Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
Systematic review asks: What works?
Scoping review asks: What exists?
Many researchers confuse the two!
---------------------------------------
Learn in more detail in this accredited course:
🔗 systematicreview.razia-alian…
----------------------------------------
Here's when a scoping review makes sense:
— You're exploring an emerging area
— You want to identify what research methods people are using
— You need to clarify how a concept is being defined
— You want to spot where the research gaps are
Stick with systematic reviews when:
— You have a focused question
— You need to inform policy or practice decisions
— You want to compare interventions
— Critical appraisal matters for your question
---
1/6
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
For 20 years, WCHRI has been filling critical gaps in women’s and children’s health research — powered by partnership and collaboration.
As we mark this milestone, executive director Sandra Davidge reflects on why this work matters now more than ever.
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
Please check our Editorial on the importance of monitoring maternal cholesterol, at @ajogmfm!
Maternal cholesterol matters: it is time for routine monitoring sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
@BioSciAmanda
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
During #HeartMonth it is important we recognize what needs to change in our clinical trials
📌include more women in trials
📌report the analysis by sex: even if no difference, we need to know that
#goredforwomen #inclusion #clinicaltrials @WHA @BaimInstitute @GoRedForWomen
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
WCHRI trainee Angie Stokes in @ualbertaScience investigated how Aspirin reduces the risk of preeclampsia. Her research aimed to improve pregnancy outcomes for women at high risk of this serious condition.
Learn more about her @stollerykids and @albertawomens-funded work:
wchri.org/our-impact/summer-…
Stokes was supervised by @DavidgeLab in @UAlberta_FoMD.
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
PhD student: “I’ve had an idea and I think it’s pretty awesome…”
PhD supervisor:
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
Join us for a learning session on how to prepare your abstract for WCHRI Research Day. We will review the purpose of an abstract, discuss how to prepare a research abstract, and guide you through the steps to creating a compelling abstract.
Register here:
wchri.org/events/calendar-of…
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
WCHRI trainee Amanda de Oliveira received the prestigious Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship to study why pre-eclampsia doubles long-term heart disease risk in women.
Learn more about how the project builds on funding from @StolleryKids & @abwomenshealth: ualberta.ca/folio/2024/06/pr…
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
4% of research & development budgets are spent on women's health.
Only 1% is spent outside of women's cancers.
Failure to support women's health research costs women their lives.
nature.com/articles/d43747-0…
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
Three scientist mothers call for a change in how conference childcare costs are reimbursed, drawing on their personal experiences go.nature.com/3KfWZIB
I’m thrilled to announce that I’ve been awarded a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship from @CIHR_IRSC to support my research in women’s health at the @UAlberta_FoMD with @DavidgeLab. 🥳🥳🥳
Today, Ministers Holland and Champagne announced the recipients of the 2024 #VanierCanada and #BantingCanada awards.
These talented doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers are the future leaders of innovation and research excellence in Canada.
canada.ca/en/institutes-heal…
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
Getting praise for the abstract you wrote 35 seconds before the conference submission deadline
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
‘their stipends might not cover all of their expenses… AND so many PhD students don’t even get funding’
Amanda Almeida de Oliveira retweeted
Me: “congrats on the article! I’ve added it to the reading list”
The reading list:




















