Akshina (@Akshina4) header
Akshina (@Akshina4) profile picture

Assistant Professor of Marketing @MichiganRoss. A psychology-economics-linguistics enthusiast. She/Her

Ann Arbor, MI
Joined September 2020
Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)Photo by Akshina (@Akshina4)
Articles in Advance 11/24 (4 of 14) "The Language That Drives Engagement: A Systematic Large-scale Analysis of Headline Experiments" by Akshina Banerjee, Oleg Urminsky @Akshina4 @OlegUrminsky pubsonline.informs.org/doi/1…
2
8
841
7/7: Check out the full report for more details and data! Access here: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b8w3…
1
2
237
6/7: Implications? This nuanced view of confidence suggests interventions aimed at reducing general overconfidence might miss the mark. Instead, empowering people to rely on confidence in specific contexts could better combat misinformation.
1
1
129
5/7: Interestingly, this effect held across political lines: both Democrat-leaning and Republican-leaning people were better at distinguishing true from false information when confident in specific judgments, regardless of overall general confidence.
1
1
67
4/7: Check out the figures:
1
1
86
3/7: In this brief report, we find that higher general confidence is indeed correlated with worse performance in spotting false news—consistent with what Lyons et al. 2021 find. But when participants feel confident about the judgment of a specific task , they were more accurate!
1
1
87
2/7: We distinguish between two types of confidence: - General confidence in one's abilities - Specific confidence in a particular judgment While general overconfidence is linked to poorer accuracy, specific confidence in judgment serves as a better predictor of accuracy.
1
2
99
1/7: 📢 New pre-print alert! @mrocklage, Mohsen Mosleh, @DG_Rand and I challenge the common belief that confidence is purely a driver of misinformation susceptibility. Our results show that confidence in specific judgments might actually improve truth discernment. A 🧵👇
1
5
12
1,630
We conducted a global analysis to find out if people have different financial preferences when they are in a different emotional state. Paper out now at Nature Human Behavior, lead by Sam Pertl, with Tara Srirangarajan (both Phd students at Stanford): rdcu.be/dSlqS🧵1/9
2
12
3
64
7,911
We are hiring! Ross School of Business is looking for an Assistant Professor of Marketing. The application link is apply.interfolio.com/148757 Please R/T.
11
29
4,298
Excited to see all the great things Oleg will do for JCR! Congratulations!!
Selfie with the first issue of JCR that I ever read (September 2002):
11
1,143
I wrote a small script for backing up all your Qualtrics surveys (.qsf files + data) locally using their API, and figured it might be helpful for someone else. It could definitely be improved, but it worked for me as a way to have a backup just in case: github.com/whryan/qualtrics_…
2
14
4
58
13,049
Can anyone point me to scholars who work on any two-stage choices, or some kind of nested decisions?
2
361
Excited to read and understand about our spending habits/personas more 😃 Shoutout to my Michigan Ross colleague ⁦@scottianrick⁩ for putting together such an amazing book!
1
9
1,132
Interesting (and fairly depressing) results about how null effects are perceived.
Recently accepted at EJ: ‘The Null Result Penalty’ by Felix Chopra, Ingar Haaland, Christopher Roth, Andreas Stegmann doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead060 @Ingar30 @cp_roth @FelixChopra @RoyalEconSoc #EconTwitter
7
1
21
4,093
Interesting initiative at JCR to help fund data collection for underfunded scholars with promising but incomplete papers. I'm very curious what kind of take-up there will be. In the meantime, spread the word... consumerresearcher.com/jcr-i…
1
18
2
47
9,108
(4/4) So I just hope that along with the person being blamed, these bad incentives can also be blamed.
1
5
354
(3/4) Another incentive is that in a lot of top schools, the expectation of publication is so unrealistic that even machine-like humans won’t be able to achieve it while also being responsibly involved in the works that carries their names.
1
6
390