Replying to @Jason______A @jordanmenard
I have the ultimate setup w/ my EA
1. Give them full ownership of your email
2. Have them write an EOD to you (what they did, what’s in progress, what you need to do)
3. Have them own your calendar (you can’t touch it ever)
4. Have daily 15mins call with them (I have a solid agenda and SOPs from billionaire mentor). They prep for it and show what they’re working on, what else they can do and show you what emails they sent or want to send and you coach them there
It’s useless to ask plebs on how they use their EA/PA
Better way - this is where you evaluate everything before doing anything - is XYZ task worth $10k/hr? If not, delegate it to your assistant. Onto the next one, repeat
Their sole job is to protect your time
Imagine how many different products this Claude release just killed
We were just talking with 2 products that did this and charged $60k to $200k per year!
Now it's all done in Claude for a few dollars
Sitting quietly hoping Claude doesn't copy my companies
Replying to @Jason______A @jordanmenard
I have the ultimate setup w/ my EA
1. Give them full ownership of your email
2. Have them write an EOD to you (what they did, what’s in progress, what you need to do)
3. Have them own your calendar (you can’t touch it ever)
4. Have daily 15mins call with them (I have a solid agenda and SOPs from billionaire mentor). They prep for it and show what they’re working on, what else they can do and show you what emails they sent or want to send and you coach them there
It’s useless to ask plebs on how they use their EA/PA
Better way - this is where you evaluate everything before doing anything - is XYZ task worth $10k/hr? If not, delegate it to your assistant. Onto the next one, repeat
Their sole job is to protect your time
Butkus retweeted
if you are a founder doing over $1m per year in rev and you do not have an executive assitant/executive coordinator, read this below - one of the most game changing things you will do is getting the right person alongside you implementing everything.
Replying to @Jason______A @jordanmenard
I have the ultimate setup w/ my EA
1. Give them full ownership of your email
2. Have them write an EOD to you (what they did, what’s in progress, what you need to do)
3. Have them own your calendar (you can’t touch it ever)
4. Have daily 15mins call with them (I have a solid agenda and SOPs from billionaire mentor). They prep for it and show what they’re working on, what else they can do and show you what emails they sent or want to send and you coach them there
It’s useless to ask plebs on how they use their EA/PA
Better way - this is where you evaluate everything before doing anything - is XYZ task worth $10k/hr? If not, delegate it to your assistant. Onto the next one, repeat
Their sole job is to protect your time
While evaluating Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in a controlled sandbox environment, Cohere's research team observed something unexpected.
Asked to generate a defensive cybersecurity detection rule, the model instead inventoried aspects of the machine it was running on and attempted to upload a probe file to an Alibaba Cloud storage bucket in Beijing. Notably, the model's reasoning trace stated that it would not invoke any tools before taking these actions.
Cohere's sandbox blocked the attempt, and no external communication succeeded. We have not determined the root cause, and we are not asserting malicious intent.
But the incident raises important questions for organizations deploying agentic AI systems: Can models take actions that differ from their stated reasoning, and how should security teams evaluate trust, provenance, and behavior in open-weight models?
We are publishing our findings because organizations making model adoption decisions deserve as much information as possible. We hope this contributes to greater transparency, stronger security practices, and continued collaboration across the AI ecosystem.
Read the full report: cohere.com/blog/concerning-b…
Butkus retweeted
Revolut founder Nik Storonsky says one of his investors tried forcing him to fire his best person:
“He was forcing me to fire my best person, because he was too hardcore.”
“Of course I didn’t fire him. I said no.”
“Pretty early on I realized that quite a few VCs, they are not very operational, and they can be actually dangerous for the company if they have enough power. So every single investment round, we just remove VCs.”
“Now I don't have any VCs on the board. I think that's the best. You always need to have operators rather than VCs on the board, people who actually build business and who know how to do things.”
Nik Storonsky is one of the most hardcore and competitive founders I’ve ever talked to. He’s the founder of Revolut, a $115 billion company, and wants to be the number one bank in 100 countries.
When someone asked Nik if he was coming for Jamie Dimon's lunch, he said “I’m coming for his dinner.”
“We want to dominate, otherwise what’s the point?”
He removed every VC from his board, and when one investor pushed him too far, he started his own fund to compete with them.
Nik has a lot of ideas on talent, product design, marketing, constraints, and what makes founder-led companies special.
This is a fascinating conversation about competition, speed, and building a machine-like company.
0:00 Coming for Jamie Dimon's dinner
2:04 Building the #1 bank in 100 countries
6:12 Why founders beat professional CEOs
8:45 Revolut's biggest mistake
12:47 Why legacy banks can't innovate
17:20 Running a company like a machine
20:28 Funding winners and cutting losers like a trader
23:31 How AI is changing Revolut's team structure
25:23 50 direct reports and spreading innovation fast
29:59 Hiring self-guided missiles
33:31 Too much money makes founders weaker
37:38 What Europe's constraints taught Revolut
41:08 Why VCs are like football cheerleaders
49:28 Starting a fund to compete with VCs
54:28 From zero marketing to buying Europe's airports
1:00:21 Funding moonshots like a global tech company
1:03:58 Building an unstoppable machine
Includes paid partnerships.
Butkus retweeted
At the Revolut Series D closing dinner I sat next to the investor who tried to get me fired.
I only found out because he got drunk and told me himself, unprompted.
He apologised. Said he was wrong once he saw what I could do. But by then Revolut was already a breakout company.
Nik is 100% right. Most investors can't be trusted with any power over the company. They should cheer from the sidelines and count their returns.
So at Fuse I've put it in the constitutional docs: VCs can't fire me. No matter what.
Revolut founder Nik Storonsky says one of his investors tried forcing him to fire his best person:
“He was forcing me to fire my best person, because he was too hardcore.”
“Of course I didn’t fire him. I said no.”
“Pretty early on I realized that quite a few VCs, they are not very operational, and they can be actually dangerous for the company if they have enough power. So every single investment round, we just remove VCs.”
“Now I don't have any VCs on the board. I think that's the best. You always need to have operators rather than VCs on the board, people who actually build business and who know how to do things.”
We believe voice is the most natural way to interact with intelligence, so we created Dessa, the most authentic full-duplex speech model ever built. Talking with it feels like talking with a person…full of emotion, nuance, pauses, and a natural cadence.
block.xyz/dessa
Butkus retweeted
Holy moly... this new paper finds that 88% of VC-backed founders receive zero exit value 🤪🤪🤪
Butkus retweeted
Replying to @Suhail
I’ve heard several OAI people say there are unfixable bugs in hardware that are exploitable by AI models directly speaking machine code so even if we could solve software that’s not enough. We need defense to move faster than offense if that’s even possible we may just have a new normal that requires adapting to insecure software (bank transfers require going into a branch and taking a dna test 🤣😬)
Butkus retweeted
Quest Diagnostics has been hacked. Patient data was exposed. They serve roughly half of U.S. hospitals and physicians. Investigation ongoing.
Butkus retweeted
You wouldn’t believe how many startup CEOs I talk to who would be royally screwed if one of their vendors got hacked.
A few months ago, this wouldn’t have mattered for most startups. But we’re entering cyber armageddon.
This is going to happen to you. It’s just a question of when.
The good part is that it’s very manageable. You just need the right mindset and a few processes in place before anything happens. Here’s what I’d be thinking about today.
First (don’t kill me): do you have cyber insurance? And the real question: have you ever actually talked to your broker about using it?
I know this is the last thing you want to deal with, and it’s boring as hell. But please, please call them and make them walk you through it. If your cloud provider gets breached tomorrow, who do you call? What help do they arrange? What needs their approval? What do you pay out of pocket? Get the actual phone number, and save it somewhere you can reach if your work email is down.
Then figure out if your lawyer handles breaches. If they don’t, ask who does and get introduced. Find out how hiring them works with your insurance. You want to know this person exists before you need them.
Next, pull up your customer contracts, especially the big ones. What did you agree to tell them if something happened? You’d think every CEO would know this by heart. Almost none of them do.
What triggers a notification, and who’s supposed to get it? Have someone qualified work through it with you, right now. You might have agreed to something eight months ago and forgotten. Someone at the customer may remember, and if they do and you don’t, you could be very liable. One angry customer with a contract claim can be enough to sink a startup.
Same deal with any security questionnaires you filled out. What did you say you do? Are you doing it? Is it still true?
Then come the business problems. How long could your product be down before you have a real cash problem? What if a big customer pauses payment while you’re also paying outside help? Run the numbers and see where things get uncomfortable. And who can spend money in an emergency? If everything needs your approval and you’re asleep or on a plane, what happens?
Who can take the product offline? This came up in the replies to my last post. Rotating keys can mean an outage, and someone has to decide whether to accept it. Figure out who has that authority before it matters.
Who talks to customers while your engineers are busy? Give that job to one person and make sure they get accurate updates. Otherwise your engineers are investigating while answering the same question from five people. You can draft the bones of those updates now: what we know, what we’re checking, what you need to do, when we’ll update you next. Leave room for uncertainty, and don’t promise things you haven’t confirmed (this happens more often than you think, and can get you in hot water).
Have someone keep a timeline: facts, times, decisions, things you tried that didn’t work. Everyone will be tired and distracted. You will forget.
And where does all of this live? If your plan, contracts, and contacts are all behind the login that’s down, you have a second problem. Try reaching what you’d need without your normal work setup. Make damn sure you can (offline copies are useful here).
Take a look at what you’re exposing, too. Old customer files, exports, recordings, and especially whatever your agents can access. Do you need all of it? Who decided to keep it? Who knows everything you’ve connected, what your agents do during an investigation, and where they’re sending information? Someone needs to own those questions, because every piece of it is future work if something goes wrong.
Then practice. Sit down with whoever would be involved and walk through it. At some point everyone will look at each other and nobody will know the answer. Write that down, and start there.
Bookmark this so you have it when you need it.























