On the "scam" accusation, let's be precise. A scam would have looked like this: launch our own token, snipe 90% of supply like teams do, build the product, bring in the partners and marketing we already had lined up, then sell into our own community. We could have done exactly that, easily. Instead we accepted $BERRY, a token we did not launch, with supply we don't control, because the community brought us attention and momentum, not because we needed the fees. That choice is the opposite of the playbook you're accusing us of running. On Berry OTC, since the question keeps coming up: it's not built to dump supply. It's built so anyone, including us, can sell or trade illiquid positions peer-to-peer, at an agreed price, without slippage or market impact. That's the whole design. $6k sold did not move the price, because BERRY has been getting real volume, the kind that absorbs a sale like that without blinking. And on raising CMC/CG listing costs from the community, no. We don't fund operational costs by asking holders for money. We covered it ourselves. Every transaction is on-chain. Go look. We're continuing to build.

@base just introduced B20, a native standard for 1:1 backed tokenized assets on-chain. We’re building for it. Berry Juicer already turns idle token supply into yield. B20 extends what “idle supply” can mean, tokenized assets that can be put to work in DeFi instead of sitting still. We’re designing Juicer support so B20-backed assets can earn through the same harvest mechanism powering Berry Juicer today. This sits alongside everything already on our roadmap, OTC, Pools, Lend, and Intel. B20 is a new surface to build on, not a detour.

@bankrbot skill for agents coming soon too. We have submitted the PR Succesfully. 👀

Hey its a fake wallet/contract. Scammers have registered berryfinances.base.eth and deployed a bankr token via it (the fees are also not pointed to us). It's not us, our wallet is - berryfinance.base.eth as mentioned in our earlier post. BEWARE! Do not fall for scams.