MAGA!!!

President Donald J. Trump "I will totally obliterate the Deep State." The crowd cheers

In the newly dropped “bombshell evidence” this morning by Baker and associates about the Cole case, the actual question that would matter was still not addressed. Let me remind you all the actual question, since it’s hard to figure out after being told about everything but that. Is the person in the hoodie in that video Cole or not? That was never answered. Let’s pretend every word of what they said this morning was true. The figure was carrying a gun, okay but prove it wasn’t Cole. Baker says himself that Cole owned two handguns and boxes of 9mm and .45 ammunition [58:05]. A gun on the bomber is just as consistent with Cole as with a cop. If anything, it fits him more. No mention again of the purchases, his phone's location, his car on the plate reader, the components found at his home, or the confession. No clarification about their own alibi video, the north-side clip with the unverified clocks. What it does do: •It keeps the "it was a cop" story alive. That story matters to Baker personally. He's being sued for naming a former Capitol Police officer, and a "the bomber was police" narrative is his public defense. •It changes the subject. Instead of "was it Cole?" the audience is now arguing about holsters, hand mics and fabric lines, the same way on Secret America Baker got them arguing about sandwiches and bushes. •It creates new FBI "failures." "Why didn't they seize his guns?" and "why didn't they evacuate the neighbors?" turn into evidence of a cover-up, even though the FBI never claimed the bomber had a gun. They're faulting the FBI for not acting on their theory which feeds their content schedule. The teaser, the reveal, the sponsor read, the $5 subscription plug. Even if the bomber was carrying a gun, Baker says Cole owned guns, so this doesn't exclude Cole. It doesn't address the phone, the purchases, the car or the confession, and it doesn't even mention their own alibi video from four days ago. Why do this? So people can’t even remember the actual question in the case anymore.

Why do all the same people try to game community notes? Rhetorical question. His grandmother told the NY Post "autistic-like"one relative, said that he was "almost autistic-like because he doesn't understand a lot of stuff." One comment from a family member isn't a diagnosis, not to mention, she did not specifically say he has autism, not to mention he was 30 years old and had never been diagnosed up until December 30. Within hours Seraphin and others dropped the "almost" and the "like" and were calling him "autistic" as a settled fact. Cole’s father declined to comment, and AP said calls to other relatives went unreturned. Then, according to the DOJ's own Oct 16 motion, the actual diagnosis came "for the first time in the defendant's life, six weeks after his arrest," his school records show "no medical diagnoses… no developmental deficits," and the defense has "refused to disclose any information supporting" it. One of the cough comment that he is autistic like because he doesn’t understand a lot of stuff does not make it a categorical claim that he is autistic before the actual medical diagnosis comes in. At the time this comment was made he was fully employed, or registered gun owner, and a valid drivers license holder. 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️