Aaron Bobeck

Sharing is caring. If you have a @johndeere Gen 4 4600/4640 and get "An Error occurred unexpectedly" on intial startup, you'll get two options — pick STEP 2 (Deselect Data and Reboot), not Step 1. Step 2 fixes it most of the time. If it's stuck after hitting Step 1, it's fine to hit the battery disconnect, then choose Step 2. If you continue to have problems a factory reset under menu, system, file manager, advanced settings (arrow/dot) will usually get rid of the corrupt data. Before factory reset back up run pages/setup data to operations center or a USB in file manager. Incremental 25.4 software 10.35.3817-72 fixes it but at this time only available via USB from your dealer. Reference solution 113561. #harvest26 @ValleyPlains @PVEQUIP @KibbleEquipment

"Anthropic Q3 revenue was a big miss - $16.8bn for the quarter vs $5.4bn implied monthly run-rate for July (which was reported in Aug), implying close to 0 growth in August and September. This has weighed heavily on sentiment, as a key pillar of the AI investment thesis is the ARR growth trajectory of frontier models. The funding stress facing Coreweave and the neocloud ecosystem are further exacerbating concerns." - Goldman Asia S&T

A retired NASA engineer who had worked on the Space Shuttle program for 25 years was hired by SpaceX at age 62. He described the first week as the most disorienting experience of his professional life. At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday." He sat at his desk after the first day and called his wife. He told her he felt like a man who had been swimming with ankle weights for 25 years and someone just cut them off. He could move. He could decide. He could build something in the morning and test it in the afternoon. The constraint that he had accepted as the nature of aerospace engineering turned out to be the nature of bureaucracy. Within 6 months he had contributed to more design iterations than he had completed in his last 5 years at NASA. Not because he was working harder. Because the time between having an idea and testing the idea collapsed from months to hours. The same brain. The same knowledge. A different operating system. He described a specific moment where he proposed a modification to a Raptor engine component. At NASA, the proposal would have entered a queue. At SpaceX, the modification was machined by the end of the day and tested by the following morning. He watched his idea become a physical object in 18 hours. At NASA, 18 hours would not have been enough to schedule the first meeting to discuss whether to schedule a meeting. He told an interviewer: "I didn't get smarter when I went to SpaceX. I got faster. The intelligence was always there. The system was in the way." The difference between SpaceX and NASA is not talent. NASA has extraordinary talent. The difference is the time between a thought and a test. SpaceX compresses it. NASA elongates it. The same engineer produces 10x more at SpaceX than at NASA because the bottleneck was never the engineer. It was the meetings about the meetings about the work.

"My Guy, I Can Code": After Deconstructing Adobe, Dev Uses Claude To Clone Microsoft Office For Free zerohedge.com/ai/my-guy-i-ca…

This is the last critical piece of the spectrum puzzle needed for SpaceX to provide complete phone coverage in America

JUST IN: Apple CEO John Ternus is reportedly considering a major overhaul to “accelerate product development” by cutting management layers and moving toward a more engineering led structure.

*META DEBUTS A DEDICATED, PALM-SIZED DEVICE WITH 5G TO USE MUSE