Pinned Tweet
Confused About Mental Health?
Start here: A Simple Guide for Complex People
open.substack.com/pub/toosim…
Dr Beech 🌤 retweeted
Two models of how to be resilient and live even in difficult circumstances. A metaphor:
1. Having “skin”
2. Wearing “armor”
Skin: A person with healthy psychological skin makes use of sensation, rich and even intense emotion, leaning into feeling to move through feeling. Such a
Great thread. 👏👏
I know it is an infinitesimal percentage of the population... but the few souls who have seen, or get to see @KemtrupTweets (Kristian Kemtrup) as their therapist are a fortunate lot.
It undoubtedly does. Among the evidence for this is the notably lower response rates to placebo (vs. active medications) in controlled trials. For most controlled trials in other anxiety conditions and depression, there is a higher response to placebo, than for OCD.
Would you not agree that infants arrive w factory settings for seeking undifferentiated need fulfillment? Variance in degree, but an infant can't "learn not to need" others. Maybe learn "others are not available as I'd like" or "distracting from this need = less distressed" ?
“If a child’s parents are bad objects, he cannot reject them…for he cannot do without them.”
Listen i like analytic ideas but this is lazy horseshit fantasizing about what is “normal” or typical.
The idea that kids “have to ‘need’ their parents” is empirically not true. Many kids dissociate and learn not to need objects. Many kids are autistic. Many kids have (early) antisocial tendencies. Other infants might be more extroverted and narcissitic in their temperament, and not care about objects. Others are unintelligent (memory deficits) and not able to be aware of how “bad” an object the parents are. Various types of internal dynamics exist and not all infants have the same hardware and software for “needing” an external object.
Dr Beech 🌤 retweeted
I'm not one to get into this "debate" usually. But please, let's do better than universal, definitive claims. They erase nuance. Diagnosis "may" lower ambitions. It "may" stop people from learning how to manage. Maybe, at times, for some, with certian conditions
Give me strength
Neurologist, Suzanne O'Sullivan on how giving a diagnosis such as ADHD is not a neutral act. It may look like a solution, but it defines people 'by what they cannot do...lowers ambitions' and stops people from learning how to manage everyday challenges. telegraph.co.uk/health-fitne…
"...one of the most humbling experiences of my career, working with patients with psychosis, is that none of us have particularly steady access to reality. We are very constrained by our five senses, by our physical form, by temporality...there's plenty of things we do not know about the universe. So it is complete hubris to assume we know better than the patient."
Very interesting conversation between Dr. Max @wtf_is_life_pod and psychiatrist/psychoanalyst Irene Hurford, MD. Worth a watch/listen.
A very special episode on the art and science of psychological healing ft. dr Irene hurford. What it is to treat psychosis, to treat brain and mind, to grow the soul. From pharmacology and ontology and back again! Please share! Very proud of this one!
youtu.be/qXZ0RoUrHYY?si=_qrb…
I agree there are many concepts in clinical psychology, psychoanalysis, & psychotherapy that ARE abstract, and not reliable. But object permanence, + various models of developmental stages (especially tasks) are among the most reliable observable phenomena of human development.
I generally agree. Understanding developmental issues, introjects, object relationships, narcissistic injuries, etc. can be very helpful.
The only issue is:
We don’t have reliable categories of developmental stages or tasks. We have vague abstractions like “object permanence,” but even then, under stress people can “regress.”
What do we do? Count the number of hours a person can “mentalize consistently”? In what situations?
All we have are vague and unreliable abstractions, prone to giving the clinician the freedom to fantasize and fill in the gaps with whatever WISHES THE CLINICIAN HAS ABOUT THE PATIENT AND THEIR CIRCUMSTANCES.
Fin
“Winnicot offers an important antidote to the current proliferation of self-help techniques and the ‘therapizing’ of popular culture: treatment, to be effective, must be grounded in a developmental theory of emotional growth.”
D. Goldman, 1993
This is very succinctly insightful. 👏🏼
Dr Beech 🌤 retweeted
“Psychiatric treatment is often enough a frustrating affair, for the patient, for the clinician, for the caregivers, basically for everyone involved…”
On imperfect tools
psychiatrymargins.com/p/mayb…
Dr Beech 🌤 retweeted
Therapy for psychosis. Many of my colleagues find the idea silly.
When I led mental health in a large jail, we had people who were grossly psychotic and incoherent and still did not meet criteria for involuntary treatment. A common response from psychiatrists was: he won’t take meds, what can I do?
A lot.
You can show up regularly and frequently. You can be kind without being naive. You can tell them where they are, what is happening, what is required to leave, and that their family has been calling. If psychosis is, in part, a retreat from a reality that feels impossible to live in, then part of the work is making reality less terrifying.
After weeks of daily visits, many of those patients accepted antipsychotics. I am often critical of psychiatric medication. Antipsychotics for impairing psychosis are still, generally, effective and humane, despite significant side effects.
Signing off because someone is psychotic and refusing pills is misunderstanding what psychiatry can be.
Psychodynamic therapy fell out of use for schizophrenia after 4 small trials found no benefit for core symptoms, but can it help functioning?
Here it did, as add-on to antipsychotics, in the first large trial to test that outcome:
psych-partners.com/psychodyn…
Dr Beech 🌤 retweeted
Projection says: “This unbearable thing is in you, not me.”
Projective identification goes further: “Now I need you to feel it, carry it, act it out, and prove that I was right.”
That’s why it feels so eerie in therapy and intimate relationships. You feel recruited into acting out a dynamic from another persons script.
The other person evacuates an unbearable self-state into the relationship, then begins treating you as if you are the bearer of that disowned self-state.
The clinical task is to notice the role you are being invited to take on, then metabolize the emotional pressure, and return it in a form that can be thought and reprocessed until it no longer provokes unconscious enactment.
This is an excellent thread, very insightful.
That’s bad for the pharmaceutical business model but very positive for for the psychedelics business models.
I hope no one construes this other tragic case as representative of standard or even common psychiatric treatment, or "take home ketamine" as representative or even remotely similar to standard psychiatric medications.
Everyone knows the Lindsay Clancy case. Almost nobody knows this one, and the reason why should stop you cold: when a mother dies alongside her children, there is no trial, no media coverage, and no one digs into what happened in the months before.
Tranyelle Harshman was a 32-year-old Wyoming mother of four. No history of violence. No suicidal history. Her husband describes a loving mother and an incredible wife, and he is standing by her, just like Lindsay Clancy's husband. There was no affair, no conflict, no motive. I searched.
What there was, according to the Wall Street Journal's reporting and the wrongful death lawsuit her mother has filed, was take-home ketamine prescribed for postpartum depression. When Tranyelle reported heart palpitations and feeling disconnected from reality for days, she was reportedly told it often gets worse before it gets better, and her dose was increased. After taking that increased dose, she shot her four daughters and then herself. Toxicology reportedly showed ketamine at four times the threshold associated with mind-altering effects.
I helped develop a ketamine-based drug during my time in pharma. I know these side effect tables: dissociation in nearly half of patients, hallucinations, agitation, fear. This is why ketamine is normally given under clinical supervision, not at home, alone, with children napping upstairs.
The pattern from the Clancy case is identical. A struggling mother reports that a drug is making her worse, and the answer is a higher dose. I will keep saying this until it changes: when a patient gets worse on a psychiatric drug, that is information, not impatience. You do not double down on it.





















