell us that Abraham and all the other believers throughout the old covenant economy never received what was promised (Abrahamic promises) is because the Abrahamic promises can only be fulfilled through the new covenant. Without the new covenant in Messiahs blood, those promises cannot be fulfilled.
For as many as are the promises of God, in Him they are yes; therefore also through Him is our Amen to the glory of God through us.
— 2 Corinthians 1:20
Messianic Gentile retweeted
Replying to @Be_Like_JChrist
From the Biblically Consistent View, your claim collapses the moment you acknowledge God's infallible foreknowledge.
Before God created any person, He already knew with absolute certainty who would believe and who would only ever reject Him and perish. God was under no outside power or obligation to create people He knew would be lost. By freely choosing to create them rather than refrain from creating them, God knowingly brought about their certain end.
To say God creates an individual knowing with absolute certainty that they will only ever refuse Him, and also say God is actively seeking to save that person, means God is working at cross-purposes with Himself.
On your view, God would be striving to discredit and falsify His own infallible knowledge...
The Biblically Consistent View avoids this contradiction by recognizing what Scripture plainly declares: God never works in vain, but sovereignly decrees all things... even creating the wicked for the day of judgment... for His own wise and holy purpose (Proverbs 16:4; Romans 9:18–23).
Chris says? Im pretty sure I quoted scripture....
All these died in faith, 👉without receiving the promises,👈 but having seen them and having welcomed them from a distance, and having confessed that they were strangers and exiles on the earth.
— Hebrews 11:13
And all these, having gained approval through their faith, 👉did not receive what was promised👈,
— Hebrews 11:39
Bro walked into a wall when he encountered someone who knows how to refute his Platonism. He then proceeded to move goalpost and make ridiculous claims like, "yall are so obsessed about land." Ironically Hebrews 11 is about the land.
No, I blocked him because he was making stupid claims and began debating like a rookie. I won't tolerate it. If it makes him feel better thinking I cant defend my eschatology, so be it.
I was schooling him and he knew it, which is why he kept moving the goalpost.
"Yeah, well, what about this verse?"
Couldn't stay in context and ran to any and every verse he could to push his paradigm.
Messianic Gentile retweeted
We should be even more honest and stop leaving out the part where God determines what people want to do.
At which point using a label in a way differently than 99.9% of others seems dishonest.












