jabber 🦎 retweeted
+60k on r***tober, probably my most unlocked month. couple of rt + couple of mindless blasts. GONNA RUN IT BACK ON NOVEMBER
jabber 🦎 retweeted
the market hasn’t printed a 10m runner in a month.
so how is this guy up 140k in a week?
is this just edge or are we all getting farmed?
9 hours, -2k. Will do better tomorrow. I need to chill, oversizing too much. Tomorrow will be an up day.
#trenching #memecoin #kimchi #adobo
+16k uptember
Lowkey didn’t lock in too much but still grateful and blessed. Gonna go hard this Uptober — 6 figs PnL incoming or gay.
jabber 🦎 retweeted
+314,724
+ 29k on fomo
+343K in uptember
lowkey fell off this month, learned a lot of lessons, haven’t been locked in much. feels like i’ve lost my hunger. gonna grind harder next month
LOOKING FORWARD TO UPTOBER
trade with bb : t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_b…
A quick thesis on why @usesquareapp stands out.
( 0x2e3496a9894d9120cc901e51cf74bae257077777 )
Most "fees go to creators" projects right now don't hold up. The mechanism is a line in a bio, and the deployer keeps control meaning they can redirect those fees the moment the token gains traction. It's a promise, not a guarantee.
Square is built differently. At launch, the token's fee beneficiary is set to Square's treasury permanently. Only the current beneficiary can reassign it, so once it's locked, the deployer cannot claw it back.
From there, fees accrue on-chain and are credited to a creator's handle inside a public escrow. The creator claims to any wallet they choose. Square signs the authorization, but the signature names the recipient's wallet it cannot be redirected. The creator receives 100%, Square takes no cut.
What I find most compelling is that the creator does nothing in advance. No account, no connected wallet, no prior awareness required. The funds are simply held until they come to claim them. And every credit and claim is a public transaction anyone can verify independently.
That is the line between actual infrastructure. Send it.
