Faisal Chiroma

I think they just recruited you because this is the first time I am seeing your account. As usual, you already exposed yourself in two seconds. Just take a look at your copy-and-paste job: you typed "(Quran 14}" with a broken bracket when the inheritance verses are in Surah An-Nisa (Chapter 4:11 to 12 and 4:176), not Chapter 14. It shows you don’t know what you are doing. But for the sake of Muslims and bystanders, let me enlighten you. The bone of contention is: A woman dies leaving a husband (1/2, which is 3/6), a mother (1/6), and two sisters (2/3, which is 4/6). When you add, those numerators (3 + 1 + 4) add up to 8 parts over a base of 6, which is 4/3.  Why does a conditional legal code assign fixed fractional weights that sometimes add up above 1 (Awl) and sometimes add up below 1 (Radd)? Because the Quran is laying out general statutory claim weights across infinite family combinations. The Quran is not writing a single static receipt for one family. The Quran is making a universal legal rule where every single heir's share depends on who else is alive in the room. This means those fractions operate as relative weights rather than isolated slices of one fixed pie. This right here is the basic part you people never understand. And I do not even blame you, because when your whole mission is hunting for faults in the Quran, your brain shuts off and you stop thinking critically.  Every legal and financial system on earth works this way. In estate law and bankruptcy liquidation, if someone dies leaving $60,000 and three statutory claimants hold valid claims of $30,000 (1/2), $10,000 (1/6), and $40,000 (2/3) which totals $80,000, nobody on the surface of the earth will scream that the law forgot how to count. Every court applies pro-rata abatement: you keep the statutory ratio between the heirs intact (3 : 1 : 4) and divide the estate into 8 equal shares instead of 6, giving them 3/8, 1/8, and 4/8 (1/2).  This is the basic thing you and your ilk have failed to understand all this while. Or do you think if there was a genuine mistake in this verse, it is you in 2026 with a copy-pasted tweet that would discover it? For over 1,400 years, sworn enemies of Islam who mastered classical Arabic, Jewish and Christian scholars living right beside the Muslims, and brilliant mathematicians combed through every single letter of the Quran looking for a crack to bring it down, and none of them could fault this system. It’s better you know your limit. There is a limit to propaganda. Again, just like Ashkan on Saturday, calling Awl an "outside correction" invented because Allah missed the math is historically and mathematically ignorant. Funny enough, that second column on your own table labeled "The Accurate Share" (3/8, 1/8, 1/2) IS OUR ISLAMIC AWL calculation that you copied and tried to weaponize against us without knowing how ratios work! Cutting only the sisters' share or only the husband's share randomly, the way ignorant critics expect a static list to work, is what would violate Allah's word. When Umar ibn al-Khattabconsulted the Companions, including Al-Abbas and Zayd ibn Thabit, they applied the same Quranic principle already used when unpaid debts exceed a dead person's estate. Scaling the denominator from 6 to 8 preserves every heir's Quranic weight relative to one another without cheating anyone. Did you also know that solving Islamic inheritance fractions (Ilm al-Fara'id) is what pushed Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi to write the foundational book of Algebra, dedicating half the book to inheritance math? Wait: Do you even have a fraction of this legal precision anywhere in your own book? People whose scripture gave women zero guaranteed inheritance alongside brothers, and who threw their own religious laws in the dustbin centuries ago to subject their families and estates to the whims of secular British law, now want to lecture Muslims on divine jurisprudence. lol 😂 Allah knows best.