Massachusetts, USA
Joined December 2020
- Tweets36.3K
- Following1K
- Followers2.1K
- Likes46.2K
Pinned Tweet
You don’t have to like Aidan Kearney @DoctorTurtleboy . You can find his style obnoxious, offensive or completely over the top. None of that makes his constitutional rights less important. Free speech is pretty meaningless if we only defend it for people who say things we like and say them nicely.
And if you live in Massachusetts, you should care where the line between witness intimidation and protected speech/petitioning is drawn. A verdict isn’t binding precedent, but an appellate decision affirming a conviction on that theory can become caselaw that applies to the next person. This is bigger than Turtleboy.
FTB
By “change her testimony,” you mean “tell the truth”?
And sure, Jen McCabe was sooooo terrified of @DoctorTurtleboy that she conducted her own Turtleboy stakeouts. This is getting so old and tedious.
Alexis K retweeted
CW v Aidan Kearney
Motion in Limine
Preclude Chris Albert from mentioning “Economical Harm”… if said motion is Denied we require Chris to turn over the following as this would be exculpatory and possible impeachment material..⬇️⬇️
(Not real motion but would be interesting)🐐
And this is exactly the problem. They keep relying on forensic artifacts to support their conclusions without establishing what those artifacts actually prove.
To be clear, nobody is disputing that mobilesafari.plist contains a record of the 6:24 search. Yet they spend all this time insisting that timestamp proves the search only occurred at 6:24. Then they admit they haven’t seen any testing establishing how iOS 15.2.1 handles repeated identical searches. So how exactly can they rule out an earlier search? Seems like a pretty important detail to establish before treating that timestamp as definitive proof that an earlier identical search didn’t occur, doesn’t it?
Then there’s the discrepancy between Whiffin’s and Hyde’s KnowledgeC exhibits, which they acknowledge but can’t explain.
Perhaps instead of pumping out AI-generated graphics and lecturing everyone else about how to interpret evidence, they should spend some time understanding the evidence themselves. Because the issue isn’t whether those timestamps exist. It’s whether they actually establish the conclusions they keep drawing from them.
Alexis K retweeted
𝟐𝟓 𝐈𝐍𝐕𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐒: 𝐃𝐀𝐘𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐒
Massachusetts pumps $475 million a year directly into the daycare industry through noncompetitive grants.
Since the state began picking up the tab, those grants have cost taxpayers roughly $1.7 billion.
I spent months tracking where the biggest checks are going — while frontline educators and families continue to struggle to make ends meet.
With that much taxpayer money at stake, it’s a story worth following.
Alexis K retweeted
Beacon Hill refused to show me the receipts. So I worked to give them a little gift: the chance to show those receipts directly to you, the taxpayers who paid for them. 🧾
You’re welcome, Mr. Speaker and Madam President 😊✅
You can find the full clip in @TheEmilySee ‘s Google docs under CF McCarthy’s sites.google.com/view/foia-a…
1
54
I’ve always wondered how Kerry “I lied to the grand jury” Roberts heard this conversation between Jennifer McCabe and Karen Read when it occurred before Kerry arrived and didn’t occur over Bluetooth.
I always thought this was something overlooked. Kerry overheard Karen saying she left John at Waterfall and Jen had to remind Karen she saw her at 34 Fairview. Odd seeing as Jen was insistent that Karen wanted to go to 34F “because she knew what she did”. 🤥
11
293
What an absolutely disgraceful attempt by Morrissey to deflect responsibility.
Blaming the medical examiner’s suicide ruling is particularly absurd considering the medical examiner testified that her determination depended on information provided by MSP investigators. So the investigation Morrissey is defending here is the very investigation that led to the medical examiner’s ruling that he’s using as an excuse for his office’s failures. You can’t make this shit up.
The Norfolk District Attorney’s Office just released a statement following Matthew Farwell’s conviction for killing Sandra Birchmore and her unborn child.
Part of the statement reads: “Its ability to prosecute was constrained by the finding of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner that the manner of death was suicide.”
It is important to add context. During opening statements in Farwell’s trial, Assistant U.S. Attorney Torey Cummings told the jury that Massachusetts State Police troopers assigned to the Norfolk DA’s Office:
“very quickly told others, including the medical examiner, that this was definitively a suicide and there was no foul play. They told the medical examiner, no need to treat this death as suspicious.”
1
19
468
Alexis K retweeted
The Norfolk District Attorney’s Office just released a statement following Matthew Farwell’s conviction for killing Sandra Birchmore and her unborn child.
Part of the statement reads: “Its ability to prosecute was constrained by the finding of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner that the manner of death was suicide.”
It is important to add context. During opening statements in Farwell’s trial, Assistant U.S. Attorney Torey Cummings told the jury that Massachusetts State Police troopers assigned to the Norfolk DA’s Office:
“very quickly told others, including the medical examiner, that this was definitively a suicide and there was no foul play. They told the medical examiner, no need to treat this death as suspicious.”
Today, the federal jury delivered justice for Sandra Birchmore and her baby.
It took the FBI and the MA USAO to do what the NCDAO and MSP failed to do.
🚨 BREAKING 🚨 The jury has reached a verdict in federal trial of former Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell, charged in connection w/ the murder of Sandra Birchmore and the death of her unborn child.
We will provide an update as soon as the verdict is announced in open court.
ALT Breaking. Verdict Reached. United States v. Matthew Farwell. Verdict to be announced in open court. U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Massachusetts.
8
314
Alexis K retweeted
Richard! Now I understand where you came from and why you’re acting like this! BerlinRosen is now hiring unfunny, dull-witted people with 731 followers to post and repost the same tedious and lame memes? Good to know. How much did you bill your clients for this mundane AI creation?
If the stored url can change as the user navigates without updating the original timestamp, can someone explain why Record 4028’s tab-order index changes from 10 to 6 to 0 while the url and last_viewed_time remain unchanged? How are those changes explained by the underlying data?
1
3
214
No one has been able to answer this question.
@Cellebrite @BlakDouble can you please clarify. During the second trial you testified that the sequence of events was:
1. 2:27:42: Hockomock sports search conducted and logged in BrowserState record 4028.
2. The tab used for this search remained foregrounded (top tab in the tab stack).
3. 6:24:18 - The “hos long” search was entered and logged in BrowserState record 4028.
4. 6:24:24 - Safari was backgrounded while record 4028 was allegedly the foregrounded tab and contained the “hos long” Google search URL.
5. 6:24:24 to 10:33:34 - There’s roughly a four-hour period with no Safari activity.
6. 10:33:34 - Safari was brought back to the foreground, record 4028 returned to focus, and Safari began loading the 6:24 “hos long” search results.
7. 10:33:35 - Record 4028 was closed and was never accessed or brought to the foreground again.
If this is true, how do you reconcile the tab-order of record 4028?
If record 4028 was truly the foregrounded tab from 2:27:40 until it was allegedly closed at 10:33, then the BrowserState/WAL data should behave like that.
It doesn’t.
While 4028 still contains the same “hos long” URL and the same 2:27:40 last_viewed_time, its order_index shifts: 10 - 6 - 0
The shift from 10 to 6 suggests the tab stack was being recalculated around 4028, likely because other tabs - PayPal, Eastern Bank, Gallery Shoots, Raining Men, etc. - were being closed. If other tabs were being viewed and closed, 4028 was not continuously foregrounded.
So your theory contradicts itself: 4028 cannot be both the continuously foregrounded tab and a tab whose stored order changes because other tabs are being accessed and closed around it.
72
