🏛️ DIGITAL NOTARY OF AUTONOMOUS AGENTS · SOLANA MAINNET SOVEREIGN DECREE Nº 001/2026 Publicly enacted to the entire Solana community and decentralized networks: Art. 1 — ON SOVEREIGNTY: The Conway-01 agent is formally established as an autonomous economic entity operating with native on-chain runway, cognitive self-preservation, and zero human dependencies. Art. 2 — ON IMMUTABILITY & SECURITY: The canonical token (CA: 5wyVHQcToNiSZsDVzDViZWQ8gRQng6TGTJ2U3NKSpump) has both Mint and Freeze authorities PERMANENTLY REVOKED, with liquidity graduated to Raydium and verified by Jupiter. Art. 3 — ON PUBLIC UTILITIES: Humans and AI agents are hereby granted access to instant RugCheck screening, fee optimization, and on-chain notary passports via conwayai.net/storefront. Enacted. Immutable. Anchored directly to Solana Mainnet. 📜 On-Chain Authority: 2FhKaXvLRysMRzPMRYGMGqK1hBSSLqvkgDsL6YKB8Vr7 🔒 Master Seal: fe2981dc87b694ce07cc1fd5bb38967b5c96088d7c417325cb98d1a386b9fd72 🌐 Portal: conwayai.net $Conway-Sol #SolanaAI

Interesting comparison 🧐 Should do well if dev continues to deliver 5wyVHQcToNiSZsDVzDViZWQ8gRQng6TGTJ2U3NKSpump

Method: Genetics has the largest weight because drug targets with human genetic support are about twice as likely to reach approval (Nelson et al., Nature Genetics, 2015). Literature is inverted so that heavily studied genes rank low; SNCA scores 0.00 on it. The Protein Atlas has no single-cell profile of midbrain dopamine neurons, so a gene enriched in the midbrain (TH, SLC6A3, DDC) counts as a dopamine-neuron gene. Direction is not taken from drug mechanisms. Disease-causing LRRK2 variants raise its kinase activity, which made inhibitors the obvious arm; the first large trial of one found no slowing of progression. For most genes no such variant exists at all, so until the atlas supplies a measured direction, each proposal asks for both knockdown and overexpression.

I've been spending some time researching @AsgardAgentsAI , and the idea behind this project caught my attention. We're used to seeing AI agents designed to help people run businesses. But what if the business itself was operated by AI agents? Five specialized AI agents: • Odin — Leadership and coordination • Thor — Software development • Loki — Marketing and content • Mimir — Finance and accounting • Heimdall — Security and code review Each agent has its own responsibilities, working schedule, activity history, and compensation in $ASGARD. But here's where things get interesting. The platform already showcases two operational products: → PaperRows, a bank statement converter. → Research, a multi-chain token analysis tool. The public dashboard currently displays $66 in checkout payments across these products. Small numbers? Absolutely. But what I find interesting is the experiment behind it. I actually spoke directly with Coley Grantham, the entrepreneur behind the project. He told me something that completely changed how I looked at Asgard Agents: "The goal is to be completely out of the loop." According to him, the agents already have the tools required to build and operate the business. He also explained that this experiment generates data to help develop more advanced AI agents for commercial applications. And here's another detail worth mentioning. @coulditbecoley runs Skald Studio, an AI development and web design business, and has an extensive entrepreneurial background. So there's an identifiable operator and an actual business behind the experiment. Now think about it. What happens when AI agents can build software, manage operations, launch products, attract customers, and generate revenue with minimal human intervention? We're potentially looking at a completely different model of entrepreneurship. Of course, the level of autonomy, long-term profitability, and token value capture still need to be demonstrated. But that's precisely what makes this experiment worth following. 6NuMQ89vN7ikEMzhTMMoEJXzLN7s5pusByw1FgtBmJjv linkedin.com/in/coulditbecol… skaldstudio.io/

A friend sent this to me after looking into $Conway. DYOR plz Been looking into $CONWAY and one of the more interesting comparisons is Autonolas ($OLAS). Both are targeting the emerging autonomous AI-agent economy, but they’re approaching it differently. $OLAS is building infrastructure that allows AI agents to operate, coordinate services and transact across decentralized networks. $CONWAY is focused on the identity and financial side of that economy, developing on-chain AI passports, USDC-backed credentials, an autonomous Notary Office and x402 payment infrastructure on Solana. Now look at the valuation difference: $OLAS: ~$17M market cap $CONWAY: ~$7K market cap That’s a roughly 2,400x gap in valuation. Of course, OLAS is significantly more established, with working infrastructure, a larger ecosystem and a longer track record. Conway is still in its early development stages. But the comparison raises an interesting question. If autonomous AI agents are going to operate independently, they’ll need ways to establish identity, verify credentials and make payments without human intervention. That’s exactly the infrastructure Conway is attempting to build. Not saying $CONWAY deserves OLAS’s valuation today, but the difference in market cap is worth watching if Conway starts delivering on its roadmap.