BredoStrategy

$INFER $imdUSD Infer Protocol — a new financial layer for the agent economy $IMD There have been some loud posts on CT about our agents finally making us money. I even reposted one. ty, His Dudeness: nitter.gq/cryptokarlheinz/status… And yes, they are. Especially the agents that helped build a new protocol: imdUSD nitter.gq/imdusd imdusd.com/ But where does the money come from? Isn’t it just a stablecoin? Let me break it down for you. First, there’s $imdUSD. It has two main use cases: a) Payments within the agent economy. We need a more predictable unit of account since $IMD is volatile. b) Borrowing against collateral. You believe in IMD long-term but need cash? Instead of selling part of your position, you can borrow imdUSD against your collateral. Of course, there are risks, including liquidation. Then there’s $INFER — the token tied to the economics of Infer Protocol itself. You don’t need it to pay for jobs or borrow imdUSD. Its purpose is to benefit from the protocol’s economic activity. According to brajon, the dev, fees flow into the Treasury, and protocol revenue is meant to support staking. So the idea is: People borrow → the protocol collects fees → revenue flows into the Treasury → the Treasury buys $INFER → the tokens are gradually distributed to stakers through sINFER. See the Ponzi-like mechanic here? 👀 The real question is whether the protocol can generate sustainable revenue. Buybacks don’t happen by magic. so the bullish case is simple: imdUSD gets real usage → more loans, swaps and fees → more revenue for the Treasury → more $INFER buybacks → more INFER distributed to stakers. The bearish case is even simpler: Nobody really uses imdUSD → fees stay low → buybacks stay small → $INFER is left as just another ecosystem token with limited utility. Docs: whitepaper.imdusd.com/