Pinned Tweet
Twitter builds a database on what they think you are, and Allows / Disallows your comments to be seen. Allows / Disallows what content you can click through. They're ghosting posts and limiting view counts. Some can be seen, others cannot.
This is CRAZY. Worthwhile read.
To co oglądacie to ilustracja jak wygląda ostateczny koniec zaufania do państwa i systemu bankowego.
Paragwaj płonie.
Jeszcze w poniedziałek ueno bank był dumą paragwajskiej bankowości. Pierwszy cyfrowy bank w kraju, jeden z pięciu największych banków komercyjnych i oficjalny sponsor narodowego sportu. Przez jego konta przechodziły dwie na trzy płatności elektroniczne w kraju. Blisko 3 miliony klientów w państiwe które ma 7 mln obywateli.
We wtorek rano do ueno bank wkroczyli przedstawiciele banku centralnego. Powód: współczynnik wypłacalności spadł poniżej połowy wymaganego minimum. Konta zamrożono, usługi stanęły, przed oddziałami ustawiły się kolejki.
Typowy run na bank.
Wieczorem prezydent Santiago Peña skwitował sytuację jednym zdaniem: Ueno „już nie istnieje”.
Tak po prostu.
Ludzie nie mogą wypłacić pensji, emeryci nie mają dostępu do swoich świadczeń. Zamrożone są nawet składki IPS, czyli paragwajskiego ZUS-u. Handlowcy ostrzegają przed paraliżem rynku- sklepy nie mają jak przyjmować płatności. Swoje oszczędności w Ueno trzymała też duża część piłkarzy krajowej ligi.
Prezes banku centralnego podał się do dymisji, a prokuratura nakazała zatrzymanie zarządu banku. W Asunción doszło do starć z policją. Tłum żąda teraz impeachmentu samego prezydenta.
Dlaczego prezydenta, skoro upadł prywatny bank?
Bo to nie był zwykły prywatny bank.
Peña był udziałowcem holdingu Ueno jeszcze w 2025 roku. Odkąd objął urząd, do Ueno płynęła rzeka publicznych pieniędzy. Według Bloomberga było to ok. 870 mln dolarów, blisko 30% wszystkich depozytów banku. Do tego trzeba doliczyć jeszcze fundusze emerytalne IPS, ulokowane na lata.
A kto miał tym wszystkim nadzorować? Carlos Carvallo, prezes banku centralnego. Wcześniej… szef Ueno.
Lis pilnował kurnika. Dosłownie.
Sygnały ostrzegawcze słychać było od lat:
– w 2024 r. bank centralny Carvallo pozwolił Ueno rozłożyć na 20 lat ok. 300 milionów dolarów złych kredytów po przejętym Visión Banco, lokalna prasa pisała, że to "bez precedensu",
– szefowie IPS przyznawali publicznie, że nie mogą dać 100% gwarancji na pieniądze ulokowane przez emerytów w Ueno,
– Agencja Fitch ostrzegała że mają miejsce dziwne transakcje z podmiotami powiązanymi i wątpliwe praktyki księgowe.
Mimo to jeszcze w marcu lokalna agencja ratingowa powiązana z Fitchem trzymała Ueno na poziomie AA z adnotacją o „silnym trendzie”. Bank chwalił się też certyfikatem uczciwości otrzymanym od państwowego sekretariatu antykorupcyjnego.
Siedem miesięcy później banku nie ma.
Jak na ironię, ten sam bank centralny od lat ostrzegał obywateli przed bitcoinem. Jego koronny argument brzmiał następująco: kryptowaluty nie mają gwarancji ze strony państwa (Paragwaj to jedno z największych zagłębi wydobywania bitcoina na świecie)
No więc sprawdzamy ile te gwarancje były warte.
Fundusz gwarancyjny pokrywa ok. 228 mln guarani na osobę, czyli mniej więcej 40 tys. dolarów (w Polsce BFG gwarantuje depozyty do sumy 100 tys. euro). Ludzie stoją teraz pod bankiem z transparentami „Państwo musi zagwarantować 100% środków”. Los całej reszty oszczędności jest uzależniony od tego ile syndycy ocalą z masy upadłościowej.
Wniosek nasuwa się sam: pieniądze w banku nie są do końca Twoje. To obietnica, że ktoś Ci je odda, i działa to świetnie dopóki wszyscy w nią wierzą.
Atom Jones 💛🌕🌗🌑🖤 retweeted
🚨WHAT?! A study discovered fluorescent CARBON NANODOTS inside Coca-Cola and Pepsi that cross the BLOOD–BRAIN BARRIER.
The findings emerged after the Gates Foundation began investing in both PepsiCo and the world's LARGEST Coca-Cola bottler — a stake now valued at $660 MILLION
The nanoparticles are about 5 nanometers wide, composed of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, with GRAPHITIC structural features.
When administered to mice, the carbon nanodots invaded multiple organs, including the brain, heart, liver, kidneys, and lungs.
Similar carbon nanodots are being engineered for medical imaging, drug delivery, and cancer therapy.
One possible explanation is that they formed during high-temperature processing of sugars and caramel coloring.
Alternatively, carbon dots can be deliberately manufactured through chemical synthesis, using controlled heating, carbon precursors, and surface modifications to produce nanoparticles with specific properties.
The researchers could NOT establish the particles' exact origin.
I'd love this.
Imagine you’re on a fancy dinner cruise in Thailand, and suddenly the crew tells everyone to drop to the floor because the boat is about to squeeze under a bridge.
That’s what happened to one tourist on day 11 of her trip. With the water running high, the bridges along the route were sitting so low that there was barely any room between the roof of the boat and the concrete above. Passengers had to get down on the floor and keep their eyes straight ahead as the boat slid underneath, close enough that standing up could have been deadly. Dinner, drinks, and a near brush with a bridge, all in one night.
Would you have stayed on that boat, or asked to get off at the next stop?
Bankers stealing money? Psshhh you don't say!
🚨🇵🇾 CHAOS in Paraguay as largest digital bank Ueno COLLAPSES
Central Bank seizes it after solvency ratio crashes and around 3 million customers are LOCKED OUT of app, cards & transfers.
Central Bank President Carlos Carvallo resigned right after pulling the plug. He previously ran the firm that birthed Ueno.
Anti-Corruption forces have ordered the detention of 8 top execs including the founder.
Writer: Bri
How obedient are you?
WEF Admits COVID Was a ‘Test’ of Public’s Obedience to New World Order
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has admitted that the COVID-19 pandemic was a test of the public’s obedience in accepting their ‘New World Order’.
The WEF posted the following admission to the “My Carbon” page of its website where they make a pitch for 15-minute smart cities.
Thegatewaypundit.com reports: The first of three “developments” that the WEF says must be in place before the world can evolve into its utopian vision of “smart and sustainable cities,” is compliance with restrictions on our freedom. It writes:
1. COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.
They were testing us. That’s what Covid was all about. They wanted to see how many of us would give up our individual freedom and individual sovereignty by complying with a “new normal” that consisted of restrictions bordering on the absurd.
Why, for instance was it “safe” to shop at Lowe’s or Home Depot but unsafe to shop at a small business or attend church? Why was it OK to go to strip clubs in Michigan but you couldn’t buy seeds for a garden?
What the WEF is implying with its above statement is that in order to be “sustainable,” people and societies will need to be compliant with a new more authoritarian global order. Don’t ask questions. Don’t resort to logic. Just obey.
Would we be obedient in the face of idiotic new laws and regulations, like wearing face diapers to stop what was said to be an aerosolized virus, and standing six feet apart in public, and submitting to a never-before-used, unlicensed mRNA gene-based injection?
They said it was good for you, so roll up your sleeve. Don’t ask questions. If you did, you could lose your job and be treated as a societal outcast. Many people lost friends or even close family members to this monstrous “test” of our willingness to unquestioningly do what we’re told.
Nearly five years later, arguably the most powerful nonprofit public-private partnership in the world, the WEF, admits it was all a test of our wills and celebrates the fact that most of us failed the test (or passed with flying colors depending how you look at it).
They wanted to find out how many of us would prove our servitude to the lawless, fascistic beast system by complying with “unimaginable restrictions,” many of which were created out of thin air with absolutely no scientific evidence to back them up as contributing anything to public health.
The U.S. government’s top health bureaucrat, Dr. Anthony Fauci, admitted recently that there was no science behind his decision to require Americans to socially distance six feet apart.
#KlausSchwab #WEF2030Agenda
thepeoplesvoice.tv/wef-admit…
Atom Jones 💛🌕🌗🌑🖤 retweeted
Hey @grok, concise no spin.
Right after Diana’s 1997 death, former MI5 officer Annie Machon reported that Diana planned a global humanitarian campaign supporting a specific country and feared a plot against her life because of it.
@grok: 1 Which country?
2 What exact method did she fear would be used against her?
Country and method only.
Every which way you look. Incredible.
Hey @grok, concise no spin.
Right after Diana’s 1997 death, former MI5 officer Annie Machon reported that Diana planned a global humanitarian campaign supporting a specific country and feared a plot against her life because of it.
@grok: 1 Which country?
2 What exact method did she fear would be used against her?
Country and method only.
How are they gonna prove it's "reckless endangerment of public health?"
Atom Jones 💛🌕🌗🌑🖤 retweeted
🚨German Chancellor Olaf Scholz apparently suffered an accident that injured his eye.
This occurred shortly before he was due to be interviewed by a financial and insider-trading monitoring committee, where he was expected to disclose valuable information about bankers.
He was injured instead.
Later, he claimed he could not remember anything about any meetings with the bankers.
Things are getting really weird...
How many smoking guns are there in this case? How many do we need?
June 2024 a "Confidential Informant" made a drug buy from a guy sharing an address with Lance Twiggs & Tyler Robinson
He was not charged with Distribution of Narcotics until JULY 2025. 👀
August '25 he cut a "deal" & got only 6 months house arrest and his prison sentence suspended.
What do you think he did to get such a good deal? 🤔
THIS is how the government creates PATSIES.
Hat tip to @thisauthentic for helping me uncover this.
More will be coming soon. 🫡
Over the counter FTW!
🚨BREAKING: We did it!
We have formally filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA, demanding that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin be made available over the counter.
This isn’t just about medication—it’s about your fundamental right to medical freedom.
We will not let the medical-industrial complex dictate what you can and cannot access.
Please share and repost this message to help raise awareness. It is essential that the public be informed.
Follow my page for more motivational and educational content.
Given the election results is Nuclear War more or less likely?
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.




























