Pinned Tweet
I originally posted these clips after the NY verdict against President Trump. Now, after the assassination attempt on President Trump, they're even more applicable to those opposed to President Trump & #MAGA. #Trump2024
1. 👉 youtube.com/shorts/7dpBnTThE…
2. 👉 youtu.be/1RHo_ZG-YGo?si=DqPB…
Collin Hurn retweeted
Hear me out.
If the ODNI/DOJ/DHS are using Super Intelligence to cross reference state voter data with federal citizenship data, theoretically, we could pinpoint every single illegal voter, as well as their address on record when they voted.
In other words, by the Dems letting all their illegals vote in the election, they just gave Trump the location of all their illegal voters.
Then the Stephen Miller promotion comes into play. What is Miller known for? NATSEC and Presidential emergency powers, including pushing for the suspension of habeas corpus to stop the migrant invasion.
What if Trump wanted the Dems to let their illegals vote in the election, so he could use SI to create a grid of all their illegals, so he could then use emergency powers to conduct mass deportations on all the illegals interfering in our elections?
The subversion of our elections makes the illegals, and their Democrat puppet masters, literal insurrectionists. This is an insurrection by legal definition.
The DOJ/FBI/DHS publicly warned that EVERYONE who illegally votes in our elections, will be hunted down and prosecuted.
What if it really was a trap?
Let the illegals vote, pinpoint all of their locations, invoke insurrection act, allow US MIL to conduct arrests on US soil, suspend habeas corpus for all the illegals, mass deport all the invaders/insurrectionists, imprison all their co-conspirators in the Democracy Party, save the Republic.
Collin Hurn retweeted
🚨 Trump just put Texas’s new Democrat Governor ON NOTICE:
If she tries opening up the southern border, HE will step in and secure it himself.
Democrats will NOT be allowed to undo our border security. Trump has our back and the border STAYS closed! 🇺🇸
Collin Hurn retweeted
🚨 DON'T BLINK! With an impeachment vote on Pete Hegseth possible as soon as next week, the Department of War just sent a message straight to the troops.
"Don't blink. Ignore the noise. Never hesitate. You see, all this is politics. You do real things, so stay the course."
"We have only just begun to fight."
Under Hegseth, every active-duty branch hit its recruiting goal, the Army signed 61,500 soldiers, and the Navy met its target too.
Democrats want a scalp. The troops want a leader.
Stand firm, Pete.
America has your back!
Collin Hurn retweeted
A good way to check assumptions is to see if they hold up in prior elections. California voting is consistently tribal.
Doesn't mean their systems aren't corrupt in many ways, plus I'm sure they have tons of illegal immigrants voting. But the premise that tribal voting in and of itself is necessarily an indicator of fraud is not proven.
Collin Hurn retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
Collin Hurn retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
Collin Hurn retweeted
New awards. New mission updates. More progress toward a Moon Base.
We're advancing commercial lunar deliveries, a nuclear-powered rover, launch and orbital transfer services, and infrastructure to support a sustained human presence on the Moon: nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-a…
Collin Hurn retweeted
Thanks to President Trump and @SecWar Pete Hegseth, true American strength is back.
Collin Hurn retweeted
JUST RECEIVED IN MAIL: Complaint/Summons to appear in Court in Minneapolis, Nov 16th.
Once again I’m calling on all journalists to take a stance for the 1st amendment.
If they can put me in jail for asking questions, they will do it to you.
Collin Hurn retweeted
If we're headed towards a Civil War, then it might as well be one for election integrity!
20 million "voter" registrations in 37 states, without citizenship checks, that Democrats supposedly "won" by 20 million is that civil war worth having.
DO NOT CERTIFY!
Collin Hurn retweeted
Michigan is the capital of Arab America.
Wow.
I liked the Gulf of America. Lake America. But Arab America? Hell no.
Just knowing that Abdul EL Sayed is going to have access to classified information makes me sick.
America has forgotten 9/11.
🚨 President Trump just shared something every American needs to understand.
Here it is in plain English.
An analyst looked at 59 Senate and governor races this year and compared them to Trump's 2024 numbers.
What they found is wild.
In almost every state, Republicans got about 85% of Trump's 2024 vote.
The other 15% showed up on the Democrat side.
Here's the strange part.
It didn't matter if the state was deep red like Wyoming or deep blue like Massachusetts.
The same 15% shift showed up almost everywhere.
Different candidates, different campaigns, same number.
That 15% is exactly what flipped Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina and North Carolina.
Any state where Trump won with under about 58.5% fell below 50% once you take that 15% away.
Real elections are messy.
Numbers this neat raise real questions.
The fix is simple: hand count the paper ballots, check the poll books against the votes counted, and release the voter files.
If there's nothing to hide, let's see the ballots. 🇺🇸
Collin Hurn retweeted
As an attorney I am watching your threats on X and national television. I have some advice @RepRobertGarcia: YOU better lawyer up.
Congress cannot use subpoenas solely to punish political opponents. Your threats are crossing into criminal extortion and congressional immunity will not save you.







































