defiorz.eth | t3n3t.bnb

Great #PulseX news! Aggregated routing across v1 and v2 has been sighted on main net.

Visualization and categorization make it easier to for more leaves to grow on the branches in your mind. This is the same text, but so much easier to understand with the indentations more easily viewed.

The crypto lawyers out there aren't using all the defenses available to them. I came up with these ideas to help them. As blockchains are communications networks, they are protected by Section 230. There's lots of other theories and case law I've found to help you guys out there. It's important to use all of the defenses available to you. Shoutout to XRP and Coinbase for fighting the good fight for freedom. Freedom of Speech & Expression: • Cryptocurrency code is protected speech (Bernstein v. DOJ; Junger v. Daley) • Banning code access violates free speech (Universal City Studios v. Corley) • Disclosure mandates compel speech (Wooley v. Maynard; Riley v. Nat’l Federation of Blind) • Vague standards chill protected speech (Reno v. ACLU) • Anonymity enhances free speech (McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission) Privacy Rights • Warrantless surveillance violates reasonable expectation of privacy (Carpenter v. US; Kyllo v. US) • Identity verification rules contravene informational privacy (Whalen v. Roe) • Compelled disclosure invades privacy (McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission) • Tracking blockchain transactions violates privacy (Carpenter v. US) • Constitutional right to informational privacy (NASA v. Nelson) Freedom of Association • Cryptocurrency communities are expressive associations (Boy Scouts v. Dale; Roberts v. Jaycees) • Identity verification rules violate association (NAACP v. Alabama) • Surveillance deters association (Roberts v. Jaycees) Limits on SEC Power • SEC v. W.J. Howey Co - devised investment contract test • SEC v. C.M. Joiner Leasing Corp - securities laws don’t apply to commodities • Reves v. Ernst & Young - securities laws don’t apply to currency-like notes • SEC v. SG Ltd - no securities where purchasers received website access No Common Enterprise • Gary Plastic Packaging Corp v. Merrill Lynch - no common enterprise with independent control Compelled Speech Violations • Wooley v. Maynard - prohibits compelled speech • Riley v. National Federation of Blind - mandated speech scrutinized Right to Informational Privacy • NASA v. Nelson - constitutional right to information privacy Administrative Law Violations • Retroactive enforcement fails due process (Landgraf v. USI Film Products) • Vague standards violate due process (Sessions v. Dimaya; US v. Davis) • Lack of notice violates due process (Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham; FCC v. Fox Television Stations) • Failed to provide notice and comment (Chamber of Commerce v. SEC) • Arbitrary and capricious actions (Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.) Right to Financial Privacy • Monitoring blockchain transactions violates privacy (Carpenter v. US) • Identity verification rules violate financial privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut) Self-Determination Rights • Restricting cryptocurrency contravenes international law on self-determination (UN Charter, Art 1; ICCPR, Art 1) Cryptocurrencies as Commodities/Currencies • CFTC v. McDonnell - virtual currencies are commodities • U.S. v. Faiella - Bitcoin is currency Unconstitutional Vagueness • Vague laws allow arbitrary enforcement (Johnson v. United States) • Laws must provide fair notice (Connally v. General Construction Co.) Regulatory Overreach • Agencies cannot expand power without Congressional authorization (MCI v. AT&T) • Crypto regulation should come from legislature (Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund) Blockchains Similar to ISPs • Running a blockchain is like being an ISP by providing data access (47 U.S. Code § 230) • ISPs have immunity for third-party content (47 U.S. Code § 230) • Blockchains have user-generated content like ISP sites (47 U.S. Code § 230) • Blockchain users are publishers like ISP users (47 U.S. Code § 230) • Blockchains deserve ISP protections as user-generated content networks (17 U.S. Code § 512) You should also notice the defenses Coinbase is using. Failure to state a claim, No authority to regulate, Major questions doctrine, wallets aren't brokers, abuse of discretion, equitable estoppel, unclean hands, laches. You should also be notice the Torres ruling in XRPs favor and the that and judge Katherine Polk Failla's ruling in favor in Uniswap's favor. She is also the judge in the Coinbase case. docdroid.net/APrJolt/risley-… There's more defenses, not here, and this should be a great help to you fine legal folks out there. Blockchains are speech. You do math, you publish it. Someone else checks your math. Peer to peer. Securely removing middlemen for a decade and replacing trust with mathematical proof. Many powerful quotes exist in these cases which would be quite useful for public commenting periods, and in defense of the citizens constitutional rights elsewhere.

Richard heart teaches you things no one else can, or will. You do not custody coins, the blockchain does. You do not send coins. You publish updates to a public database. The coins are right where they always were. You do not have a cryptocurrency wallet, you have a keychain. Every addresses was created and published by individuals through their own labor. Every update was created and published by individuals through their own labor. There aren't really any coins, just numbers people have a penchant for. Like characters in literature. If the value was in your wallet, the value would double when you copied your wallet. It doesn't. If the value was in the blockchain, the value would double when the blockchain was copied. It doesn't. The value is a shared fiction, subjective and volatile, subject to whim and fancy, yet worth $ billions. You don't use the blockchain, you run it, it's software. In the blockchain, you're not a user, you're a publisher. Blockchain software is publishing software. Speech is speech. Code is speech. The blockchain is both speech and publishing software, and as such, should be doubly protected; Like you would protect books and the pen.

I told you PulseChain.com would help reduce #Ethereum gas costs. It has. I told you people would like to trade the same tickers and code, but with 100x less gas costs. They do. Some free PRC20s are already more liquid on PulseX than their original ERC20s on Uniswap. What do you think happens if you have the same tickers and code, on a faster network, with more decentralized mining, with 400x lower fees? Now what if PulseX has more liquidity for your coin than Uniswap as well? What if there's more upside potential for the free copy than the original?

Protip: To learn what's truly true, you must test your theories. Sometimes you can't guess your way to greatness.

Validators currently earn 23.8% APY in $PLS. You can support the network while paying yourself and you can even connect your wa||et to your own validator and never have to worry about someone else's rpc going down or tying your IP address to your crypto addresses. launchpad.pulsechain.com/en/

Random thoughts. 1. Near everything in crypto is down. PLSX, PLS and INC, and HEX on PulseChain literally didn't exist last month, launched at $0, and are now worth millions. That sounds like up. HEX on Pulse is even worth more than HEX on #Ethereum. That miracle of gas savings is one near any community can choose to have at will as they were all given free copies of their coins at launch. No one has to pay the higher ETH gas fees unless they really want to. A better option exists. Some communities are actually learning this now and taking advantage. 2. The stock market is down. 3. Houses are down. 4. You probably know people very well who helped lower prices to where they are. Perhaps intimately. Perhaps they're you. No rain drop thinks it's the flood. 5. Can you imagine the disgusting hubris of attacking those that didn't sell? The all time grand champion of not selling? The guy that accumulated more than anyone else? Unrelated, what's your favorite way to reduce your $600,000.00 a month AWS bills after savings plans.