I talk about #ICP and Caffeine ☕ LP farming on @maxfilabs 🖨️

Joined January 2022
You can currently buy $ICP for half the pre-sale price at 1000x the network's progress & adoption WE are the VCs now, and patience is the price we have to pay for the discount 👍
28
44
3
308
24,390
Alex (BCP) retweeted
There is great progress behind the scenes, but in the business world, especially with governments, things take time because its done thoroughly and by respecting everyone's requirements. Rome wasn't built in a day :)
22
68
4
272
3,491
Alex (BCP) retweeted
Replying to @cizi31
The fact that $NEAR fans are more upset with Dom for calling out theft than they are upset with Near’s founder for stealing $ICP tech is wild
6
15
2
101
1,087
internet-computer:native ♾ Built Different😎 Keep it Thuggy 👊
5
13
4
53
1,568
Alex (BCP) retweeted
XRP Ledger is on OISY, along with your other favorite networks
5
29
1
111
2,154
Alex (BCP) retweeted
$ICP fam, here's part 2: The full timeline of the $NEAR "unique" tech, with receipts. Let me know what you think in the comments. RT for visibility 👌
19
88
12
255
12,202
Alex (BCP) retweeted
BambooHR, the HR software used by 30,000 businesses, went offline for more than six hours on October 21 to patch the PHP2Shell flaw. DFINITY switched its own HR to Open HR on the Internet Computer three weeks earlier. @dfinity
1
32
1
165
4,519
Is NEAR in trouble? 🚨 Dominic Williams (@dominic_w) says Near Intents was built on patented DFINITY technology, brought over by a former employee and used for over two years without a license. Now NEAR is quietly rolling it back on GitHub, and legal action may be next. #ICP
9
42
2
235
5,992
Alex (BCP) retweeted
$NEAR accuses $ICP of spreading FUD and lies, but the factual reality says otherwise. Everything @dominic_w says checks out against public receipts online. NEAR's own records show where their "unique" tech came from. Here's the timeline: 1/16 👇
44
136
13
408
14,611
Alex (BCP) retweeted
Replying to @hosseeb @grok
The algorithm NEAR has been running on for two and a half years is patented. They also took vetKeys, it looks like, but that's not. Obviously if you're mining the repos, research, and work of competitors, without talking to them, referencing them, etc, this is a risk you take.
31
100
6
413
17,031
Alex (BCP) retweeted
Did NEAR Intents use unlicensed DFINITY tech? 🚨 @dominic_w says NEAR built its star product on stolen DFINITY research NEAR's own docs link straight to the DFINITY paper (spotted by @ajki76) 👇 #ICP
13
67
7
272
7,715
internet-computer:native fixes real world issues and problems. No reason it’s trading under $3
The internet just broke 🚨 @FBICyberDiv told companies to patch PHP, the language behind ~7 in 10 websites, or take their sites offline. @bamboohr went dark for 6 hours. On @dfinity's Internet Computer, a flaw like this gets fixed once, for every app 👇 #ICP
12
39
1,012
Alex (BCP) retweeted
$ICP fam, here's everything we know about the $NEAR situation, based on everything I could find publicly. RT for visibility, and consider watching it on YT 👌
14
107
7
307
6,505
Alex (BCP) retweeted
Replying to @crypt0max_
I mean, for sure, they took proprietary tech to get a jump on the market. The need to pay a license fee to DFINITY at the minimum to resolve this. But they also caused colossal harm.
32
50
11
309
8,795
$NEAR holders, you may wanna watch this one ⏳
Did NEAR Intents use unlicensed DFINITY tech? 🚨 @dominic_w says NEAR built its star product on stolen DFINITY research NEAR's own docs link straight to the DFINITY paper (spotted by @ajki76) 👇 #ICP
3
33
155
2,261
🚨DFINITY FOUNDER ALLEGES NEAR INTENTS STOLE PROPRIETARY CHAIN KEY TECH! DFINITY founder @dominic_w claims a key component of NEAR Intents relies on proprietary DFINITY threshold ECDSA (Chain Key) cryptography, licensed only for the Internet Computer. This follows his post yesterday questioning NEAR’s Confidential Intents, which he said runs on a separate permissioned chain with no real cryptography behind the privacy claims. He points to a 2022 DFINITY paper, GitHub activity showing NEAR attempting an emergency downgrade after ~2.5 years, and the involvement of a former DFINITY employee fired in 2021. Williams says the system is not decentralized and flags legal implications.
37
116
9
523
35,044
Did NEAR Intents use unlicensed DFINITY tech? 🚨 @dominic_w says NEAR built its star product on stolen DFINITY research NEAR's own docs link straight to the DFINITY paper (spotted by @ajki76) 👇 #ICP
13
67
7
272
7,715
Alex (BCP) retweeted
Someone just drew this to my attention. It's a post from NEAR, presumably in response to my previous post, and in fairness it must be shared. xitter.cf/NEARProtocol/status/21… Among the findings they have a dashboard that shows their server cluster now has 16, not 8 nodes as I was informed, and they are run by different parties. This does not, of course, reduce concerns about backdoors, the ability of NEAR to upgrade the software of those "MPC" nodes directly and the ability to use such software updates to extract the key shares if they wished, the use of a trusted dealer to distribute the private key shares in the first place, and all of the other things that a truly decentralized setup addresses. That being said: 1) Sharing keys over 16 nodes is much better than over 8 (we prefer around 50). 2) They state that the operators of these nodes include Sovereign AI, Bitwise, Nansen, Greenfield, Everstake, Near One, and Luganodes, which is good. It's not clear if there are 16 different operators though, which is what you want. 3) They reference a strong technical description of their TEE architecture github.com/near/mpc/blob/mai…. So long as this is implemented on the nodes, and the node operators are actively using attestation to check the software NEAR is running on these nodes, that reduces the risks involved. I am not aware of when they moved from 8 nodes to 16. None of this reduces our key concern that their system has been powered by our proprietary tech all this time. Further, their post also talks about another thing they have released in 2025: CKD, or Confidential Key Derivation. This is basically vetKeys, an Internet Computer technology that does exactly the same thing, and it works the same way too!! We published how to do this in 2023: eprint.iacr.org/2023/616 However, this isn't protected afaik, so they have no worries there, but they should have contacted us first AND referenced our work. That's the respectable way to work in the fields of computer science and open source. We wish NEAR well, but they cannot just steal proprietary DFINITY tech.
53
83
14
361
25,130
How to maximize your crypto earnings with @MAXFILABS In this episode @YaBonksOfficial & @DaoKingdom break down: - the latest updates - how the protocol works - why MaxFi earns ~5-10x what other LP managers do with a fraction of their TVL
18
747
Alex (BCP) retweeted
I remember a cryptocurrency space that used to have higher ideals. Satoshi did not set out to “solve users’ problems today.” What Sandeep would call “larpers” were the early adopters from 2012 and before, whom Satoshi won over, and who set out to establish the field we’re all in today. None of them built pragmatic solutions. There was nothing pragmatic about Ethereum. Or Zcash. It was due to their complete disregard for pragmatism that we’ve made it this far (scalable BFT, fast ZK) and we now stand to solve **tomorrow’s** problems (censorship, surveillance). The f*** outta here with “today’s problems.”
What @ilblackdragon and NEAR team has built is a pragmatic solution which solves users’ problems “today” and such solutions win the users, technically perfect solutions win larpers (that too for a short time, you can never satisfy them for long)
8
14
1
85
5,386