To this joy and triumph in October 2026 over retracting the very results you had trumpeted loudly just over a year earlier. Even if the anomolies are real and even if they did not appear until after April 7, how do you go from interpreting the data (however flawed they might be or might have been) as they did with the conclusions they came to in their social media posts, the paper itself, the discussion, the podcasts, the documentary to concluding that the data issues with Cleerly caused everything? Again, in April 2025, they interpreted the data they had and then made the conclusions they did and the integrity of the data had zero impact on it. In fact, if they had been awake and competent, they would have either not published the data or they would have recognized that their initial conclusions were unsupportable. And yet, they did not begin to recognize how idiotic their initial conclusions were until after the deluge of criticism came at them over how they could see what they were seeing and concluding what they were concluding when the data showed nothing of the sort. So the issues of the data and the Cleerly analysis are just a massive distraction from the real issue which is how they could have reached their initial conclusions do confidently and so wrongly. And when faced with how wrong they were, they did not own up to the incompetence and instead blamed the Cleerly data which again has nothing to do with their initial interpretations/conclusions. They just missed it. And they missed it because they are true believers and have no ability to practice science with a shred of skill or competence. They are not scientists. They are propogandists.