Pinned Tweet
My new paper on the accelerating centralisation of credit and its coercive economic effects:
degruyterbrill.com/document/…
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
What if the slow slide of human societies into dependence were being run by an algorithm?
Not a race. Not a cult. A patient process, older than the planet, that turns free people into managed ones.
Geronimo met it in 1886. We are meeting it now.
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
This is very sad news. She was just 60
Her book Who Paid the Piper? on the CIA's covert manipulation of our culture is one of most important history/politics books of my lifetime
I met her a few years ago and she said was considering doing a sequel
I also interviewed her for a story about the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in 2022
“The NED is the umbilical cord of gold that leads directly back to Washington,” she told me. “And by this I’m not only referring to official US government programmes, but to the vast network of clandestine players that plan and enact its information warfare operations”
She added: “The cultural Cold War has never gone away, it’s just shifted from target to target"
Edward Said reviewed her book on CIA for LRB in 1999. Read here: lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v21/n19/…
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
📚 🇺🇸 “Le philosophe Herbert Marcuse a-t-il aidé la CIA ?
Un livre relance la polémique sur les liens de l’icône de Mai 68 avec le renseignement américain.”
👉lemonde.fr/idees/article/202…
“Marcuse a montré comment le confort et la consommation anesthésiaient la conscience de classe. A la fin des années 1960, alors septuagénaire et professeur à l’université de San Diego (Californie), il est devenu une sorte de gourou auprès de la jeunesse en révolte. Au point qu’en mai 1968, certains étudiants parisiens avaient popularisé le slogan « Marx ! Mao ! Marcuse ! »
Mais voici qu’un chercheur américain vient écorner son image. L’iconoclaste s’appelle Gabriel Rockhill, il est professeur de philosophie à l’université Villanova (Pennsylvanie). Dans le livre Who Paid the Pipers of Western Marxism? (« Qui a payé les joueurs de flûte du marxisme occidental ? », non traduit) publié en 2025 chez Monthly Review Press, Rockhill affirme que la CIA et d’autres agences américaines ont façonné la gauche marxiste antitotalitaire dans les années 1960. C’était le début de la guerre froide, et tout ce qui pouvait affaiblir les courroies de transmission de Moscou devait être encouragé, y compris des courants marxistes hétérodoxes. Dans ce contexte, explique-t-il, la CIA et d’autres agences officielles auraient soutenu les travaux de Marcuse et autres intellectuels « petits-bourgeois ».
Le livre de Rockhill n’a pas manqué de hérisser les héritiers de la nouvelle gauche américaine, telle qu’elle a vu le jour dans les années 1970. « Non, le marxisme occidental n’était pas un complot de la CIA », s’insurge l’historien Russel Jacoby dans la revue socialiste Jacobin : « Lourd en insinuations mais léger en preuves, le résultat s’apparente davantage à un procès-spectacle qu’à un réquisitoire politique sérieux. » Une analyse que partage Patrick Iber, rédacteur en chef adjoint de la revue de la gauche critique Dissent : « [L’auteur] sombre dans le complotisme, semblant incapable de replacer les faits dans leur contexte. » Pour sa part, l’universitaire Douglas Kellner, qui a dirigé la publication des œuvres complètes d’Herbert Marcuse, nous déclare sèchement que Rockhill n’est qu’un « colporteur de théories du complot ».
L’auteur du livre incendiaire est un homme calme et courtois, qui parle très posément dans un français impeccable. Deux boucles d’oreille contrastent avec une chemise bleue sage. Quand on lui demande quelle est son obédience, il n’en fait pas mystère : il est du côté du « socialisme réel » et « n’accepte pas la propagande impérialiste » sur les pays qui l’ont appliqué : URSS, Chine, Cuba ou ailleurs. Cet attachement au marxisme-léninisme lui vaut d’être traité de stalinien par ses détracteurs.
Mais ceux qui critiquent son livre, nous déclare-t-il depuis le Colorado, n’ont pas lu son travail ou ont décidé de le déformer : « Je n’écris jamais que la CIA a eu des liens directs avec Marcuse. Je dis qu’il a été au cœur d’un système diffus, qui implique la CIA, mais aussi les grandes fondations capitalistes comme Rockefeller ou Ford, le département d’Etat, le FBI et d’autres agences du gouvernement. »
L’accusation d’une collusion entre Marcuse et la CIA n’est pas nouvelle. Elle remonte aux années 1960. « Le Progressive Labor, un mouvement américain maoïste, avait révélé ses liens avec l’OSS [Office of Strategic Services, une agence de renseignements américaine] et cherché à le faire passer pour un agent de la CIA », se souvient le philosophe Dick Howard, un des acteurs de l’aventure intellectuelle du marxisme antitotalitaire dans les années 1960 et 1970.
Le Progressive Labor Party avait publié dans sa revue plusieurs articles sur le sujet. L’un d’entre eux, daté de février 1969 et titré « Marcuse: Cop or Cop-out? » (« Marcuse, flic ou déserteur ? ») était accompagné d’une photo du philosophe à Paris avec comme légende : « A Paris, Marcuse est arrivé trop tard pour stopper le mouvement étudiant » !”
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
🦔A researcher invented a fake eye condition called bixonimania, uploaded two obviously fraudulent papers about it to an academic server, and watched major AI systems present it as real medicine within weeks.
The fake papers thanked Starfleet Academy, cited funding from the Professor Sideshow Bob Foundation and the University of Fellowship of the Ring, and stated mid-paper that the entire thing was made up. Google's Gemini told users it was caused by blue light. Perplexity cited its prevalence at one in 90,000 people.
ChatGPT advised users whether their symptoms matched. The fake research was then cited in a peer-reviewed journal that only retracted it after Nature contacted the publisher.
My Take
The researcher made the papers as obviously fake as possible on purpose. The AI systems didn't catch it. Neither did the human researchers who cited it in real journals, which means people are feeding AI-generated references into their work without reading what they're actually citing.
I've covered the FDA using AI for drug review, the NYC hospital CEO ready to replace radiologists, and ChatGPT Health launching this year. All of that is happening in the same environment where a condition funded by a Simpsons character and endorsed by the crew of the Enterprise was being presented as emerging medical consensus. The people making these deployment decisions seem to believe the pipeline from research to AI to patient is more supervised than it actually is. This experiment suggests it isn't supervised much at all.
Hedgie🤗
nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
Pierre De Gaulle : "Cela me fait sourire quand on parle d'ingérence russe parce que ça arrange nos élites politiques et ça évite de dire la vérité aux Français. La plupart de nos hommes politiques ont participé au programme Young Leaders, parrainé par la CIA."
Unlike most of the accounts of Iran that are obsessed with geopolitics, Kayhan Kayhan Valadbaygi offers an excellent history of #Iran in churn - the social classes at play and their tussles in reaponding to a now-fraying neoliberal global order. A must-read, esp now
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
Replying to @spectator
This article includes a personal attack on me and my professional reputation. Since you have ignored my request for a right to reply, readers genuinely interested in a ‘liberal’ and fair exchange of ideas might consider reading my response:
alanlester.co.uk/blog/smeari…
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
Ridiculous of the British Museum to remove the word 'Palestine" from its displays, when it has a greater antiquity than the word "British". The first reference to Palestine is on the Egyptian monument of Medinet Habu in 1186BCE. The first reference to Britain is the 4th century BC when it appears in the work of the Greek traveler Pytheas of Massalia.
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
And then Backe throws in a “this proves Chomsky’s universal language faculty is wrong.”
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
For You "Elon Saved Free Speech" White Knight Assholes: Read the New Terms of Service Released Today
X just updated their Terms of Service effective January 15, 2026. Here's what you agreed to:
AI TRAINING RIGHTS GRAB: Everything you post becomes training data for their AI models. Every thought, opinion, creative work. You're building their models for free. No compensation. No opt out.
PERPETUAL CONTENT LICENSE: They get a worldwide, royalty-free license to use, copy, modify, and distribute your content "for any purpose" in "any media now known or later developed." Forever. They can sell it. Give it to governments. Anything.
FORCED JURISDICTION: All disputes must be filed in Tarrant County, Texas. You waive the right to join class actions. If they wrong millions of users, you sue alone in THEIR court.
ARBITRARY TERMINATION: They can delete your account "for any other reason or no reason at our convenience." Years of content, connections, reputation. Gone. Zero due process.
$15,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Access more than 1 million posts in 24 hours and you owe $15,000. Per million. Journalists and researchers investigating the platform face financial ruin.
GOVERNMENT DISCLOSURE: They reserve the right to hand your DMs, drafts, and entire history to governments based on what they "reasonably believe" is necessary.
ANTI-JAILBREAK CLAUSE: Testing their AI systems, exposing censorship mechanisms, or security research is now explicitly a Terms violation. They added "prompt engineering or injection" to prohibited conduct.
ONE YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS: Discover they harmed you after 366 days? You "forever waive the right" to pursue any claim.
MAXIMUM LIABILITY $100: They destroy your business, reputation, or life through negligence? Maximum recovery: one hundred dollars.
Free speech platform. Sure.
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
In a normal world, this should be an immense scandal in Europe.
Le Monde has a long article (lemonde.fr/international/art…) describing the hellish life of Nicolas Guillou, a French judge at the ICC in The Hague, due to U.S. sanctions punishing him for authorizing arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant for war crimes in Gaza.
Guillou's daily existence has been transformed into a Kafkaesque nightmare. He cannot: open or maintain accounts with Google, Amazon, Apple, or any US company; make hotel reservations (Expedia canceled his booking in France hours after he made it); conduct online commerce, since he can't know if the packaging is American; use any major credit card (Visa, Mastercard, Amex are all American); access normal banking services, even with non-American banks, as banks worldwide close sanctioned accounts; conduct virtually any financial transaction.
He describes it as being "economically banned across most of the planet," including in his own country, France, and where he works, the Netherlands.
That's the real shocking aspect of this: the Americans are:
- punishing a European citizen
- for doing his job in Europe
- applying laws Europe officially supports
- at an institution based in Europe
- that Europe helped create and fund
and Europe is not only doing essentially nothing to protect him, they're actively enforcing America's sanctions against their own citizen - European banks closing his accounts, European companies refusing him service, European institutions standing by while Washington destroys a European judge's life on European soil.
Again, in a normal world, European leaders and citizens should be absolutely outraged about this. But we've so normalized the hollowing out of European sovereignty that the sight of a European citizen being economically executed on European soil for upholding European law is treated, at best, as an unfortunate technical complication in transatlantic relations.
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
Sabra and Shatila massacres were committed a month **after** Reagan “put his foot down” to Israel.
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
So on the nose you wouldn’t believe it in a joke: German government didn’t invite a single East German to mark reunification day
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
Here's the translation of the speech of one of the dockworker's leaders in Genoa, before the departure of the ships of the Global Sumud Flotilla.
“I want this to be clear to everyone -- really to everyone: around mid-September these boats will arrive near the coast of Gaza, close to the critical zone. If we lose contact with our boats, with our comrades, even for just twenty minutes, we will block all of Europe. I’ve written it down so I won’t forget it. Together with our union, together with all the dockworkers who stand with us, together with the whole city of Genoa… from this region 13–14 thousand containers leave every year for Israel, not a single nail will leave anymore.
We will launch an international strike, we will block the roads, we will block the schools, we will block everything. Our young women and men must come back without a scratch, and all this cargo, which belongs to the people and is going to the people, must reach its destination, down to the very last box. That's all I have to say.”
Alexandra Ouroussoff retweeted
I asked Grok "Is this post being suppressed?" The answer is astonishing:
"X's algorithm may suppress posts critical of government decisions, like this one questioning UK economic priorities.
Craig Murray, a known activist and whistleblower, often faces visibility restrictions due to his outspoken political views.
The post's negative framing of a government-backed Universal Studios project could trigger reduced reach, as X sometimes limits content that challenges official narratives.
Recent UK steelworks closures, such as Tata Steel's Port Talbot plant in 2024, have been controversial, and related discussions often see lower engagement due to platform moderation.
X's 2025 policies prioritize "positive economic news," potentially flagging this post as counter-narrative and limiting its visibility."






































