Nathan P. retweeted
How is
“here, enjoy this 50 year mortgage”
different from
“you will own nothing and you will like it”
Nathan P. retweeted
Just got off the phone with Washington State.
In one week, I’ll be flying to Washington State to help collect signatures to require proof of citizenship in order to register to vote.
If Republicans in Congress won’t act, then we must take action at the state level.
Forward.
Nathan P. retweeted
Hey, guys... we need to talk..
I recently lost a very good friend of mine and mentor to suicide.. I felt compelled to talk about it here.
If you would be kind enough to like, subscribe, and share I would be gratful for you.
We have to do something about this
youtu.be/1VLv2EvJ18Y
Nathan P. retweeted
On this day 34 years ago the greatest Supreme Court Justice of this century, Clarence Thomas, was appointed and officially replaced Justice Thurgood Marshall.
He has a super power no other justices seem to have - he can read the Constitution and apply legal theory based on what it says. Magic...
#ClarenceThomas #ideal #constitution #GOAT
Nathan P. retweeted
Our favorite thing about sports ball is having less people in the woods on game day.
Nathan P. retweeted
With the pending government shutdown approaching, the White House has made it clear they will permanently lay off nonessential workers in the federal government.
Being that the entire ATF is nonessential, here is our proposal...
Nathan P. retweeted
This Constitution Day...We Break the NFA!! Swing by to see why... 😎
franklinarmory.com/antithesi… #ConstitutionDay #2A #Antithesis
Nathan P. retweeted
Tonight, Congress will vote to lower the age to prosecute minors as adults from 16 down to 14 in DC.
Let me get this straight:
Congress wants to prosecute 14 yr. olds as adults, but they don’t want to prosecute adults who sexually abuse 14 year olds?
Release the Epstein files.
Nathan P. retweeted
Message to @AGPamBondi:
Nathan P. retweeted
“Hate speech” is a term used by those in power to describe thoughts they don’t want spoken. It’s antithetical to the First Amendment.
Nathan P. retweeted
Get rid of her. Today. This is insane. Conservatives have fought for decades for the right to refuse service to anyone. We won that fight. Now Pam Bondi wants to roll it all back for no reason. The employee who didn’t print the flyer was already fired by his employer. This stuff is being handled successfully through free speech and free markets. This is totally gratuitous and pointless. We need the AG focused on bringing down the left wing terror cells, not prosecuting Office Depot for God’s sake.
Nathan P. retweeted
I have no thoughtful words to de-escalate the situation. You know I've tried.
History is quite clear what happens when we get here.
Defend yourselves.
Nathan P. retweeted
Yes. You do. Watch it.
This is reality. This is what they have planned for you. You can bend the knee in fear, or you can stand in the shield wall.
Nathan P. retweeted
If people are truly insane and mentally defective, they should be locked away and the key thrown away. If they can't function in a society without the fear of them harming people, they shouldn't be walking amongst the free in the first place. The firearm is irrelevant, because I have a gun.
Gun control is not only tyrannical, it's a victim's game and mentality. I choose to not worry about who has guns and who doesn't, because I have my own gun. That's why I have a gun, and that's why I train with my gun. I don't carry it to say that I have it. I carry it to use it if I need to.
Do you intend to do me harm without cause? Why? Sounds like you're mentally unstable, and you should probably be locked away and the key thrown away, or shot if you are trying to hurt people without cause. If you try to do me harm and aren't locked away, I have a gun. If I fail, that's my fault not the rest of society's, and that person shouldn't have been on the street anyway. My security isn't your problem.
Them having a gun didn't matter in the slightest, because criminals already don't care about the law, anyway, and will just use something else to be a criminal...right? Regardless, I have a gun.
In summary: I have a gun. I don't care who else does or doesn't have guns. I would like for us to stop justifying the continuous removal of guns to satisfy "doing something", because it's a never-ending cycle of the same arguments. Arm more people, afford them the ability to defend themselves, and the problem solves itself.






























