Devin Cornelius retweeted
that he has not committed a felony offense speaks volumes about his great character
Devin Cornelius retweeted
Man, the participation trophy crowd calling in to pre game to remind us how good the Bills have been in the regular season. I’m going to have a conniption.
Devin Cornelius retweeted
Diggs
Dianna Russini praises NFL player for daily 5 a.m. texts that kept her ‘strong’ after ‘nightmare’ Mike Vrabel scandal trib.al/s5VlWdL
Devin Cornelius retweeted
Mike Vrabel always looks like he's wondering if everyone else can smell that fart.
Devin Cornelius retweeted
Was literally explaining the, "society falls when old men don't plant trees they will never sit under" to my neighbor (boomer)
He said he didn't get it and why would he plant trees if won't be around to see them
Devin Cornelius retweeted
If you’re clearing $200k (aka making $205k) and buy a $90k loaded Tahoe you’re an idiot
Devin Cornelius retweeted
Why would an established financial advisor choose W2 at a 40% payout when they could go 1099 at 85%?
I actually think there are a ton of reasons.
A very large or fast-growing advisor who needs a support team but doesn't want to spend their time managing hiring, firing, benefits, vendors, HR, etc.
An advisor who owns equity and is focused on building long-term enterprise value rather than maximizing this year's payout.
The rainmaker who loves bringing in new business but has zero interest in handling service.
The retiree looking for succession.
A lot of financial advisors ask me whether they should go RIA or BD.
I think there's a better place to start...
Should you be W2 or 1099?
With 1099, you typically own your client relationships, have a much higher payout (65%+), and have more control over your business.
But you're also responsible for your own benefits, hiring staff, and building the infrastructure to run your practice.
With W2, you typically don't own the client relationships, and the payout is lower. But you may have more support, resources to help grow your business, and even an opportunity to build equity in the firm.
Neither is necessarily better. It depends on what you're looking for.
Some advisors want the independence and ownership that comes with 1099. Others would rather have the support and structure of a W2 model.
And what makes sense today may not make sense five years from now.
Devin Cornelius retweeted
What is the point of a politician — let alone a literal vice president — who says he understood all of this and yet did absolutely nothing about it
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Devin Cornelius retweeted
That’s exceptionally funny and just funny enough to happen.
Devin Cornelius retweeted
Please be my new life.
Blitz & Pressure Rates, Week 8 Only
Despite their high blitz rate, MIN generated relatively few pressures.
Data: @FantasyPtsData
Devin Cornelius retweeted
We got your back, New York!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Several figures here aren’t federal results or NY-specific. The $472B combines US wide pledges: Micron's $250B is nationwide (NY site $100B) Anthropic's $50B covers TX and NY. The 48% murder drop is from NY's state run GIVE program (28 departments, Jan – May 2026).
arkolith.com/news/news-micr…
therepublic.com/?p=843020
governor.ny.gov/news/safer-str…
Devin Cornelius retweeted
Pretty much sums it up
This piece by @clairecm is a must read. These are not ideological objections...
“I feel like one of the Democrats’ main topics in every election is for minorities, for immigrants,” he said. “I feel like their thing is to hit this niche group and get all their votes.”
nytimes.com/2026/11/02/upsho…
Devin Cornelius retweeted
People are angry because they pay $28,000 a year for something they can't price, can't compare and can't understand. Then the pharmacy charges them less if they pay cash than it does if they use the insurance they paid $28,000 for. Broken is an understatement.
Devin Cornelius retweeted
The Bills paying homage to 1973 and the first season at Rich Stadium would be my guess to the this weeks endzone paint theme.
















































