Bold Browser (@BoldBrowser) header
Bold Browser (@BoldBrowser) profile picture

Privacy-respecting browser without a token or adware. Work in progress! Discord: https://nitter.gq/t.co/vWZvG6OfY8 Github: https://nitter.gq/t.co/rhWgbXmv7G

Joined June 2020
Photo by Bold Browser (@BoldBrowser)Photo by Bold Browser (@BoldBrowser)Photo by Bold Browser (@BoldBrowser)Photo by Bold Browser (@BoldBrowser)Photo by Bold Browser (@BoldBrowser)Photo by Bold Browser (@BoldBrowser)
Why we removed our existing Github repos: The contents of the forks were being cherry-picked for references to the original browser. Those were then used in legal threats against one of our community devs to claim they're "purposefully causing financial damage to the creator"
8
3
3
43
Whoever would assume that the threats were "highly standard/normal" may not have considered that one specific dev may have been picked out (as the only non-anon contributor) and may have been presented as a black-hat operator "clearly" sabotaging their multi-million dollar corp.
1
1
1
17
Disclaimer: The above is entirely hypothetical and not about any party in particular. We wanted to include this disclaimer earlier but couldn't due to Twitter's character limit.
3
1
13
Remember to change a Github repository's description after clicking the "Fork" button Or the original's author might use it as "Exhibit A" to try and claim financial damages from you for "purposefully misleading their audience". Trust me on this one.
4
10
1
38
A company shouldn't advertise itself as privacy and anonymity respecting if they support sending legal threats to the only non-anonymous contributor of an open-source project. Legal Disclaimer: this tweet is about nothing/noone in particular.
2
14
4
97
Spoke with the @BoldBrowser community and the new Twitter owner and Github owner promptly changed their project title and removed all references to that other browser. I thank them for their quick action to help protect their non-anonymous contributors from legal threats.
2
6
1
29
We are also removing references to a browser that we previously mentioned from our tweets, as a gesture of goodwill to those who send legal threats to open source contributors.
4
5
1
59
Due to legal threats sent to one of our community members by a certain party, specifically looking to harm them financially because of what this browser is forked from, we are immediately changing the name and removing all association to "the browser that shall not be named".
25
38
29
266
Brave is keeping the referral links, but is fixing the 'mistake' in making them auto-populate. Some developers have had enough and are forking an alternative—scrapping the referrals. decrypt.co/31692/developers-… @BraverBrowser @brave
5
7
1
32
Bold Browser retweeted
ICYMI: People are mad at @brave. Devs are proposing a fork. It all stems from an auto-generated referral link in the URL bar. @BradyDale explains coindesk.com/brave-browsers-…
7
15
6
35
Bold Browser retweeted
2
3
12
A web browser shouldn't riddle you with add-on products for making money or cryptocurrencies.
5
2
17
You can use add-ons for that! The browser itself should be clean from any business models.
1
1
16
The power of open-source means we can fix this.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
2
12