Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Instead of stimulating mostly unproductive debate, #publishers should use their profits to create a data sharing infrastructure with peer review data available to the community for systematic and rigorours research. We suggested this five years ago here: nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Our #preregistration template for simulation studies, spearheaded by Björn, is now available on OSF! See below for a brief interview with the @OSFramework about the template and why we created it...
cos.io/blog/introducing-the-…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
I just became president of a scientific society and my first act was to disagree with one of my heroes...Arie Kruglanski gave a keynote arguing social psychology needs MORE Big Beautiful Theories. I think that's exactly backwards. Here's why...
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
New report on the first year of the UK's Metascience Unit - never more important given the contestable nature of science & innovation investment right now #Metascience2025 gov.uk/government/publicatio…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Excellent meta-research: A trial within a large trial shows that consent form length impacts recruitment.
Please consider too much text can exclude vulnerable groups / We need to rethink consent forms, too much information may harm.
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Scientists: size (of your peer review) doesn't matter, it's about the *content*
Also scientists:
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Peer Review Week will be held from 15 to 19 September 2025. Cast your vote till May 31st on which of the below should be this year's theme. forms.gle/RJSWd78aK8xqo1Jw7
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
There is still time to sign up for the last workshop of this academic year at PMGS, "Scientific Criticism and Peer Review," by @renebekkers
Check out the details here:
paulmeehlschool.github.io/wo…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Here's some good news!
The file drawer problem may have diminished in recent years, at least in social science survey experiments
"This suggests increased recognition of the importance of null results."
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
I am hiring a PhD student on the meaningful interpretation of effect sizes as part of my VICI funded project. This is a 4 year paid position in a welcoming and collaborative environment. Find out more or apply at tue.nl/werken-bij-tue/vacatu…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Applications now open for our PhD course in Open Science and Reproducible Research at @karolinskainst. The course will be in English and fully online. Open to PhD students from anywhere, with no fee. Link follows.
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
We are looking for RAs to work with us on a new meta-science & replication project, joint with @I4Replication, now with focus on environmental (economics) topics such as air pollution & carbon pricing. RAs can work remotely but must be located in Germany rwi-essen.de/fileadmin/user_…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
We launched MetaROR (MetaResearch Open Review) with @aimos_inc to make peer review more efficient and more rewarding.
Join us TOMORROW for our launch seminar to learn more about the vision behind MetaROR!
📅 26 November
🕓 15:00 - 16:30 GMT / 16:00-17:30 CET
Register here: eventbrite.co.uk/e/introduci…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
PCI Psychology is a bold new effort seeking to improve peer review by separating it from journals and the publication process. Join us by signing up here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Very excited to share our new preprint! 📢
We investigated how often researchers misinterpret statistically nonsignificant results as the absence of an effect. Spoiler: it’s a lot (~81% of 599 articles)! Dive into our findings and their implications here: osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/hm…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
✨@CAMARADES_ are hiring! ✨
We are looking for a research assistant to work across a diverse range of exciting #metaresearch projects. Learn more and apply at: shorturl.at/PAo80
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
New paper! The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science.
Check a novel interactive platform hosting 1,239 originals paired w/ replication findings
forrt-replications.shinyapps….
Published in @up_jopd led by @aufdroeseler doi.org/10.5334/jopd.101
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
🙋 What if we’d turn the peer reviewed publishing venue Open Research Europe into a collective, non-profit #OpenAccess service for the public good?
Explore our latest publication to find out more: europa.eu/!9WYp8q
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
NIH Data Sharing Index (S-index) Challenge - $1,000,000 Cash Prize! Goal: The S-index Challenge aims to advance the NIH mission by actively promoting data sharing and developing a robust metric to reward exemplary data sharers.
challenge.gov/?challenge=nih…
Olmo van den Akker retweeted
Do pre-registration & registered reports reduce research waste? (spoiler, YES, based on 26 meta-studies)
Would love to get your feedback, especially on proposed measures to increase registration in ecology
Read more ecoevorxiv.org/repository/vi…
nature.com/articles/s41559-0… DM for PDF


































