Call Me That

most of these companies don't even care about your privacy or data at all. this is what it is. on the other, most of these crypto websites or platforms don't even let users to delete their acc data at all in the account section. cc @Galxe @frontrunpro just add the delete account button in that settings, I don't use any of ur platform from last few months, therefore i don't want keep my data in ur companies db at all.

a lot of u asked for the full windows setup under my last tweet so here it is : ct-opsec-guide.vercel.app do whatever u want with it, hope it keeps u safe from hacks. gl

u will scroll 500+ tweets today but won’t read 10 pages of whitepaper that's why i am turning the NEAR investment thesis into an X timeline building this one for @NEARProtocol hackathon, btw what r u all cooking for this hackathon?

i have like $69 in crypto and still make my AI agent scan my whole PC every morning. on the other hand, the biggest CEX Binance lost $3B+ cuz one engineer's laptop got hacked. skill issue tbh.

i think we should be wary of those claiming their project is 100% quantum resistant now. if we were to research and compare the facts of the matter, by oct 2026 : QRL uses hash-based signatures from 2018, near and algorand also have optional pq signing ready to use. having pq signatures is only 1/2 of the story however, the other part is how flexible that blockchain is when it comes to changing its cryptographic algo. @starknet is a good example of that other aspect. its starkproof technology utilizes hashes, not elliptic curves for proofs. and since every starknet account is programmable there is room for implementing a different signing mechanism without any network upgrade. and even with all of that, they are still not 100% done. so when a project says it is already fully quantum safe, i get skeptical, cuz those are usually the ones with the least to show when you look into it. and being honest, I would rather trust a project that says "we are working on it" than "we are already safe"

i kinda disagree with serpin here, and i feel like reputation on ct is overrated. i have seen many solid researchers post genuinely useful stuff and get 50 or less likes, while some random account with 100k - 200k followers posts a one liner and the whole CT is talking about it. crypto projects know this too, and that is why paid ads go to whoever has reach and influence, not whoever has the best reputation. influence > reputation, at least on ct. it sucks but that is the reality.

Antidrain Wallet Extension now has a new look with updated features, such as : 1. Rescue NFTs (ERC-721 + ERC-1155) with zero service fee, up to 50 NFTs in a single transaction. 2. Support for contract interactions. Some processes require interacting with contract first. For example, some unstaking requires u to send a transaction to start the process, and then a cooldown period begins. With the AntiDrain extension, u can now handle these actions too. 3. Auto-discovery of ERC-20 tokens and NFTs that are still stuck in your compromised wallet. If you have a compromised wallet with assets or unclaimed airdrops stuck in it, give Antidrain wallet extension a try : chromewebstore.google.com/de…

this is what happens when airdrop farmers end up as founders and team members of projects like @ritualnet this space is so cooked that 99.9% of web3 projects don’t even try to live off revenue, cuz their product has no real use cases at all. their playbook is simple : give the team a fat chunk of the tokenomics, wait for the unlock and dump on retail. no product, no revenue, only exit liquidity. that is a big reason why VCs stopped investing in crypto and pivoted to AI.