BCG retweeted
Estonian authorities said Russia’s spy agency GRU was behind a failed attempt to cause an explosion at facilities owned by the drone producer Threod Systems in the early hours of Saturday. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
BCG retweeted
8 detained after GRU-linked arson at Estonian drone company Threod Systems news.err.ee/1610196722/8-det…
Not sure why people are ganging up on @VettedPodcast and @LegacyProgramVP when Beatriz herself disclosed publicly that this extortion had occurred. The Vetted video was primarily about Herrera and has since been said to have been a misunderstanding. So how did that video put her in danger when she herself was talking about the extortion/blackmail publicly prior to this, of her own volition?
4
10
762
So in that context wouldn’t she have put herself in danger by talking about it on a public platform? Makes zero sense to keep blaming others only trying to help, even if there had been misunderstandings. Regardless of any feelings about her, we should all support her while letting law enforcement handle the rest.
And oh, somebody also extorted/blackmailed me to post a similar statement on Battista. Like real blackmail. I think there are far darker forces in the background than most of you can imagine.
1
2
100
BCG retweeted
GRU tried to blow up an Estonian drone company. Border crossings with Russia closed.
Following clear evidence that Russia’s military intelligence service GRU, ordered a sabotage attack against an Estonian defence industry company, Estonia will close all Estonian-Russian border crossing points as of 1 December.
Russia must understand that hostile actions against Estonia come with consequences. Attempts to intimidate, destabilise, or undermine our security will not go unanswered.
Closing the border crossings will reduce Russia’s ability to conduct hostile activities in Estonia and strengthen our efforts to prevent sanctions circumvention.
I have informed my Finnish, Latvian, and Lithuanian counterparts of this decision.
@uncertainvector any idea if Caison Best has ever heard of these technologies that have been sitting in open sources since late 90s and early 2000s?
2013, “News reports from China last week touted the country's work on a “cloaking” technology that uses a hexagonal array of glass-like panels to bend light around an object, obscuring it from view as though hidden by an invisibility cloak. Experts say the technology is legit -- and not unlike American and European projects from the past few years.”
“The general public … might not hear about how far the U.S. has really come, because it is and should remain classified," firearms expert Chris Sajnog, a former Navy SEAL, told FoxNews. Other countries are still playing catch-up -- but they're closing the gap.”
Probably a good reason as to why AARO did not feel they needed to disclose to Caison what the “crystalline potato” was and who it might belong to. Also, what better way to test emerging stealth technologies stolen from the U.S., than over sovereign U.S. territory and the Navy’s geographical training area carveouts? What do you think the full dangers of something like multi spectral, to include even optical INVISIBILITY, drones/balloons are, for our pilots? I thinks there is good indication we would not put our own pilots in danger like that, so maybe we can take a bold guess of who’s actually doing this.
How about Caison Best’s witness account? Is the “crystalline potato” that he saw also nothing?
“…hexagonal array of glass-like panels, which obscure the object from view by bending light around it.”
3
2
112
@uncertainvector is it not a good indication that the platform that Caison Best and the others witnessed over Cheyenne Mountain that “suddenly disappeared,” and didn’t have visible wings or visible means of propulsion, that it could be indicative of a balloon/aerostat or a ducted fan UAV (Magnus and Coandă effects for example) that was outfitted with these emerging “hexagonal glass-like” stealth panels? I would say yes.
1
21
What better way to test emerging stealth capabilities which were stolen from the U.S., than over sovereign U.S.? Thanks Lacatski and Phillips for giving us disclosure, albeit of a human nature, and literally nobody being capable of reading between the lines and putting two and two together. #UAP
And what about an SES with 45 years of combined military and federal civilian service? I’m sure he knows nothing about defense capabilities too?
1
68
BCG retweeted
Iran targets US military base in Bahrain with drone attack bbc.in/4AsQXME
BCG retweeted
Three ships struck by drones in Black Sea near Romanian shipping canal, PM says reut.rs/4C34VGv
BCG retweeted
MORE: Russian President Vladimir Putin is committed to his original war aim of destroying NATO in order to reassert Russia’s control over its perceived sphere of influence in Europe and beyond.
ISW continues to assess that Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022 not because he believed that NATO threatened Russia, but rather because he wanted to reassert control over former Soviet states and reestablish Russia as a great power.
NEW: US proposals for Ukraine's possible NATO membership are implicit rejections of Russian demands to stop NATO expansion and reform the European security architecture. Moscow not only remains committed to its original 2021 ultimatums to the United States and NATO but is also reportedly expanding its demands in order to completely dismantle the post-Cold War security architecture in Europe. (1/2)
BCG retweeted
Trump, Xi and Putin to meet Thursday, discuss nukes politi.co/4jefC1E
Is allowing people to believe their experiences are extraterrestrial/nonhuman really better than telling them the truth about how adversaries have researched and developed NLWs encompassing harmful artificial ball lighting, DEWs, memory manipulation, weaponized belief systems/ culture, and neuroweapons that target the human mind/brain/nervous system? Why should I have to live my life suffering with that reality? Why don’t the LLNL nuclear scientists and their families deserve answers and justice after all these decades? What about AAWSAP personnel and their families, who described the same experiences involving psychological terrorism and even physical harm? What about all the being mocked and ridiculed? What about Bennewitz? Anyone else who has had fabricated “experiences?”
Truly, what could be more “sobering” than that? Is this why you all think people supposedly “can’t handle the truth?” Because it wasn’t extraterrestrial/nonhuman at all, but something far more sinisterly HUMAN. Human beings capable of exploiting our beliefs, fears, and perceptions so effectively that we are still living with the consequences of that decades later?
Shouldn’t we be more concerned with uncovering that, pushing for some transparency on it, protecting those affected, those who could be targeted in the future, protecting our beliefs, religion, and culture, and demanding at least SOME accountability, than preserving a comforting narrative based on decades of LIES that most would prefer to be true?
Is this partially why the #Vatican released, “Norm’s for Proceeding in the Discernment of Alleged Supernatural Phenomena: At the same time, in some events of alleged supernatural origin, there are serious critical issues that are detrimental to the faithful; in these situations, the Church must respond with utmost pastoral solicitude. In particular, I am thinking of the use of such phenomenon to gain “profit, power, fame, social recognition, or other personal interest” (II, Art. 15, 4°)—even possibly extending to the commission of gravely immoral acts (cf. II, Art.15, 5°) or the use of these phenomena “as a means of or pretext for exerting control over people or carrying out abuses” (II, Art. 16).”
Deliberate manipulation and attacks on human belief and religion themselves and the threat of a false religion and cults being created due to those fabrications. Who knows if some experiences can be true? The problem is if ANY are fabricated, how do you teach people to be able to tell the difference between them?
@travisstaylor1 @jaystratton @LueElizondo @GarryPNolan @dwpasulka
1
1
136
“2023年4月21日，北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室朱皕教授课题组在Nature Communications期刊在线发表题为Cross-stage neural pattern similarity in the hippocampus predicts false memory derived from post-event inaccurate information的研究论文，揭示虚假信息对人脑记忆的影响”
“It is commonly said, "what you see is what you get, and what you hear is what you believe." However, people often cannot perfectly distinguish between different sources of information in their memory, which leads to false memories. The famous child psychologist Piaget once mentioned, "I was sitting in the stroller, ... a man tried to kidnap me... my nanny bravely tried to protect me... I could still see the whole scene... and when I was about fifteen years old, ... she (the nanny) wanted to confess her past mistakes... she fabricated the whole story... Therefore, I definitely heard this story when I was a child, and my parents also believed this story and projected it into the past in the form of visual memory; this is a memory of memory, but it is a false memory" (Piaget, 1962).”
“In recent years, with the rapid development of social media, false information has been able to spread widely and quickly on the internet, and the impact of false information on personal physical and mental health, social and political economy has received unprecedented attention. The misinformation effect refers to the change of the original event memory due to false information after the event (Schacter & Loftus, 2013, Nat. Neurosci.). It includes three stages: first, the individual sees an event, then accepts false information afterwards, and finally completes a memory test targeting the original event (Figure 1). Researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States, used light genetic techniques to implant false memories into the hippocampus of mouse brains (Ramirez et al., 2013, Science). Our previous study of more than two hundred Chinese university students found that false information triggers false memories related to the volume of the hippocampus in the human brain (Zhu et al., 2016). However, it is still unclear why false information triggers false memories, and we do not know how the memory representations of the hippocampus change during the three stages of witnessing the original event, accepting false information, and completing the memory test.”
“Therefore, this study adopted functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain imaging technology and multi-modal pattern analysis methods based on models to calculate the neural pattern similarity of the hippocampus in the human brain during different memory stages, revealing the neural mechanism by which false and true information memory representations compete with each other in the hippocampus and lead to false memories (Figure 2). The study found that the hippocampus in the human brain simultaneously has memory traces of original events and false information during the memory test phase. Moreover, the hippocampus of each individual's brain can only predict their own false memory behavior based on the memory representation of false information. Furthermore, when the memory traces of false information in the hippocampus are stronger than those of original events, this memory signal difference can trigger monitoring in the outer prefrontal cortex of the brain. This study systematically explains the brain mechanisms that induce human false memories caused by false information, supporting and extending the multiple traces theory of learning memory and the activation monitoring theory, and has important scientific significance for understanding the essence of memory reconstruction in the human brain and important application value for education and law.”
2
