Former Gator PK/Captain ('79-'81) UF-Journalism Degree Florida Blue Key From Sarasota, FL, now Birmingham, AL Retired 2024 Steelcase 36 yrs
Birmingham, AL
Joined January 2011
- Tweets9.9K
- Following3.2K
- Followers472
- Likes10.6K
Brian Clark retweeted
They called it a wave. Waves have a shape. This has a signature.
25 points in Texas. 24 in Iowa. 22 in South Carolina. 21 in Kansas. The redder the state, the deeper the swing — while actual swing states barely moved.
That’s not how voters work. That’s the tell.
Buckle up. This is just getting started. 🔥 🇺🇸 🫡 #TRUMP2028
Brian Clark retweeted
And there you have it. This isn’t just a political bloodbath. This is the continuation of the systematic takedown of our civilization.
Some of us tried to warn you.
When a Muslim Brotherhood member wins a Senate race, that’s NOT DEMOCRACY; that’s USEFUL IDIOTS hating their own country. When the mullahs in Iran took over, socialists helped them, and later, the Islamists killed them all. This is the most dangerous moment for Western civilization. GOD BLESS AMERICA.
U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is a dark chapter in this great nation’s history.
And as the Bible warns:
“For whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” — Galatians 6:7 (KJV)
Be careful what you plant in the name of democracy. You may not enjoy the harvest.
Brian Clark retweeted
🚨 THE AUTOPSY SHOULD START IN THE SENATE: Democrats took 54 seats and at least 228 in the House.
Trump was not on the ballot. John Thune was the Majority Leader.
Congress never codified DOGE. Congress never passed the SAVE America Act. Congress never lifted a finger about rogue judges.
They had two years and a mandate and they sat on it.
The base did not stay home because Trump failed. They stayed home because Congress never fought.
Blame the men who held the gavel and never used it.
Brian Clark retweeted
We're in a new era of communication, and only one side seems to be living in it. The old guard consultant class is about to be relegated to the dustbin of history.
If you think that high prices lost the election for the right, you don't understand marketing. Humans have no problem paying a premium for a good quality brand. Notice the word "brand", not "product". Are Nikes better than New Balance? Nope. But the brand is better. And notice what happened when they tinkered with the brand and screwed their core narrative? Nike stock fell through the basement. Did the product change? Nope. The brand did.
It's not the product, it's the brand. Results don't sell the product, the storytelling does. Will these newly-elected commies lower prices? Of course not. Are they gonna get you free healthcare? No, your insurance is gonna get even worse, just like it did the last time they tried socialized medicine. They're not going to do anything they've sold you, but...like Saul Goodman said: if you're committed enough, you can make any story work.
The committed storytelling of a couple insane podcasters was enough to fracture an entire political coalition from their own side in less than 2 years...they have zero power, zero credibility, they've never actually governed anything nor produced any results, but...they're good storytellers, and that's all that matters. Are they telling a good story? No, it's atrocious, but they're telling their atrocious story effectively and compellingly.
It is 100% true that everything's too damn expensive, and we all know that inflated prices are always sticky. Does anyone know that it's entirely the result of shutting down the global economy over the flu and (both naive republicans and democrats) printing infinity dollars for several years? Nope...because nobody has effectively told that story, and it's an unsexy story to tell. "Free stuff!" is a VERY easy story to tell, and when everyone's gotta take out a second mortgage just to pay their insurance premiums, "free healthcare" is an unbeatable story. It doesn't matter that "free healthcare" doesn't exist and socialized medicine is a terrible product...it's not the product, it's the brand. And "FREE!" is a great brand.
You can't get mad at people for having the financial literacy of a 9 year old. I mean, you can, but they outnumber you a million to one, so it's not going to be productive. You need to figure out how to make an unsexy story sexy, or else the "free stuff!" crowd is going to eat your lunch every time. If you give people a choice between earning a six pack on a treadmill or taking Ozempic, they're gonna choose Ozempic...they don't care about the side effects. If you give people a choice between fiscal discipline or free stuff...guess what they'll pick? They don't care about the side effects.
With projected growth of 5%, the economy right now is stronger than it's been in generations. Is that the story you hear? Nope. Is that the vibe you feel? Absolutely not, especially when every time you fill up your gas tank, it feels like a diesel enema.
It's not the product, it's the brand. A great product can fall into oblivion with bad messaging...a single bad review from one effective storyteller can tank a restaurant. The "influencer economy" is lucrative for a reason; everybody inherently understands the importance of effective storytelling...except the right. Zohran Mamdani gets it...he has an army of influencers on staff. In a perfect metaphor of this transitional phase of old guard vs new wave political messaging, Zohran nuked the Vice President into oblivion with maybe the biggest ratio in the history of the internet. By simply posting the subway assistant meme, Mamdani got 2 MILLION likes, quoting a post from the VP that had only 10K likes. If you're reading that sentence thinking "this is fucking ridiculous, you're talking about social media likes as political analysis now?"...you are the problem.
Yes, this stuff matters. Rizz matters. The President did a masterful job of this kind of retail politics in his historic 2024 campaign...you can be angry that this is what politics has been reduced to, but you can either adapt or die.
"No the problem is, you didn't deliver enough for the American people!" Are you a moron? Since when does anybody care about that? What have democrats delivered for Californians in the last 20 years? Unmitigated wildfires, homeless drug zombies everywhere, roads that look like Fallujah in 2004...people don't care about results. They think they care about results. That want you to believe they care about results, just as Nike wants you to believe their shoes are better than New Balance...but at the end of the day, all people really care about is the swoosh.
Adapt or die.
Guys, I hate to break it to you, but most political advisors are so bafflingly incompetent, it would make your head spin. All the talented communicators go work in Hollywood or at Saatchi and Saatchi, and these political bros never tap these agencies for help...I've connected several campaigns with literally the best marketing geniuses in the game, got them discounted rates, even...and they just never even bothered calling. It truly feels like a lot of consultants and candidates just want to lose.
You ever wonder how my ads went so massively viral, but there's not been a single candidate who's come close to it? It's their dumbass advisors. I didn't go with any political advisors, and they were SO mad about it. I partnered with a filmmaker and marketing wizard, instead of political grifters. Why? Because I wanted our messaging to be effective. Political ads suck. Nobody watches them. I wanted people to want to watch my ads. The fact that nobody else understands this is...I honestly don't know how to explain it, other than they want to lose.
There are a bunch of candidates who love it when their party loses power. It takes all the heat off them, because then they can't be expected to pass legislation when they're in the minority, plus they can fundraise way better off of the rage when the opposition is running roughshod over the country. Baffling to watch.
Brian Clark retweeted
Say Republicans lose the House and the Senate. Then what?
Start with the Senate. It's been a graveyard under Thune. John Thune is a Bush Republican — RINO, Republican In Name Only — to his bones. As Majority Leader, he has spent two years managing Democrats instead of defeating them. When your own leader already treats the minority like a partner, handing it the gavel is a change of nameplate, not of direction.
Now the House. A Democratic House has one real move: investigate. Hearings. Document demands. Another round of hearings. That is the entire playbook. But a congressional subpoena is only paper until somebody enforces it. A contempt referral goes to the Justice Department. If the demand is a partisan fishing trip, DOJ has no duty to chase it. Without DOJ, nobody is forced to comply and nobody pays a price. It's cameras, not consequences. One caveat — they control the purse strings. Investigations may go nowhere, but a Democratic House can still choke funding for anything the administration wants. What they can't do is defund DOJ. The one lever that makes the rest of their playbook work is the one lever they don't hold. Even if Republicans lose the House, the administration doesn't lose its investigative arm. Trump's Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program does the same work the House would — gathering tips, routing them to inspectors general, surfacing fraud in programs like SNAP, healthcare, and unemployment — except it sits inside DOJ, which controls intake, routing, and charging. A Democratic House can subpoena all it wants. This mechanism doesn't need their permission to move. That's the difference between a stage and a courtroom. And the tips aren't coming only from Republicans. The Somali fraud network in Minnesota has already pulled in Democratic officials and donors — and the same program isn't limited to one state. If the dime drops in California or Michigan or anywhere else, DOJ follows it. Unlike a congressional witch hunt, which dies the moment DOJ shrugs, these investigations end in charges. That's not a witch hunt when the evidence walks in the door on its own.
A double loss would also rattle Iran. With Washington gridlocked after January, Trump would have every incentive to settle accounts with Tehran before the new Congress can tie his hands. Distraction at home is the one thing that historically slows him down abroad — remove it, and the clock on Tehran speeds up.
Then there is the pardon power. Article II, plain as day. And Democrats wrote the newest rules for it themselves. Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter for anything going back to 2014. On his way out the door, he pardoned Anthony Fauci, Gen. Mark Milley, the entire January 6 committee and its staff, and five members of his own family. Most of them were never charged with anything. They were pardoned in advance. So if Democrats take the House tonight and aim witch hunts at Trump or his allies, that same precedent means a lot of people could be shielded for the last ten years before any charge ever lands. When the same party that cheered all of that cries abuse over a pardon, ask them a simple question: where was your conscience in January 2025? That standard cuts both ways, starting at the ballot box.
If the night ends badly, don't despair. Two years of Democrat subpoenas aren't a government. They're a stage.
-- Joseph Fosco
November 3, 2026
Brian Clark retweeted
La publicación del dueño empezó a compartirse por todas partes.
La influencer terminó borrando el vídeo.
Varios clientes que habían cancelado sus reservas llamaron para volver a reservar.
Pero lo mejor llegó una semana después.
Una chica con apenas 2.000 seguidores fue a cenar al restaurante con su pareja.
Pagaron su cuenta de 68€ y, antes de marcharse, pidió permiso para grabar un vídeo.
El dueño le preguntó si quería algún descuento.
Ella respondió:
«No. La comida me ha gustado y quiero recomendarla. Eso no significa que tengáis que invitarme».
El vídeo tuvo miles de visualizaciones y atrajo nuevos clientes.
Cuando el dueño le dio las gracias, ella le dijo:
«Tener seguidores no te da derecho a exigir que los demás trabajen gratis».
En esta vida, hay dos tipos de personas: Las que huyen y las que toman decisiones.
Si eres del segundo grupo y tienes poco tiempo para aprender a gestionar tu dinero y entender como funciona, todos los días mando un mail que te ayudará a entender porque tu patrimonio no crece.
lasreglasdeldin.substack.com…
Día que no estás, consejo que te pierdes.
Brian Clark retweeted
Confirmed cases of voluntary departure have soared to the highest levels in history. Illegal aliens are increasingly giving up in immigration courts, in fear of mass deportations.
There have been more voluntary departures in 21 months of Trump than in 6 years of Obama, combined.
ALT Per TRAC records Voluntary Departure under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c is different from CBP Home and Project Homecoming self-returns.
Brian Clark retweeted
‼️ The PHONY "Daniel Sullivan" of Alaska who is running as a spoiler, has ONE campaign expense…
A law firm in DC called Caplin & Drysdale. Known for representing high-profile Democrats.
The Senior Counsel for that law firm is Trevor Potter.
Trevor Potter formed The Committee to Modernize Voter Registration (CMVR) in 2009 with none other than MARC ELIAS.
Their goals were more lenient voter laws and a modernized automated system using government databases to automatically register eligible voters (with an opt-out). 🤯
Potter is also a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institute.
Phony "Dan Sullivan" sent Trevor Potter’s firm 10K.
Brian Clark retweeted
Why doesn't Congress have a cap on nightly hotel rates like private sector companies have for their employees?
Comrade 5-star socialists sure living it up like capitalists with exorbitant campaign spending. OpenSecrets reports that the average U.S. lawmaker spends about $2.8M a year. Khanna spent nearly $100K on Hotels.com. Funny how capitalism is evil until someone else picks up the hotel tab. They hate capitalism almost as much as they love its perks. Some of these hotels cost more per night than what a blue-collar worker makes in a week. Marx in the streets, luxury in the sheets. And why did AOC's campaign also reported a series of payments totaling $18,725 to a psychiatrist in 2025?
Brian Clark retweeted
For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about:
🚨So here's the REAL story:
Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission.
Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in
Qatar by the CIA.
Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy.
It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”
Obama and Hillary committed TREASON!
THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not.
Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo.
Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal.
So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.
Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.
Brian Clark retweeted
And so it seems it has begun.
这女子叫Lulu Freistadt，她是“智能选举（Smart Elections）”组织的联合创始人兼执行董事。她表示自己从 2021 年起一直在纽约市担任投票站监督员（poll watcher）。
事件经过：
她提到昨天（投票期间）她在纽约布朗克斯（Bronx）的一个投票点做监督工作。
起初一切正常，投票人数与扫描的选票数量对得上，她本准备离开。
但随后她发现一件非常奇怪的事：所有的投票站工作人员（poll workers）都在清点并准备离开，而投票机却仍然开着、没有上锁、没有密封，选票也还没有被取出。
按照正常程序，每台投票机都应由指定的投票工作人员负责关闭、密封并取出选票。但现场的机器和选票完全处于未密封状态。
交涉与冲突：
当她坐下等待工作人员按规定处理选票时，协调员（coordinator）开始变得焦躁不安，并打电话给副首席书记官（deputy chief clerk）。对方告诉她必须离开。
她指出根据法规，投票监督员有权留在现场直到投票结束、选票被取出并放入密封容器中。
尽管她据理力争，但工作人员和警察还是要求她离开，现场只留下一名技术人员在无人监督的情况下关闭投票机。
结尾：她强调这种不符合规范的做法为作弊提供了可乘之机，并呼吁大家关注和转发。
Brian Clark retweeted
‘60 Minutes’ proudly unveiled its latest heartbreaking deportation exposé. The grieving family. The devastated children. The carefully arranged interviews. All the emotional ammunition needed to make immigration enforcement look like an act of unspeakable cruelty.
Then DHS General Counsel James Percival announced he'd pulled the actual immigration file.
Fifty-one fucking minutes after CBS promoted its masterpiece.
Imagine the sheer embarrassment.
CBS had an entire investigative-news operation producing this thing. Reporters, producers, editors, researchers, and presumably somebody whose job involves checking whether the story survives contact with the underlying evidence.
Percival had a file.
And that file, according to him, identified sexual orientation as Moussa Diawara's claimed reason for fearing persecution in Mali, while CBS emphasized his conversion to Christianity.
That's a discrepancy any competent investigative newsroom should have thoroughly examined.
It gets better.
CBS acknowledged that America had the legal authority to deport Diawara. His protection concerned removal to Mali. American authorities flew him to Ghana, whose government subsequently sent him to Mali.
Those distinctions apparently weren't nearly as exciting as another close-up of a grieving family.
And therein lies the magnificent absurdity of this whole production.
The legendary ‘60 Minutes.’ The gold standard of investigative television. The institution that interrogates presidents, confronts corporations, and prides itself on uncovering what powerful people desperately want concealed.
Yet its carefully packaged immigration tragedy was publicly challenged by a government lawyer who said he'd done something apparently revolutionary in modern television journalism.
He checked the fucking paperwork.
CBS spent all that effort assembling a prime-time emotional spectacle, only to discover that inconvenient questions can survive the editing room.
America's premier investigative-news program managed to last roughly 51 minutes before somebody investigated the investigators.
Hell, the stopwatch in the ‘60 Minutes’ logo has a longer attention span than its fact-checkers apparently did.
(article below)
Brian Clark retweeted
It's been months that I keep saying Hitler was far left. Every time, thousands of clowns show up in my replies to give me history lessons.
So I made a video to answer all these low IQ takes at once.
Topic closed. Next.
Brian Clark retweeted
Why isn't this the lead story on every news outlet, both broadcast and cable?
The citizens need to know why they need to work two or three jobs to survive
Brian Clark retweeted
It’s not every day you stumble across a recording in which U.S. citizens discuss plans to declare the federal government illegitimate.
Here’s one particularly alarming excerpt:
“If the federal government’s deemed to be illegitimate … then the governors become the leading governing authority under the current republic framework of our Constitution.”
And then there’s this one:
“I really want to emphasize this is not a concept for a secession. No one is talking about leaving the United States.”
Of course they’re not “talking about leaving the United States”; they’re talking about a planned transfer of governing authority outside the constitutional process—replacing the authority of the federal government with governors and outside networks.
I hope this turns out to be a deep fake or a bad practical joke—because if it’s real, it’s unbelievably frightening.
Either way, it’s a good reminder to vote carefully in November.
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨
Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone.
The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.
R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.
R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative.
Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.
It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.
You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.
Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.
As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.
Important to understand:
The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
Brian Clark retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Tad Jude just dropped the political ad of the cycle in Minnesota.
You need to watch every second of this. It’s time to take our state back, Minnesota!
Brian Clark retweeted
Good point
France has FREE health care, paid parental leave, paid family leave, FREE child care, FREE preschool, 5 weeks paid vacation, a 35 hour work week, generous unemployment and housing benefits, and heavily subsidized higher education.
Everything the left says they want AND THEY'RE STILL PROTESTING AND BURNING SHIT DOWN.
