Calling out double standards, with a side of comedy
Joined September 2023
- Tweets71.1K
- Following463
- Followers644
- Likes66.1K
DaBull Standard retweeted
1st wave feminism: voting rights
2nd wave feminism: sexual liberation, no-fault divorce
3rd wave feminism: end of gender roles
4th wave feminism: #MeToo era, trannies
5th wave feminism: women on steroids raping sensitive young men
Cornell 7 frat member says he was "sodomized" by 'Jane Doe' while incapacitated, asserted that nobody cared that he was a "survivor" of s*xual assault.
Matthew Ingalls torched school officials in an email, accusing them of gender discrimination and entrapment.
"You received information that I was sodomized by her while I was incapacitated back in November, and you never once thought to alert me of my rights under these procedures as a survivor of this assault?" Ingalls said in a letter to Cornell's Title IX investigator in February 2025, according to ABC.
"The very fact that I had to bring this to your attention now in February confirms my worst fears: that this process is rolled [sic] with gender discrimination."
According to separate documents, Ingalls said he was too intoxicated to give consent and claims he fell asleep at one point.
He also claimed, during a phone call with Doe, that she told him that she was completely sober.
DaBull Standard retweeted
Such a clever joke! Real comedic genius on display. I’m sure if people started taking about how it would be great if Jamelle Bouie got lynched, he would have a hearty laugh and slap them on their back. He’s cool like that.
DaBull Standard retweeted
only 4 of 'The Cornell 7' even touched Lucy Craig (Jane Doe)
We knew 3 of the 4 were POC
now, turns out Matthew Ingalls is half-Egyptian
so 4 POC allegedly gang raped a White girl
DaBull Standard retweeted
but lawsuit says Jane Doe started Cornell in 2022
which outweighs other 99% pointing to Lucy Craig /s
DaBull Standard retweeted
Woke narrative: white males from the U.S. are the most evil people in the world, just look at what's going on at the frats!
Reality (as I currently understand it, no guarantees this is 100% correct):
Of the two considered the most guilty and got expelled from Cornell:
Matthew "Umar" Ingalls: an Arabic Muslim from the Middle East.
Johnathan Newell: looks like a black man.
The three who were considered second-order guilty, were only given suspensions, or in the case of Diego Sarabia who already graduated, barred from ever returning to campus:
Winston Lee: Korean from Korea
Gillio Lopes: based on his name, presumably a Brazilian Latino
Diego Sarabia: appears to be a part-black Hispanic
The two considered the least responsible because they entered the room but didn't do anything else warranting harsher punishment than having to study sexual harassment, social media use and bystander intervention, and to write “reflection papers.”
Scott Norris: looks white
Scott Kretzschmar: looks white
But the whitest person involved was Jane Doe herself. With her pale ginger complexion and blue eyes, nobody can look more white than that.
DaBull Standard retweeted
Big, if true (but seems to good to be true)
Matthew Ingalls is the only seemingly-White guy who even touched Jane Doe / Lucy Craig, according to Title IX findings so the real story would be 4 POC raping a White girl - media would not want to cover that
DaBull Standard retweeted
CORNELL ASSAULT CASE: MATTHEW INGALLS APPEARS TO BE UMAR INGALLS OF DUBAI
It appears Umar Ingalls, one of the central figures in the Cornell assault case, has been living under a different name (Matthew) in the United States. His father allegedly teaches Islamic Studies and is the Chair of Middle Eastern Studies at American University in Dubai.
Matthew Ingalls, the Cornell student a Title IX panel found responsible for sexual assault and expelled, appears to be the same person I found pictured in Dubai in 2022 as Umar Ingalls. (attached) Khaleej Times, on October 28, 2022, named him as a Year 13 student at Dubai International Academy Emirates Hills and quoted him on a lunar-rover project he built with four classmates. The photo in that article matches the Cornell defendant. (khaleejtimes.com/uae/dubai-s…)
According to students posting in a Cornell Reddit thread, (attached) he went by Umar, switched to Matthew after moving to the US for college, and spent his junior and senior years at Dubai International Academy.
Students familiar with him have been identifying Professor Matthew Burtchaell Ingalls, Chair of Middle Eastern Studies at American University in Dubai, as his father. The timeline is consistent with that claim, although I have not seen an official public record independently confirming the relationship. (aud.edu/aud-school/school-of…)
Prof. Ingalls joined the AUD faculty in fall 2016. Umar was a Year 13 student there in October 2022, so the professor had already been in Dubai for about six years by the student’s final year of high school, and he is still listed as department chair. Prof. Ingalls’ doctorate is in Islamic studies from Yale, 2011, after a master’s in Arabic studies at the American University in Cairo. He has published on late-medieval Sufism, Islamic law, and Muslim commentary, and has been co-authoring a history of Islam in Egypt. At AUD he teaches Islamic civilizations, Islamic politics, and Islam in its historical and social setting.
According to the complaint, this all starts with Umar (Matthew). Jane Doe went to the Chi Phi house to see him, and investigators say he was the one who asked her to have a threesome and supplied her with more alcohol and drugs. Jonathan Newell, the other participant in that first threesome, told investigators Ingalls invited him in and that he assumed the victim had already agreed. Her complaint alleges Umar gave her more alcohol "Jamaican high proof rum" and coerced her into taking ketamine before and multiple times during the alleged assault, which she says happened while she was incapacitated. ("In her 2024 account to Cornell police, she described becoming progressively more high over the course of the night, reaching what she called nearly a 10 out of 10. “It was the most intoxicated I’ve ever been in my life,” Jane Doe told Cornell police investigators in 2024. “I felt like I was unable to make any decision.”-The Guardian)
(nytimes.com/2026/10/03/nyreg…) (staradvertiser.com/2026/10/0…)
Originally, Ingalls was said to be an employee of DataAnnotation. The company says he's not, he had registered as an independent contractor but was blocked from the platform in May 2024, five months before the alleged assault, and had no access afterward. The company has not said why he was blocked.
According to screenshots reported on of the Chi Phi group chat, Ingalls allegedly twice invited fraternity brothers to come in and “whip it out,” later confirmed that the “shop is still open,” and allegedly shared an image of Jane Doe in a compromising position.
DaBull Standard retweeted
Lucy Craig is Jane Doe and should be named
2022 vs 2023 in suit likely misdirection, attorney will claim was a typo (Sophomore in 2024 consistent throughout)
3 of the 4 'Cornell 7' who were found in Title IX process to actually have sexual contact testified SHE violated consent
DaBull Standard retweeted
Lucy Craig's name should be public
She was accused in Title IX process of violating consent of 2 men
Totally changed her 2024 story in 2026 lawsuit, named her alleged victims, but requested to be called 'Jane Doe'
DaBull Standard retweeted
if Jane Doe was NOT Lucy Craig, she or her attorneys would have denied by now
it's been consensus name for several days and wide open since yesterday
DaBull Standard retweeted
This isn't what happened. You're full of shit as usual, Jared, and you seem to spend an inordinate amount of time fixating on and/or lying about me.
I'd already spent three days independently corroborating Jane Doe's identity, long before the OCR scrape on that court aggregator website was brought to my attention last night.
This included speaking to multiple sources who knew Jane Doe personally, cross-checking university records, records from her sorority, her social media accounts, and other materials connected to her, as well as her local counsel of record in her home town, which is identified in the civil complaint, and consulting with a bevy of lawyers, fellow journalists, and other sources.
There *is* material on the official NY State Court docket that reveals the identity of Jane Doe, if you know what to look for. Make sure to check it out, Jared.
I had already reached 95% certainty before that court scraper site appeared last night, and had even already sent Jane Doe a request for comment several hours earlier. I'd also contacted her lawyers Thomas Giuffra and Whitney Seals.
I would obviously NEVER have published her identity based solely on scraped info from a court aggregator website.
That's why I remain completely confident that the reporting is accurate, despite the substantively irrelevant detail some people want to dwell on about the court scraper website.
My logic and thinking has always been the same as to Jane Doe's identity: I place primary blame for this whole fiasco on her notoriously unscrupulous lawyer, Giuffra, and have no ill-will toward her personally at all. I genuinely hope she is doing OK. I suspect she did not fully appreciate what she was getting herself into.
I literally communicated this exact sentiment to her directly, in the text I sent her hours before publishing yesterday.
My journalistic motivation has NEVER been about impugning on her on a personal level. I would genuinely never have any interest in doing that. It was about the sleazy litigation tactics that were deployed on her behalf: namely the cynical exploitation of judicially-decreed, media-enabled anonymity, whenever anyone can self-proclaim any sort of alleged victimization, no matter how well-founded or backed up by the evidence. This is a recurring problem I have reported on before in entirely different contexts.
You can claim I'm lying about my own motives, Jared, and that you know better what's in my own brain than I do, but you're just wrong, as usual. The reporting is accurate. Once her identity was published, the point had been sufficiently made about the need to erode these scummy lawyer-orchestrated, media-abetted anonymity strictures. Thereafter, I no longer wished to contribute to heaping her with negative attention, especially given the unbelievably intense public scrutiny around this case.
Have you noticed that none of NYT, CBS, ABC, etc. -- who are all getting un-redacted material leaked from the Title IX proceedings -- have come out and said that someone has been wrongly identified online as Jane Doe? That's because it's accurate. For better or worse. I'm sorry for her and wish her no further misfortune. Really. I don't care if you believe me -- it's true.
Now fuck off, Jared
mtracey.net/p/note-on-jane-d…
Michael Tracey published what he said was the ID of "Jane Doe" in the Cornell case. Then he took it down, claiming it was out of principle.
What he didn't admit is that he mistook info on a sketchy site for official NY court records. Let's take a look at what actually happened.
![An archived copy of Michael Tracey's original Substack post includes a screenshot from "eCourt Records" and the commentary: "It's [name redacted]. Don't blame me -- the New York Court System just posted it. Seemingly inadvertently. Oh well."](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HTpURr5WEAAFE-Z.jpg?name=orig)
ALT An archived copy of Michael Tracey's original Substack post includes a screenshot from "eCourt Records" and the commentary: "It's [name redacted]. Don't blame me -- the New York Court System just posted it. Seemingly inadvertently. Oh well."
ALT Screenshot of Michael Tracey's post on Substack titled "Note on Jane Doe." It reads: "After identifying Jane Doe earlier tonight, I have now removed the information I published. Why? Because the principle has been served: to underscore that permanently anonymizing litigants who make sensational, spectacular, reputation-destroying claims about others — so long as they can self-declare some form of victimization — cannot be countenanced. It’s destructive, and an egregious abuse of the legal system by huckster plaintiff’s lawyers. This practice has to end. Lawyers who seek to monetize this sleazy tactic should have to think A LOT HARDER about the claims they’re willing to throw out into the public domain, using impressionable clients who may not even know what they’re getting themselves into. So why have I now removed her information? Because I don’t believe she’s the main “villain” here."
DaBull Standard retweeted
Jane Doe is Lucy Craig
adding hometown Birmingham, Alabama attorney was a giveaway
Sophomore in 2024 despite error / misdirection in filing on start date
Stylized L___ ____g signature fits well
Lucy Craig, attorneys, or media would have denied by now if wrong
DaBull Standard retweeted
It's either an error or deliberate distortion by Jane Doe's notoriously unscrupulous attorney, Thomas Giuffra.
Giuffra does in fact claim in the complaint that Jane Doe started at Cornell in August 2022.
It's also true that she graduated high school in 2023. So, ostensibly, the timelines don't line up.
However: Giuffra is notorious for not doing basic due diligence, and not bothering to check basic facts -- as with the easily-disproven false claims he made about Sean "Diddy" Combs in one of his previous settlement-fishing expeditions.
All the recent reporting on the Title IX proceedings in the NYT and elsewhere establishes that Jane Doe was a sophomore at the time of the purported gang rape in October 2024.
That means Jane Doe would've had to start Cornell in August 2023 -- not August 2022 as Giuffra falsely states in the complaint. She then began her sophomore year in August 2024.
So upon further inspection, the timeline *does* add up -- notwithstanding the errors and/or misdirection thrown into the lawsuit by her notorious scam-artist lawyer.
Unclear what "incels" have to do with any of this, though.
DaBull Standard retweeted
Lucy Craig is Jane Doe
Likely stronger than half 'The Cornell 7' (285 lbs deadlift)
Maybe that's why her attorneys want people imaging some delicate girl?
