Pinned Tweet
$QNT gets lumped in with every other interoperability token.
I think that's a mistake, and the reason goes back to how the internet itself was designed.
Quant has been designed to be "Internet-Scale".
But what does that mean?
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
If I knew who came up with this line, I'd give him full credit.
I wish I had thought of it.
You’ve been warned.
$QNT
Decentralised oracles could lower manipulation in #DeFi but integrating trust in an inherently trustless system needs more than full decentralisation. Crypto-based #DeFi is likely to remain the preserve of cryptoassets, not real-world assets bis.org/publ/bisbull76.htm
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
$QNT JUST LEFT THE MAJORS IN THE DUST.
Quant: +109.5% in 30 days.
Meanwhile:
BTC: -5%
XRP: -16.2%
SOL: -16.4%
While the majors bled, Quant more than doubled.
Still calling it a bank-coin meme?
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
I come bearing gifts. 🎁
With the latest deals signed and Fusion set to open to retail, a lot of new people are about to look at $QNT. The information they need on how the token actually works is scattered across old Telegram messages, AMAs and Quant’s website, and some of it, like the early papers on token utility, isn’t on the website at all. Quant has also retired its Telegram comms, so asking every newcomer to dig through chat history isn’t realistic.
So I’ve put it all in one place, with sources for claims: quamfylounge.com
I actually blocked him because he made baseless claims, called me a scammer posting lies.
I saw he posted about $QNT for the first time just after the TCH announcement.
The nerve on this guy..
Replying to @JanGold_
These are unverified and unsubstantiated claims with original and out of date paper on $QNT's token mechanics. @DutchAlchemist has actually blocked me for pointing this out. So, he basically compiled all of these messages out of propaganda to get people investing into a token that @quantnetwork specifically keeps quiet about. They have not announced anything about the token and how it will play out into their overledger, specifically how much qnt is locked up per bank and what % of qnt is locked up per transaction.
Untill this is announced by quant the company, QNT is driven by scarcity and demand alone.
Made a few user experience improvements to quamfylounge.com
Should be easier to use on mobile now.
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
QNT is up approximately 16% today and roughly 100% month-to-date, decoupling from a broader market where BTC fell 4.6% over the same stretch.
ethereum:0x4a220e6096b25eadb88358cb44068a3248254675 bitcoin:native
I come bearing gifts. 🎁
With the latest deals signed and Fusion set to open to retail, a lot of new people are about to look at $QNT. The information they need on how the token actually works is scattered across old Telegram messages, AMAs and Quant’s website, and some of it, like the early papers on token utility, isn’t on the website at all. Quant has also retired its Telegram comms, so asking every newcomer to dig through chat history isn’t realistic.
So I’ve put it all in one place, with sources for claims: quamfylounge.com
The Quant x The Clearing House hints have been there since the beginning.
ethereum:0x4a220e6096b25eadb88358cb44068a3248254675
Get ten random people off the street and start a company together with equal vote and power between them.
The company is doomed from day one.
That’s democracy spending half your life’s work.
Pretending to solve anything, lie to your face and blaming you for everything.
Dutch Alchemist retweeted
I’ve had a feeling for a while that $QNT has quietly outperformed its whole generation, so I tried to check it properly.
The group is every token that started trading in 2018. I went by first trading date rather than ICO date because I wanted projects that went through the same market and cycle phases: all of them listed into the 2018 crash and had to survive a full bear market before the 2021 run.
Each project is measured from $0 to today’s market cap. I didn’t use ICO prices, because presale discounts and bonus rounds make them unreliable, or multiples “from the bottom”, which depend completely on which day you choose.
Market cap on its own flatters tokens that still have a lot of supply locked up, so each one is discounted by its float: market cap × circulating supply ÷ max supply. A project with half its tokens still to come gets credit for half its market cap. $QNT has a fixed supply of 14.6M that has been fully unlocked since 2019, so it takes no discount. Cronos does, which is why it drops from first on raw market cap to third here.
1000+ dead 2018 projects aren’t on the chart for obvious reasons.
What makes this more interesting to me is that $QNT got here before its main product is live.
@FusionLayer25 , hasn’t gone beyond initial mainnet tests with institutions, so the staking and transaction volume it’s built for hasn’t started yet. It has signed clients that settle trillions a day.
Every other project in this chart is valued on what it already does.
I’ve had a feeling for a while that $QNT has quietly outperformed its whole generation, so I tried to check it properly.
The group is every token that started trading in 2018. I went by first trading date rather than ICO date because I wanted projects that went through the same market and cycle phases: all of them listed into the 2018 crash and had to survive a full bear market before the 2021 run.
Each project is measured from $0 to today’s market cap. I didn’t use ICO prices, because presale discounts and bonus rounds make them unreliable, or multiples “from the bottom”, which depend completely on which day you choose.
Market cap on its own flatters tokens that still have a lot of supply locked up, so each one is discounted by its float: market cap × circulating supply ÷ max supply. A project with half its tokens still to come gets credit for half its market cap. $QNT has a fixed supply of 14.6M that has been fully unlocked since 2019, so it takes no discount. Cronos does, which is why it drops from first on raw market cap to third here.
1000+ dead 2018 projects aren’t on the chart for obvious reasons.
What makes this more interesting to me is that $QNT got here before its main product is live.
@FusionLayer25 , hasn’t gone beyond initial mainnet tests with institutions, so the staking and transaction volume it’s built for hasn’t started yet. It has signed clients that settle trillions a day.
Every other project in this chart is valued on what it already does.
They are literally admitting the great replacement is real but blaming it on russia😭
🇪🇺🇷🇺 Ursula von der Leyen says RUSSIA IS USING MASS MIGRATION as a weapon against EUROPE
The EU chief accuses Russia of deliberately pushing migrants toward European borders to overwhelm authorities, spread fear and divide the continent.
She now wants new emergency powers to deal with these situations.
Brussels has SPENT YEARS defending migration and asylum as part of Europe's values.
Now it's warning that hostile governments can exploit those same systems to destabilize Europe.
Completely ridiculous. And pretty revealing who is actually behind it all...
Writer: Oliver
The CoinMarketCap list shows you that the assets go up a lot more when there's retail txs happening on its platform.
It makes the tokens more tangible in utility.
$QNT has yet to open up @FusionLayer25 to retail.
Staking, multichain apps that feel like one chain, Any to Any DEX.
Even assets that don't have smart contracts on their network.
None of it requires synthetic wrapped token versions.
Using multiple chains without manually getting gas tokens for each.
No fragmented liquidity or high slippage.
No USDC across tens of chains, just one balance spendable anywhere. Unified Tokens. (uToken)
Oracles linking order books across chains is aggregation, not unification. It’s a meta-search engine pretending to be a single market.
Fusion links uTokens to institutional levels of liquidity into a single settlement environment.
There's no place else I'd park my capital right now.
NFA.




















