Darren Zuckerman (@DarrenZuckerman) profile picture
Miami, FL
Joined August 2022
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
one of the more ironic things about high-risk payments is that merchants paying the highest processing fees usually get no tools to prevent fraud. Stripe merchants get Radar. high-risk merchants should expect the same. so we built Sonar at @frame_payments. docs.framepayments.com/conce…
1
5
1
8
746
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
my admitted skepticism of agentic commerce made it into a @FINTECHTVglobal interview today. there's a lot to figure out. refunds, exchanges, or disputes happen, who owns these problems? @scottew's recent experience is a perfect example of how messy all this can get: nitter.gq/scottew/status/2117013…
When an AI agent buys the wrong thing, the chargeback liability sits with the merchant. @alaxic says agents acting for consumers can get things wrong, which creates disputes with more parties involved. Founder & CEO of @frame_payments joins @RemyBlaireNews.
2
5
12
1,253
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
Fans from over 100 countries are putting down a deposit on something that happens months from now. It’s normal and generally accepted, but that’s a longggg dispute window. We recently launched payments and compliance infra for one of the largest festival travel platforms: 250K+ travelers booked across 500+ events. That gap between deposit and showtime is where we shine.
2
4
199
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
gas stations realized the real money wasn't in gas. it was in everything sold around it. payments is having its convenience store moment. if you're just moving money and charging a fee, you're in trouble. wrote about why payments companies are dying.
10
3
30
5,470
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
we've been shipping a lot of improvements to Frame lately, but one of the biggest is coming this week. one piece of feedback we've heard was that our dashboard was confusing. payments and compliance were grouped together in ways that made sense to us internally, but not always to the platforms using it. fair criticism... so we fixed it. the new dashboard gives each product a clearer home and makes it easier for us to introduce new features across financial services and compliance. we're rolling out launching v2 of our Transfers API. it supports bidirectional money movement across cards, bank accounts, and wallets. oh, and accounts on Frame can now hold balances too 👀 a lot more coming.
2
5
9
883
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
really honest question. if the agent still needs approval at checkout, what friction have we actually eliminated? with that said, cool to see AMEX experimenting with authenticating purchase intent.
Today, American Express published its Intent Intelligence framework, outlining our approach to capturing and authenticating customer purchase intent before an agent executes a purchase. Read more about the framework: go.amex/1b15dV
1
2
14
1,226
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
16 accounts to 60,000+ in six months. processing volume driven by these accounts up 895% in 60 days. the growth is exciting, but what we’re building underneath it is the real story. a single infrastructure layer for payments, money movement, risk, and compliance. the more complex the business, the more valuable that becomes. and we’re just getting started.
we started building frameOS in January. ~90 days later, our first accounts were live. six months ago we had 16 accounts. now we're over 60,000. processing volume driven by these accounts is up 895% in the last 60 days alone. the idea behind frameOS is simple. compliance and financial services have operated in separate silos, despite being dependent on each other. we built them into the same system. an account can represent a user, business, or platform. each has capabilities to move money across cards, bank accounts, and wallets, which unlock as verifications like KYC, KYB, adverse media, and geo-compliance pass. we're powering use cases across prediction markets, creator platforms, telemedicine, vertical SaaS, ISVs, and more. compliance shouldn't sit alongside financial infrastructure. it should be part of the infrastructure itself.
1
1
5
231
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
7 questions to test your payments stack: How fast can you launch? How much ops work is manual? How many integrations do you maintain? Can you see fraud in full context? Can you add a payment method easily? A new market? Can you trace a payment end-to-end?
1
2
6
159
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
been fascinated with OTAs and how they pay hotels whenever you make a booking. one of the more common flows goes like this: OTA (like Expedia, Booking, etc) charges your card, issues a virtual card and emails it to hotel, hotel charges that card around check-in. two card transactions, each with processing costs + plus virtual card issuance. hotels want payment assurance at check-in without taking on the risk of ACH returns. so we’re using card networks to move money between two parties that already have a commercial relationship. feels like there could be a better way?
2
9
544
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
What is frameOS? One operating layer for payments, onboarding, identity, fraud, disputes, billing, and payouts. Most payment stacks aren’t built. They pile up one vendor at a time, until the hardest part is everything between the tools. framepayments.com/blog/what-…
2
8
10
207
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
I got into payments basically by accident. I was working with an OnlyFans competitor doing hundreds of millions revenue, paying our processor ~15% per transaction. the limitations of our processor forced me to learn payments from the ground up. CCBill had no API. no fraud monitoring. no customer profiles. no stored payment methods. we ended up building our own fraud tooling because we had no choice. I didn't know enough about payments back then to know if we could use a gateway like Authorize or NMI to improve the experience. we sold video content, so we learned fast that videos not playing meant chargebacks. video infrastructure suddenly became a payments problem. after paying 15%, this was our checkout experience. no Apple Pay. no address autocomplete. most users dropped off here lol CCBill alone processes over billions per year. but there’s a mountain of volume trapped with legacy processors in high-compliance industries. we plan to eat our way through that market on the way to Stripe.
7
5
68
7,943
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
we started building frameOS in January. ~90 days later, our first accounts were live. six months ago we had 16 accounts. now we're over 60,000. processing volume driven by these accounts is up 895% in the last 60 days alone. the idea behind frameOS is simple. compliance and financial services have operated in separate silos, despite being dependent on each other. we built them into the same system. an account can represent a user, business, or platform. each has capabilities to move money across cards, bank accounts, and wallets, which unlock as verifications like KYC, KYB, adverse media, and geo-compliance pass. we're powering use cases across prediction markets, creator platforms, telemedicine, vertical SaaS, ISVs, and more. compliance shouldn't sit alongside financial infrastructure. it should be part of the infrastructure itself.
9
9
2
31
1,567
Hot take, built on LegitScript's own numbers from a couple weeks ago: Telehealth applications for LegitScript certification doubled in the past year. LegitScript puts the increase at 101%. Founders now treat certification as step one. At @frame_payments , we worry about step two. Certification gets you ads on Google and Meta and a path to card acceptance. But..it does not keep your merchant account open. Your payment provider keeps watching after you pass: -Where your prescribers are licensed, and where you ship. -What your ads claim, and what the label says. -How hard you make it to cancel a refill subscription. Fail one and the seal in your footer will not save the account. A year from now every serious telehealth brand will be certified. The winners will be the ones who kept doing the work after the seal arrived. Telehealth founders: which was harder, getting LegitScript certified or getting a payment provider to approve you?
2
2
1
5
615
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
mood heading into the weekend after the week we just had at @frame_payments . a lot coming over the next couple weeks. new customers going live, new features shipping, and some of the coolest stuff we’ve built yet.
1
6
1
22
985
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
"Pay for what you use" sounds fair until finance has to forecast it. Usage pricing without a predictable bill just relocates the fight from seats to reconciliation. If your buyer cannot ballpark next month before the invoice lands, the meter is not a feature. It is a support ticket.
1
1
13
Been on a lot of calls this year with telehealth & peptides operators. It's the same story every time. Processor approved them months ago. Then without notice, their account gets flagged or frozen, and now they're scrambling for a new provider. Meanwhile they're paying a KYC vendor, a fraud tool, a chargeback company and a billing platform on the side. 5+ contracts. 5+ integrations. Nobody owns the whole thing or knows what to do when it breaks. That's the problem we built Frame for. One API for the entire payments & compliance infrastructure. Cards, ACH, RTP, patient identity, 3DS, monitoring, disputes, subscriptions. Compliance is built into the stack, not stitched on after. And we underwrite telehealth up front, so the freeze isn't coming after you get through. Curious how many vendors are in your stack right now. Bet it's more than you think... ✌
1
17
74
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
as we go deeper working with these platforms, one thing I keep coming back to is how much signal we see. we see more than most processors because we also handle compliance for a lot of these platforms. we see payouts patterns, spend behavior, location, and the identity data. when you put this together, it’s a fuller picture of a user. it can flag when someone might need limits imposed before it becomes a real problem. it's a realllllly fine line though. protecting users from fraud is our job. protecting people from themselves isn't. we're not deciding how someone spends their paycheck, but we can make sure platforms have the information to make that call themselves. the signal only matters if it turns into something they can act on.
A 29-year-old pest control salesman says he bets on sports every day, wagering between $80,000 and $120,000 a year — as much as or more than his $97,000 salary. He tells @JimAxelrod he sometimes puts an entire paycheck on his bets. cbsnews.com/news/sports-bett…
1
5
7
1,046
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
the struggle described in this piece makes sense. as a founder, your instinct is to remove friction and grow. I think there's a happy medium between being overly sensitive to risk and being reckless about it. prediction markets are a unique fraud surface because a win pays out in cash. we process payments for one at Frame and see the same patterns. stolen cards, card testing, velocity attacks, etc. we think the approach should be to push verification upstream. we combine device signals, KYC, $0 3DS auth, card/address name matching, and more into onboarding to tie the user to the payment method before they transact. this is what a good UX looks like…verification happens before the first transaction so you have fewer actual fraud losses (friendly fraud is another story). wsj.com/business/polymarkets…
8
11
358
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
to be clear, anyone of any race can be named Laderian. the man in this ID photo is certainly not... Laderian. this is the kind of tacit knowledge that’s hard to train into a risk model. sometimes everything technically passes, but a human looks at it for three seconds and knows something is off. at @frame_payments , our underwriting models recommend decisions, but a human still confirms them before we set a customer live. human-in-the-loop still matters a lot in risk.
5
3
7
1,277
Darren Zuckerman retweeted
we’re sponsoring a builder house in Austin. mostly to make sure nobody says “we’ll just use Stripe.” sign up to attend and we’ll throw ya $100k in processing credits for whatever you’re building.
1
1
11
762