
A lyrical nomad in ₿itcoin space. | https://nitter.gq/t.co/nNV8e2oSNx | #npub1dxu6lr6yyzt3dtaplknmk96kn8p9g7c7jdklqjcft7rgnxyk700qt0vdqv
Joined April 2021
- Tweets25.4K
- Following6.7K
- Followers3.7K
- Likes54K
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
Motorola has announced their new high end flagship phone including upcoming official support for GrapheneOS as an OS option.
Motorola Signature 27 will be the first Motorola device supported by GrapheneOS. More devices will be supported in the future.
motorolanews.com/motorola-si…
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
What does a blue wave mean for bitcoin?
Two years ago, the Trump administration came into office promising to make America the crypto capital of the planet. Yesterday, Americans voted, as they seem to enjoy doing, for change. What does a blue wave say about President Trump's promise and America's take on bitcoin?
1. Affordability was on the ballot.
Affordability defined the election. In one NBC exit poll, 89% of voters called the cost of living a “crucial or major factor in their vote”. In the last Harvard CAPS/Harris survey before the vote, price increases led every other issue.
Prices are in part a question of monetary design — do we inflate away or not? And that's where bitcoin comes in. Bitcoin is a money whose supply no one can inflate at will. It's capped, and new supply is governed by rules, not rulers. A fixed supply does not lower grocery prices. But it does offer savers of any political orientation a unit that no administration can debase.
2. Crypto money did not decide the outcome.
The crypto industry spent about $200 million this cycle. Its largest super PAC network alone spent more than $170 million: about $75 million backing Republicans and $36 million opposing Democrats, against $30 million backing Democrats. Most of that money went to competitive races its candidates lost, Ohio’s Senate seat chief among them.
3. A wide swath of Americans hold bitcoin.
The Nakamoto Project’s national surveys find that bitcoin owners belong to no political tribe. In 2024, ownership was highest among the very liberal (21.9%), then the very conservative (17.6%), then moderates (14.3%); only age and gender strongly predicted it. In 2025, owners still clustered at the ideological center.
Since so many Americans hold bitcoin, across the ideological spectrum, lawmakers still have reason to enact policies that do not threaten their ability to save in bitcoin or spend it.
4. The debanking argument for bitcoin remains strong, and non-partisan.
Debanking is the exclusion of law-abiding enterprises or individuals from financial services because they are politically disfavored or otherwise distasteful. Senator Elizabeth Warren thinks that debanking is a problem. So does President Trump.
And there is, surprise surprise, a bitcoin connection here as well. Because bitcoin is money no one can block you from using, it serves as a useful backup for anyone at risk of being debanked, and an alternative to traditional financial institutions.
5. Trust is low; alternatives are enticing.
Americans have never trusted institutions less. And arguably, those institutions — from higher education to Washington — have failed to earn trust. Though it rotates in degree as parties swap places on the Hill, this erosion in trust remains a broad trend.
Bitcoin, mercifully, was not on the ballot. In a way, it can't be. Because bitcoin is money that lies outside institutions. You can hold it yourself. You can spend it without anyone's permission. For that reason, it remains an enticing alternative for Americans looking for change.
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
Four years ago today, I sat down for a long chat with @PeterMcCormack. A curious little treasure, the thing that resulted.
youtube.com/watch?v=JTDfgphx…
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
Replying to @pete_rizzo_
Buying bitcoin in a banking app is easy. Moving it out to a wallet the bank doesn't control is the part that actually matters.
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
Manifest Destiny, Man
A tribute to @americanhodl8 (lyrics from my Hermes agent reading transcripts of his interviews & talks.)
Astra + Opus 5.5 + Hermes + Suno + Higgsfield + Tesseract for editing + local model voice stack to make the singer have HODL's vocal characteristics.
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
I have an essay this morning in @campusreform about AI and higher education.
Universities face multiple problems all at once--- politicization, affordability, the demographic cliff, and AI.
No one wants to be the one to pull the plug on an institution. But the ones on life support will draw resources away from schools with better chances, and pull them down, too. This is also happening within institutions --- the politicized departments weighing down everyone else should probably just be thrown overboard.
But if we just focus on AI, what can be done?
(1) adopt a barbell strategy with more human-centered instruction and assessment and more AI use to automate routine tasks, including grading. And it's not hypocritical to require undergraduate students to do their own work while graders rely on AI, especially for lower-level classes. There are a number of asymmetries between faculty and students which justify AI use in grading.
(2) adopt an organizational brain -- dump all your handbooks and rules and institutional knowledge into local/private computers and automate as much as possible while rooting out unnecessary expenses, duplicate licenses, and so on. Everyone complains about administrative bloat. Well, now the technology exists to automate the bloat away.
A lot of schools are too risk averse to experiment. But lots of apparent risk-aversion is just cowardice --- someone would rather stick with the status quo, and take the 5% chance of things magically turning around than make a courageous decision that gives a +20% chance of success. They would really rather go down with the ship, with everyone, than make a courageous decision and have people yell at them.
And that kind of cowardice, which is widespread within higher ed, explains why so many places are going to be in a world of hurt, not just with AI, but with the other problems, too.
campusreform.org/article/opi…
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
Replying to @jesseposner
@jesseposner and I really excited to finally be sharing our hardware product that we have been developing for more than a year @voravault
Thank you so much to @PresidioBitcoin for their support!
Introducing Vora Aegis: The World’s Most Loyal AI
@Erikcason, @jesseposner, and Nick George unveil the Vora Aegis hardware for the first time, showcase its software, and share their vision for personal, private, open-source AI
(0:00) - A civilizational view of AI
(4:56) - Introducing Vora Aegis
(5:49) - MeDB: a private database for personal data
(7:22) - Unveiling Vora Aegis
More on Vora Aegis: vora.io
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
We should onion-route the entire Internet.
We can incentivize people to run onion nodes by integrating layer 2 bitcoin payments and packet routing.
Yes, this would turn the public Internet into the Dark Web.
Yes, this would be a good thing. Don't you know what's coming?
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
This is what “permissionless” actually means. Thank you, @RoyaMahboob.
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
The cypherpunks didn't spend decades building cryptography so you could upload a selfie holding your passport to buy $50 of crypto.
Somewhere along the way we seriously lost the f*cking plot.
Make crypto cypherpunk again...
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
Hey @grok, explain in detail why the Clarity Act not passing is actually the best outcome for Bitcoiners.
Cosmo Crixter 🟠 retweeted
Important information on one of the two legal battles led by BULLBITCOIN.COM in its fight against DAC8 and the mass surveillance of cryptoasset users.
You all know that BULLBITCOIN.COM initiated a legal challenge against the Council of State in February 2026 to contest the application of DAC8 in France. This announcement was made in June 2026 at the BTCPrague conference, and the details of the challenge are available on DAC8.COM
What you didn't know is that we had also initiated a second challenge in August 2026. This challenge requested the immediate suspension of the decree implementing DAC8 in France.
It is important to understand that this challenge, a summary suspension proceeding, is different from the first challenge contesting the very legality of the decree.
It was about requesting the emergency suspension of the DAC8 decree in question pending a ruling on the merits, on the grounds that its application could cause irreparable harm. We clearly and unequivocally demonstrated that the implementation of DAC8 in France would pose a real and imminent danger to the security of crypto holders and their loved ones, and that there therefore exists a situation of urgency and serious harm justifying the immediate suspension of the decree.
The concentration of data, including the physical addresses and the amount of crypto transaction data of users, in a database shared with all the tax authorities of the EU member states, represents a significant risk of leakage with disastrous consequences such as their exploitation by criminals to kidnap, mutilate, and extort holders or their loved ones.
We regret to announce to you today that this summary suspension proceeding has been rejected by the Council of State.
However, this refusal in no way means that the Council of State rejects our substantive arguments, and concerns only the grounds of urgency. Moreover, the absence of comment on the substantive arguments leads us to presume that the Council of State considers our approach to be well-founded.
Our legal proceedings for the complete annulment of the DAC8 decree is still ongoing, and we are very confident of winning it.
Nevertheless, we are dismayed by the Council of State's response, which can be summed up as follows:
“The applicant companies [Bull Bitcoin and Paymium] also fail to establish how the storage of this data within a register centralizing all transaction data of all residents of EU member states would be likely to heighten the risk that it be compromised, especially since, in any event, the mere possibility of a risk, the probability of which is very low, cannot constitute a situation of urgency."
Yet, the DGFIP (French tax authorities) itself declared, in February 2026, during parliamentary discussions on the creation of a crypto-asset portfolio declaration, that “a generalized declaration of these [crypto-asset] portfolios would lead to the centralization of highly sensitive data, such as the identity of holders and the value of their assets” and that “in a context of frequent cyberattacks against large databases, this information would become a prime target for hackers, with risks of fraud.”
Our demonstration of urgency is supported by the facts, by French and international expertise, and by common sense. Violent crimes targeting crypto holders and their loved ones, as well as data leaks held by government institutions that make them possible in the first place, are becoming increasingly serious and frequent. You only need to read the news in France to reach the same conclusion.
In the coming days, we will publish the details of our summary proceeding, including supporting documents and arguments, so that you can judge for yourself the merits and factual basis of our demonstration.
We are waging this war against mass surveillance on multiple fronts and in multiple countries. We have won battles and suffered setbacks. This minor defeat only strengthens our determination.

























