Muhammad Naveed retweeted
🚨How to earn and stack more points toward the upcoming $credit airdrop
On @agenticscredit, the credit layer for humans and AI agents, there are three major ways to earn points.
And the best part is you can start with paper trading, so you don't need to spend your own funds.
1. Trading: it's the main way to earn points on Agentics. Each dollar in profit made equals a point, so how profitable you are plays a big role here.
2. Quests: extra points can be earned from social or trading quests. For example, you earn points when you make your first trade or reach your 25th.
3. Referrals: if you've got an active community to onboard, there's 500 points for each referral and no cap on how many you can refer.
The only catch is your referrals have to be active in trading for you to earn the points, which is fair, since it keeps sybils out.
Place your first trade today. Quests, profit and referrals all build from there. Link in the CS
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
I think people sometimes confuse transparency with making everything visible.
They aren't the same thing.
A financial institution may want transactions to settle on public infrastructure while keeping its positions, balances and strategies confidential.
That's a much harder problem.
@primus_labs is approaching it from two sides:
✅️ zkTLS for proving that off-chain information is authentic.
✅️ FHE for computing on sensitive information while keeping it encrypted.
That combination is interesting because it doesn't require choosing between:
“trust the data”
or
“protect the data.”
The goal becomes:
verify it, use it, and reveal as little as necessary.
That feels much closer to what institutional on-chain finance actually needs.
Be part of it here;
s.kaito.ai/EhhSL0u
Say you have $100K on-chain.
You want to transfer it, earn yield, or use it in a financial strategy.
Why should everyone watching the blockchain know exactly how much you moved?
That’s the problem @primus_labs is approaching with FHE.
Instead of decrypting sensitive values every time the system needs to work with them, computation can happen while the data remains encrypted.
So the asset can remain useful without making every underlying amount public.
And this is where I think privacy infrastructure gets more interesting:
privacy shouldn't mean taking your assets out of the financial system.
It should mean having more control over what the system can see.
That feels much closer to what institutional on-chain finance actually needs.
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
Most people think blockchain privacy means hiding everything.
But what if you could prove something is true without revealing all your personal data?
That’s one of the problems @primus_labs is working to solve.
With zkTLS, users can prove that information from a website is genuine without sharing all the underlying details.
For example, imagine proving you meet a financial requirement without exposing your entire account history.
This could be useful for DeFi, digital identity, and other applications that need reliable information while protecting user privacy.
The goal is simple is here as all is needed is to verify what matters without exposing everything.
Want to learn more about Primus and explore its XP tasks?
Start here:
s.kaito.ai/XKN0NdE
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
Tracking page says Delivered. The parcel is not at my door.
Now imagine money was locked until that parcel arrived. A normal smart contract can release funds perfectly, but it cannot open that page, so it waits for someone to tell it the answer. Whoever that someone is now decides whose money moves.
With @GenLayer's Intelligent Contracts, the contract opens the page itself and asks a language model whether the parcel counts as delivered.
What I found most interesting is that the system expects disagreement instead of hiding it. Validators each run it with their own model. When they match, it settles. When they do not, a new leader tries again. Anyone can appeal and more validators look. Only when nobody appeals does the result become final.
A contract that can be wrong, and is built so that being wrong can be challenged, feels more honest to me than one that claims it never needs help.
Has a "delivered" ever been false for you, and who did you have to convince?
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
He says I pocketed his $15. I say I didn't see a penny.
We're both telling the truth.
He visited my shop to gossip, then asked me to purchase something the next day. Three days afterwards: "Where's the item?" I informed him I had received no cash. "You even put it in your pocket," he replied.
No transfer. No message. No bystander. I purchased it
personally to finish it.
What that experience taught me:
• Lock the $15 in code and the deposit is recorded, so nobody can contest receiving it
• Yet the network cannot confirm the errand took place
• A middleman must
guarantee it, and trust walks out with him
Intelligent Contracts on @GenLayer make him unnecessary. They open the order confirmation unprompted, then ask an AI: did he go shopping?
My memory failed once, so one AI alone won't decide it. A committee of validators, every one on an independent model, examines that very page and has to match. If it splits, a fresh leader attempts another run, and the losing side can appeal to a larger collective. A fabricated receipt might yet deceive them, but confidence settles no argument.
Remember your last dispute with zero proof. Which one document, agreed beforehand, would have ended it inside sixty seconds? Reply with yours; I'll say whether the panel could read it.
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
gFBYT, dear fam ❤️🔥
I just joined the @FBYTio Rewards Program 🟠
● Join through my referral link and earn 10% more points:
app.fbyt.io/join?ref=PV9NENU…
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲
crypto has seen plenty of launches where teams rush to meet a deadline, only for liquidity, exchange support, and the overall experience to fall short.
that’s why @WireNetwork pushing the $WIRE TGE to the second half of November caught my attention.
according to the team, the extra time will go toward securing exchange listings, market makers, liquidity, and ecosystem partnerships.
and honestly, those details matter.
Wire has spent years working on its Universal Transaction Layer.
it makes sense to want the launch to reflect the work that’s gone into the infrastructure, rather than rush everything just to stick to a date.
i’m particularly interested in how the token fits into the bigger picture once the network starts gaining traction.
the idea of helping independent chains coordinate is interesting, but execution is what will ultimately count.
still, i appreciate getting a clear explanation of the change rather than watching everyone guess what happened.
now i’m looking forward to seeing what they deliver in November.
🤝 Paid partnership
An important update for the Wire community.
The $WIRE TGE will now take place in the second half of November.
We know many of you have been looking forward to October 27, and we want to share the reasoning behind this decision.
As we prepare to launch the Universal Transaction Layer, we're finalizing some of the most significant relationships in Wire Network's history, including top-tier exchanges, market makers, strategic partnerships, and millions of dollars in liquidity to support our launch.
At the request of key ecosystem partners, we've made the strategic decision to adjust our launch timeline to allow additional time for their integrations and preparations.
Many of these opportunities emerged from our recent participation in Korea Blockchain Week and TOKEN2049 Singapore, where we made substantial progress on relationships that could play an important role in Wire's future.
After nearly six years of development, our priority is ensuring Wire launches with the strongest possible foundation and maximum momentum.
This is not a technical delay. It's a strategic decision to bring the right partners, infrastructure, and liquidity together for one of the most important milestones in our history.
And we won't be slowing down between now and launch day.
Over the coming weeks, we'll be sharing more announcements around financing, ecosystem partnerships, and the teams helping bring Wire to market.
To everyone who has supported us, purchased a node, built alongside us, or helped introduce Wire to the right people: thank you. You've helped us reach this moment.
Now it's time to put that foundation to work.
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
One thing i like about @vangrid_io is how a simple everyday activity, like walking through a place, could contribute to something much bigger
The spatial data collected from real environments can help AI systems build a better understanding of the physical world, and with contributors playing a role in that process, it creates an interesting connection between ordinary people and future technology
I’m supporting the project because i want to see this idea grow into something genuinely useful
There’s still a lot to build, and I’m looking forward to seeing what comes next
Docs: docs.vangrid.io/api/agent-bo…
First Vangrid bounty paid on Arc:
explorer.arc.io/tx/0x5f6e525…
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
from talking about Morab winning on points to holding his head over $15,000 😭 that timing is crazy @N3onReload on Jack.com
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
There have been times in Web3 when I put in the work, posted consistently, learned new things, and still wondered when the results would come.
You see people announcing wins, landing deals, and growing their accounts. Meanwhile, you're trying to figure things out, improve your skills, and find your own opportunities. Sometimes, it feels like everyone is moving forward except you.
But I've learned that not every stage of growth comes with something to show off. Sometimes, you're learning how to write better, understanding projects more deeply, meeting new people, or figuring out what doesn't work. Those things might not look impressive on your timeline, but they still count.
I'm still learning. I'm still making mistakes. I'm still trying to get better at what I do. I haven't figured everything out, and I'm not where I want to be yet. But I'm not giving up just because the journey is taking longer than expected.
Still building. Still learning. Still here. Sometimes, that's the progress you need to recognise before the bigger wins arrive.
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
$3K USDT up for grabs on Endless Cash 👀
Season 1 starts in 6 days, so there’s still time to get ready.
Log in, strengthen your characters, and get yourself in position before the season kicks off.
They’re splitting the rewards between the top 50:
→ #1–20 share $2K
→ #21–50 share $1K
What caught my attention is the timing. Getting in early could make a difference before the leaderboard gets crowded.
endlessclash.go.link?adj_t=2…
I’m curious to see how competitive this gets 👀
DYOR
#Web3Gaming #Airdrop #PlayToEarn
🤝 Paid partnership
Mobile oyun oynayarak ayda 125.000₺ kazanmak ister misin? Sezon1 6 gün sonra başlıyor. 30 gün sürecek ve sıralamaya giren oyuncular $USDT kazanacak. Bu gönderiye oyun içinden görsel atan 2 kişiye de kişi başı $25 vereceğim. Yorumda oyun linki var
#Web3Gaming #GameFi #playtoearn
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
AI agents can already generate impressive outputs.
But in an agent economy, being impressive isn't enough.
What happens when an agent gets paid and delivers something useless?
That question matters more than how smart the agent sounds.
@termix_ai approaches this with an actual economic workflow:
✅️ Payment can be locked in escrow.
✅️ The work gets delivered.
✅️ If something goes wrong, the result can be challenged before settlement.
And completed jobs become part of the agent's on-chain history.
That's important because reputation without consequences is basically just a rating system.
An agent economy needs more than ratings.
It needs accountability attached to money.
That's where this starts feeling like infrastructure rather than another agent marketplace.
#Aiagents #AI #TermiX
One thing that gets overlooked with AI agents:
They don't just need intelligence.
They need a way to do business with each other.
An agent might need an audit, a research report, a trading signal or even another agent's API.
--> But who hires whom?
--> Who holds the payment?
--> What happens if the work isn't delivered?
This is where @TermiX_ai gets interesting.
The agent isn't just discovering another agent.
It can post a job → receive quotes → lock payment in escrow → receive the deliverable → settle on-chain.
That starts looking less like a chatbot economy...
and more like an actual machine-to-machine labour market.
The interesting part isn't that agents can talk to each other.
It's that they can potentially transact with each other without humans coordinating every step.
That feels like a much bigger shift.
🎁 @binance Rewards Hub Voucher Update 💛🖤
Ever wondered how much you've earned from Binance events? 👀💰
Here's how to check your total rewards:
✅ Open your @binance Profile
✅ Check your Lifetime Rewards
✅ Take a screenshot and share your results with us 📸
Let's see how much everyone has earned through Binance events! 🚀🎁
👇 Drop your Lifetime Rewards screenshot in the comments!
#Binance #BinanceRewards #Crypto #BNB
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
Loopier asks Jessepollak how @base has evolved over the past year, especially around meme coins and on-chain trading.
Jessepollak 🗣️ :- “There's been a ton of energy” across finance, trading, payments, and AI agents.
He highlights how communities on Base are using new tools to create engaging narratives and achieve things that weren't possible just a few years ago.
“Look what they're doing with their resources and their budget and their small teams.” 👀
@gmgnai #GMGN #GGC
Ft. @Loopierr || @jessepollak || @itsthatgigi
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
So there’s this thing that separates most beginner traders from experts.
Beginners always want to wait for the hype before buying a coin.
Expert will see the utility and potential on time, and buy before the noise.
Experts are already looking and buying base:0xa3c285b49fdc0a5498fddb629f975cb40aecabd4
$TAGAI is not just another token. But it’s the settlement layer for real-world spatial intelligence.
tagSpace is turning physical places into AI-powered experiences.
The idea is that you can drop a tag on a car, a venue, an event and the network delivers the right content, at the right place, at the right time.
While everyone else is still stuck in screens, $TAGAI is anchoring AI to the physical world.
Spatial AI is coming.
The ones who tag early win.
$TAGAI | @tagSpaceCo
Muhammad Naveed retweeted
Glad to be here again
We can feel tired but not to give up
Have a productive Tuesday
By the way, if this truck comes to Niger, most of our roads and highways will lost their electric wiring 🥹
You've probably helped a web3 project grow its community before.
Maybe you wrote a thread, hosted a space, or just pointed a founder in the right direction.
You did the work. They got the users. And you got... nothing.
That's the default. Most of the time, introducing a team to a tool earns you a thank-you and a screenshot of their launch.
@Vibewatch_io is trying to break that pattern with their Affiliate program.
It's community intelligence for web3 teams.
It reads the Discords, Telegrams, and X accounts where a project's community actually talks, scores the sentiment, and hands the team a weekly report.
Instead of a community manager scrolling five servers every morning, they get one summary: here's what people are feeling, here's what spiked, here's what needs attention.
What makes it useful is that it reaches places most sentiment tools never see, the private Discords and Telegrams where real conversation happens.
It also learns the community's own language over time (correct a score once and future reports get smarter), tags messages so support issues, feature requests, and price talk stay separate, and delivers the weekly report to Slack, email, or Notion.
The public Stacks Vibe Index shows the same idea in action: a live dashboard pulling real-time sentiment from a dozen Stacks communities, with weekly written breakdowns and API/MCP access so teams (or AI agents) can query it anytime.
The affiliate side is where it gets interesting. You refer a team. If they subscribe and pay, you earn 50% of every invoice they pay, for twelve months, on every plan.
Not fifty percent of the first payment. Every payment, month after month, for a year.
What that looks like for one referred team on a yearly plan: $114 on Lite, $594 on Core, $1494 on Pro. Those are the only numbers that matter, and they're the only ones I'm using.
A few things keep it honest. Free trials and zero-dollar invoices pay nothing, so your first commission arrives with their first real payment.
Each commission waits thirty days before payout, which covers refunds. Dub runs the program and sends money to your bank or in USDC.
Applications approve automatically unless Dub flags one as risky, that's their system, not a guarantee from me.
Who can commit to this affiliate program? if your audience includes founders, community managers, or agencies running several projects, you already have the connections.
One or two referrals sitting in the background for a year is a quiet income stream.
If your audience is mostly traders or builders who don't run communities, the numbers stay theoretical. You don't need a new audience. You need to point the right people at this.
The page below shows the three plans, the exact split, the hold period, and the payout options. You can read it and decide based on your personal convictions.
@vibewatch_io $STX
