Beegor (@Bucleor) header
Beegor (@Bucleor) profile picture
Joined August 2009
Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)Photo by Beegor (@Bucleor)
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
21,794
58,195
20,199
313,030
59,626,335
Beegor retweeted
JUST IN: 🇮🇱 🇮🇷 The head of Mossad just admitted that Israel was behind the protests in Iran. Told you so. Mossad was literally posting online during the protests that they were in the field. The U.S. also admitted that the currency collapse that preceded the protests was intentionally done by them. Almost everything mainstream media and politicians tell you about Iran is a lie.
488
5,548
153
15,320
303,325
It's truly wild how many EU residents don't know they don't live in a democracy and pretend they're some kind of beacon of democracy, when their elections are rigged, their media is hyper-sterilized of dissent from EUC positions, and their governments aren't even sovereign.
You can cancel an election and ban the winner from running (Romania), you can ban your opponents from ever running again (Hungary), you can threaten to ban the main opposition party and subject it to relentless investigations by the secret police (Germany), you can threaten a ban on the leading presidential candidate and make them wear an ankle monitor (France), every member of your circle can be investigated for corruption (Spain), you can try and cancel local elections because you will lose them (Britain), and you can storm the constitutional court with riot police because you want to control it (Poland). You can just do all these things. The secret is you just have to be on the right side of the European Commission.
1
27
These are the ppl Trump sends your hard earned money to
Who could imagine that this scene—a Palestinian child being dragged by a despicable Israeli settler
23
103
1
595
8,302
This is how Ukrainian men are dragged out of vehicles. They are grabbed off the streets, in shops, in apartment building entrances, and in courtyards, like animals. This is not mobilization; it’s a safari.
83
429
62
810
12,132
Every country the US has attacked in the 21st century, and every president who authorized the attacks.
52
481
30
1,029
22,604
There are many uniquely bizarre aspects to the US/Israel relationship but the most bizarre is how relfexively pro-Israel Americans will side with that *foreign country* even when they attack, beat, persecute or kill their own fellow Americans. It's extra surreal, and disgusting, watching politicians who call themselves "America First" -- like Mike Huckabee -- do this.
Ambassador Huckabee, this is unreleased video of an American who was beaten almost to death last week by Israeli settlers. You know his name because he came to you for help, but you blew him off. That’s disgraceful. Do your job. @GovMikeHuckabee @SecRubio @davidamilstein @WhiteHouse
217
2,334
39
11,809
272,509
𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗔𝗟𝗪𝗔𝗬𝗦 𝗟𝗘𝗗. 𝗜𝗧 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗪𝗔𝗬. Look at these two charts. Same data, share of world GDP over two thousand years. The first one is the version you usually see. Year 1 to 1500 squeezed into a tiny corner, then 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950, 1973, 2003 spread out like each one mattered as much as a whole millennium. Suddenly the West looks like it has been on top half the time. The second chart puts time on a fair scale. And the story changes. 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗠𝗢𝗦𝗧 𝗢𝗙 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬, 𝗔𝗦𝗜𝗔 𝗪𝗔𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗟𝗗 𝗘𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗢𝗠𝗬 India and China together were around half of global output for most of the last two thousand years. Western Europe hovered around ten percent. The USA was barely a line on the floor until the 1800s. Then came a short window. Industrialisation, colonies, opium wars, unequal treaties, the drain of wealth out of India, a century of invasion and civil war in China. Asia's share collapsed. The West's shot up. On the fair chart, that Western peak is a spike. Roughly two hundred years. A blip. 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗪𝗘'𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗘𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗔 𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗘. 𝗜𝗧'𝗦 𝗔 𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗡. Look at the far right. China's red line is climbing again, India is starting to follow. To me that's not some threat out of nowhere. It's the world going back to how it looked for most of recorded history. I'm not saying the West did nothing. Science, industry, a lot came out of Europe. But how you draw the axis decides what people think is normal. And many in the West still think their two centuries on top are the natural order. They're not. They were the exception. Be informed, not entertained.
6
22
80
6,375
What happened? Poroshenko has called for Ukraine to begin peace talks following the attacks.
4
21
1
84
4,373
And there you have it.👇 The answer to why Ukraine’s brutal forced conscription continues: men being dragged from their homes, snatched off the streets, seized in cafés and hospitals, and shipped off to the front lines to kill and be killed. Because nobody wants to join the army voluntarily. Nobody. Not even with fixed terms of service and attractive salaries. A mere 8,500 people have signed contracts with the Ukrainian Armed Forces. That is not a recruitment success story. It is an absolute, humiliating failure. And when recruitment fails, only one option remains: coercion. Blind, brutal, merciless coercion. Call it what you will. Terror is another word for it. Funded by European taxpayers. Cheered on by those chanting “Slava Ukraini!” with all the fervor of a fascist rallying cry.
27
346
26
837
15,278
It is planned that all Ukrainians will be sent to the front lines. The Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian Parliament) issued a statement calling for the abolition of exemptions from mobilization for everyone. Exemptions should only be granted to the President, ministers, and members of parliament. In addition, Ukrainian Prime Minister Kuleba also gave a strong speech. According to him, "the survival of the state is at stake." Kuleba promised that the Ukrainian government would introduce a completely new mobilization model by December 1, 2026. Ukrainian cities will prepare for comprehensive defense, according to a decree by Zelensky.
46
88
14
213
12,166
Zelensky fans are the dumbest people on the planet. In Ukraine OFFICIALLY: - peace talks banned - borders closed - Zelensky office thieves - Zelensky wanna jail people for looking into corruption... Regular Ukrainians just get grabbed off the streets like animals. Zelensky sucks money straight out of regular Americans’ and Europeans’ pockets. Without audit. But some people still go “Zelensky is democracy.” Those ones need a paid therapist.
390
1,808
97
7,491
78,413
The illegal, CIA sponsored Maidan Coup in 2014 Ukraine spiralled into a brutal Civil War with Western Ukrainian Nazis unleashing a brutal assault against ethnic Russians in the East The architects and fathers of this catastrophe are the US and NATO
118
1,496
81
3,150
33,851
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov🇷🇺: ‘Over the past 500 years, all tragedies in the world originated in Europe or occurred owing to European policies: colonisation, the Crusades, the Crimean War, Napoleon, WW1, Hitler…’ After 300 years of slaughtering the peoples of the world and plundering the wealth of the global south to build the cities of Europe… Their empires crumbled in 1945. Since then, all they have had to offer the world is neocolonialism, uncritical vassalage to the United States, and now face being an afterthought and an irrelevance. Instead of recognising a new world exists where neocolonialism will not be tolerated, and prioritising economic rejuvenation via engagement with the rising powers of the 21st Century… Europe instead decides to invest its remaining and dwindling fortunes into the military-industrial complex to fight a war against Russia which none of their populations are remotely interested in…while the rest of the civilised world invests in trade and development. Europe had a last chance to look to the future, and instead violently jerked their heads 180 degrees back to the past.
Prof. Richard Wolff: ‘The only solution for Europe’s decline to re-orient themselves to the rest of the world. The only European country to have done that is RUSSIA🇷🇺.’ ‘World Wars One and Two were the culmination of European colonialism, in which the leading colonial powers slaughtered each other on a spectacular level that the world had never seen before or since, luckily speaking. But that was the end of all of those empires. Only one survived: the United States, protected by the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and by the limits of air power at that time, they came through. You know, Russia lost 27 million people in World War II. The United States death count: 400,000. No comparison between these two. The last 70 years have been the uni-empire. The United States inherited, benefited from, and consolidated, and became the global empire. With all the wealth that had been siphoned out of the so-called Global South to Europe, now going instead, here to the United States. The United States gave a portion of that back to Europe, a kind of debt, if you like, of having inherited all that empire, all that wealth, but they never gave the empire back to the Europeans, so they lost it, and now they’re losing what little bit they held on to, and it’s over. And the question is, can military Keynesianism replace the fantastic transfer of wealth in the 17th, 18th, and 19th century into the 20th? And my answer is no. There is no way that that domestic program can do for England or for Europe, all the colonial powers, what they lost. The only way to do that, ironically, would be for European countries to understand the need to reorient themselves to the rest of the world, and there’s only one country in Europe that has done that, and that’s Russia.’ Full interview in the quoted post 👇 @profwolff
727
4,331
318
10,649
346,534
Russia hit a bridge in Kyiv. Before the war only 2% of Ukraine’s bridges were in good shape. Bridges in Ukraine were built by the USSR 60 years ago. Never properly maintained. Money stolen for 35 years. Kyiv’s key bridges - Paton and Metro - were OFFICIALLY NON-FUNCTIONAL before the war. Banned from use, yet cars still drive on them. Repair money stolen. Before the war I talked to a man who designed bridges. He told me that 95% of Ukrainian bridges already outlived their service life long ago. On paper politicians keep extending it, but they do nothing. At some point bridges will all start collapsing. Now Zelensky and Klychko will blame the strikes. Lie. USSR built bridges. Politicians stole the repair money for 35 years. Devastation was already here before the war.
111
646
12
3,197
74,913
The West is a perpetual menace.
Why Did the British Come to Hate the Russians? – Jeffrey Sachs
1
186
The Federal Court of Canada ordered Canadian government to publish the classified parts of a report by a historian Alti Rodal on the resettlement of Nazi collaborators in the country. There are a lot of interesting things in it. American intelligence agencies provided transportation to Canada for the Nazi collaborators who worked as the agents for Washington. This was done using forged documents in 1953-1954, as part of a program conducted by a special unit of the U.S. Army in Europe. theglobeandmail.com/politics…
6
85
2
140
2,257
The West's narratives about the Ukraine war continue to be blown apart. There's almost none remaining which haven't been debunked in full by authoritative, first-hand sources.
I confirm the 2023 peace-treaty plan that was leaked to the FT. What the draft envisaged: - Russia withdraws its troops from most of the four oblasts it had just declared “annexed.” - The new line of demarcation runs roughly along the line as of February 24, 2022: Crimea and the part of Donbas that Russia controlled before the full-scale invasion. - Ukraine recognizes Russian control over Crimea. - Ukraine grants Russia an unobstructed land corridor to Crimea. - The ceasefire regime is guaranteed by NATO countries that provide protection for Ukraine. - Russia begins negotiations with the US on its own security guarantees. From my side, I’ll add a few insider details that few people know about. The plan was discussed NOT ONLY by Rodnyansky: the key figure was ABRAMOVICH. Moreover, Russia was ready to give up the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant as well. And the 300 billion in frozen assets was to go toward rebuilding all of Ukraine, that is, together with the occupied territories. As for Crimea: we were not required to recognize it as Russian, only to recognize Russia’s control over it. In other words, we acknowledge that right now it is under Russian control (which is how it is). We were also required to adopt a law banning the return of Crimea by military means. The land corridor to Crimea, a highway and a railway, was to be built at Russia’s expense. The hardest question was how to guard it. That is why the Russians were ready to give up Melitopol, but not Tokmak: they feared we would cut the corridor with artillery. Zelensky rejected this proposal at the time.
1
122
Je crois que personne ne se rend très bien compte du monde qu’il y avait à Paris pour manifester aujourd’hui. Je crois n’avoir jamais vu ça. #17octobre #24octobre
852
25,093
855
97,151
1,795,848
Beegor retweeted
Here we have Pierre de Gaulle, the grandson of Charles de Gaulle, saying: "It makes me smile when people talk about Russian interference because it suits our political elites and allows them to avoid telling the truth to the French people. Most of our politicians took part in the Young Leaders program, sponsored by the CIA"
90
2,880
152
6,484
96,139