YouTube just blatantly lied straight to my face 😭😭🥀
They supposedly “re-reviewed my channel,” and upheld my termination, ALL IN UNDER 1 MINUTE. ONE. MINUTE. Are we fr 💀
Here’s the timeline:
- I tweeted @TeamYouTube at 4:43 PM, asking for a proper re-review of my falsely terminated channel (nitter.gq/BADFLAREE/status/20057…)
- YouTube replied to my tweet at 5:01 PM, saying they’ll check on my situation
- They IMMEDIATELY sent me a DM at 5:01 PM, saying they re-reviewed my channel, and confirmed the termination stands
How is that even possible????? Trick question, it’s not.
I simply asked for a re-review of my channel, accounting for proper context of my content, so they can see I haven’t broken their policies. They can’t even bother to pretend like they took a proper look. It’s a sick joke.
I’m tired man
#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators
Hello @TeamYouTube
I am appealing the recent termination of my channel for alleged “Harassment or Cyberbullying.” My content does not contain harassment, threats, targeted insults, stalking, doxxing, mocking or any behavior that violates YouTube’s harassment guidelines.
I assume the specific video that flagged my channel was "DANK CHARLIE KIRK MEMES". This video was a commentary on the internet's reaction of Charlie Kirk's death, and I believe it was flagged and terminated my channel without proper context.
My video:
✅ Starts with the first 20s with an EDSA disclaimer
✅ Explicitly states I DO NOT support or celebrate political violence
✅ Was a commentary analysis on HOW the internet reacted to the event with memes.
Analyzing "meme culture" is standard commentary and falls under your own Public Interest exceptions updated in June 2025. Countless other creators have covered these exact memes/reactions without being banned (examples attached).
An instant permanent ban for content that follows all EDSA guidelines is a massive AI overreach. Please get a human specialist to look at this with full, proper context. This channel is my livelihood.
Channel URL: (youtube.com/channel/UCpUyrRZ…)
Hello @TeamYouTube
I am appealing the recent termination of my channel for alleged “Harassment or Cyberbullying.” My content does not contain harassment, threats, targeted insults, stalking, doxxing, mocking or any behavior that violates YouTube’s harassment guidelines.
I assume the specific video that flagged my channel was "DANK CHARLIE KIRK MEMES". This video was a commentary on the internet's reaction of Charlie Kirk's death, and I believe it was flagged and terminated my channel without proper context.
My video:
✅ Starts with the first 20s with an EDSA disclaimer
✅ Explicitly states I DO NOT support or celebrate political violence
✅ Was a commentary analysis on HOW the internet reacted to the event with memes.
Analyzing "meme culture" is standard commentary and falls under your own Public Interest exceptions updated in June 2025. Countless other creators have covered these exact memes/reactions without being banned (examples attached).
An instant permanent ban for content that follows all EDSA guidelines is a massive AI overreach. Please get a human specialist to look at this with full, proper context. This channel is my livelihood.
Channel URL: (youtube.com/channel/UCpUyrRZ…)
YouTube after terminating a harmless special-needs channel:
🚨YouTube Deleted our Special-Needs Parents Channel with ZERO strikes or warnings. AI denied appeal. Videos/followers gone 🥺 No Channel is Safe anymore - LIKE/REPOST to help 🚩a human & explain we broke no rules #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators
@YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators
Ok never mind yes it can nitter.gq/splashplatevgc/status/…
Not even a MoistCr1TiKaL co-sign can get you unbanned on YouTube
Jesus christ we’re all so fucked
