
Exploring how technology is reshaping work, money, and personal freedom 🎙️ @SmartEconomyPod (170+ eps) 📝 @NeoNewsToday (2,000+ articles)
Colorado
Joined May 2018
- Tweets26.9K
- Following1.5K
- Followers8.2K
- Likes95.9K
Pinned Tweet
You don't need to know how to code or hire an expensive developer to build a professional website
I built mine in just over two days using ChatGPT and WordPress
Here's how I did it, the tools I used, and a copy-paste prompt to get you started 👇
On-chain privacy is a lot like the police: no one thinks they need it until they do
Much like the police, the word "privacy" can evoke very different feelings
For example: Why would you need privacy if you're not doing anything bad?
Or: My neighbor *did not get* wrench attacked because no one could see what was in their wallet
@aztecnetwork launched Tierra this week, offering:
> the privacy of cash
> the programmability of smart contracts
> the security of mathematics
All without having to trust a centralized sequencer or Security Council to keep the network running
Aztec relies on a decentralized network of sequencers and provers, secured by ethereum:0xa27ec0006e59f245217ff08cd52a7e8b169e62d2, with no single company controlling block production
And V6 of its Stage 2 zk-rollup introduced some major upgrades:
> ~1s private proof generation (2x faster)
> Ethereum-to-Aztec messages in as little as 12s (previously ~2m on average)
> Formal verification of core cryptography
> AI-powered security testing
> Fixes for critical vulnerabilities discovered in V5
What is formal verification?
Imagine building a bridge
You could drive thousands of cars across it every day to test whether it breaks
Or you could use mathematics to prove that specific parts of its design meet defined safety requirements
That's the difference between testing and formal verification
Aztec has combined mathematical verification with stricter cryptographic proof validation, improved security checks, and automated vulnerability testing
The result is a significantly hardened version of the network
Now, privacy is becoming more practical, cross-chain usability is improving, and security is becoming an even bigger priority
Private transactions are starting to feel less experimental and more like everyday software
It's a good time to start looking into Aztec if you're:
> a developer who wants to build programmable smart contracts with zero-knowledge proofs
> a user who wants to send stablecoins and explore private savings through @zk_money
>an institution interested in bringing assets like tokenized equities or mortgages on-chain while protecting sensitive information
It’s 2026, privacy shouldn’t require permission from a centralized entity
And using it shouldn’t feel like an experiment
For more information on Tierra, check out Aztec’s sleek new branding👇
Click here to check out Aztec’s new design:
aztec.network/?utm_source=x&…
Today was one of those days where I felt like I was spinning my wheels on my agents -- like I just wasted hours of my life
I'm building a "Waterfall Agent" that repurposes long-form content
One of those tools I want is a Tweet composer that will:
> transcribe video
> extract key themes
> make tweets from key themes
> make tweets sound exactly like me
> one-shot the copy and don't mess up
Last week with Grok Bot I scraped every tweet I've ever written, and thought it'd be good training material
It wasn't
I ended up getting a bunch of hot garbage, except it kind of sounded like me (so, heck, maybe it was on point lol)
What am I going to do moving forward?
Like a luddite, I'm going to hand craft tweets for each of my long-form and short-form videos that come out of the Waterfall Agent
Then, I'm going to feed my agent the copy for each of these tweets
Rinse and repeat the process over several iterations
I'm not sure it's going to work, but I'm gonna give it the old college effort
For curious minds, this is the first AI edited video on the 4 Pillars of Content Marketing Blockchain Ecosystems
Would love your feedback if you're interested in the subject matter
youtu.be/dTod4t3VBhc
🧵 Publishing more content isn't a strategy for winning the minds of users
It won't help craft and disseminate your narrative either
Various funnels, or pillars, help carry the load
Here's the framework I've build over 8.5 years of creating content in blockchain 👇
Pillar 4: Retention
No one has time to watch every corner of an ecosystem; you've got to help them out
A weekly newsletter does it for them
What's most important, though... consistency
The quiet weeks when it feels like nothing is happening is when it matters most
Which of the 4 pillars do blockchain ecosystems overlook the most?
Full breakdown here 👇
youtu.be/dTod4t3VBhc
I trained Claude Code to edit my long-form videos, and it took 5 rounds of review to finally get a cut I'd sign off on
The input was one 31-minute recording (which I'd originally meant to record for 15 minutes but went too long, whoops)
The headaches:
> Whisper's word timestamps ended 0.14 to 0.60 seconds early, which clipped the last sound of words
> an edit anchored to a phrase landed on the wrong take, 83 seconds away from when I actually said it
> one cut kept a 0.13 second scrap of the word "And" multiple times... so. many. times
The steps we took:
> transcribe the recording locally with Whisper
> measure where each word really ends from the audio, not the transcript
> add a gate that checks every cut for clipped words
> let it re-render up to 3 times, then fail instead of shipping a bad cut
> I leave timestamped notes on each round, Claude Code fixes them and renders again (life saver. because now I know where to pay attention when reviewing the final cut)
The final deliverables:
> a 15-minute cut
> (barely passable) shorts
> 3 thumbnail options
> a YouTube description
It's a work in progress and I need to work on so many deliverable features, but we're getting there inch by inch
What I still want:
> an A/B test on the thumbnails in YouTube Studio
> my newsletter, podcast, and X links added to the description
> so much more output from the one video (i.e., short-form clips, tweet copy, article copy, newsletter copy)
5 rounds in, the agent finally cuts and edits in a way that's 90% there for the long-form
Train your AI agents to become your intern, not your ghost writer
For technical articles, I use two agents to help me craft a deliverable
The first agent is for research. Its job:
> dig through GitHub repositories and past coverage about the product/project
> find coverage talking about the subject matter outside of the usual echo chamber
> hand off a research file written for the next agent to read
The second agent is for drafting. Its job:
> review the document from agent one
> draft an article from only what can be sourced
> write in my tone and style using a skill built from 2,000+ of my past articles
The end result is a document that a well-educated intern would’ve put together
I then edit the deliverable by:
> reformatting
> moving parts of the article around so it makes more sense
> adding human touches to the copy
> linking my related past coverage that’s related to the article
In the end, agents do the heavy lifting, I still do the job
My biggest fear isn't failure itself, but other people thinking I'm a failure
So I'm doing the scary thing… building in public beyond X and working to get better at the whole craft, not just the posting
I'm also starting to use AI (Grok Bots, Claude Code, and ChatGPT) to help edit long-form videos (on various subject-matter), and turn each one into:
> tweets
> articles
> newsletter (BeeHiiv)
> shorts (YouTube, TikTok)
I know what you're thinking, and don't worry, you won't see AI slop on my feed…
AI does the cutting, I still make every call on what ships
Follow along for the follies and the slight victories
DylanΞGra₿owski retweeted
"Now that core is developed, we're shifting focus to the access." - @jchaskin22
Jason says the properties Ethereum guarantees at its core still fail to reach most users, who rely on gatekeepers like RPCs and app frontends.
I asked him how @ethereum brings those properties to every user.
> What is the main gap between how Ethereum is supposed to work and what most people experience?
> Which intermediaries still sit between users and Ethereum, and which can we already remove?
> Which part of a normal user flow forces the largest trust assumption?
What still needs to land before wallets stop defaulting to trusted RPCs?
> Which Ethereum guarantees do builders care most about preserving?
> What change in wallets or dApps would show the gap is closing? If this work succeeds, what would feel different for an ordinary user?
Full Q&A👇
Living Outside the Dollar: Ten Years Unbanked by Choice
@TheDesertLynx closed his bank account in spring 2016 and never reopened it
I hosted him on @SmartEconomyPod's Crypto Coffee & Blockchain Beer X Space last Friday to find out how that works
I got into crypto in 2017 during the ICO craze, and have spent most of the years since covering it as an asset class
Joel, on the other hand, well... he runs his whole financial life on it
That was one of the things I was super interested in digging into with him
Why he left
Joel found Bitcoin around 2012, and now does BD and marketing for @Dashpay
> Sound money drew him in first
> Using BTC changed his priorities
> Sending value with a QR scan, with no permission needed, mattered more to him than inflation resistance
By the end of 2015 he quit his job and started to take work that would only pay him in Bitcoin
Shortly thereafter, a Cointelegraph writing gig came his way and the bank account closed the following spring
In our conversation, he said that Bitcoin fees made daily spending impractical by late 2016
That's when he moved to Dash
(NOTE: I had a similar experience in 2017. High Ethereum fees are why I ended up building in the Neo ecosystem)
Today, Joel still tests Lightning, Monero, and Zcash. But Dash covers about 95% of what he spends
How he spends
The answer to his questions started with a mindset, not looking at digital monies as a tool
Trade is peer to peer, he argued, and using crypto to buy everyday goods can be a lot simpler than we think:
> Menus and card terminals make it feel fixed
> A business owner can still take a custom offer
Though, he conceded that negotiating with a minimum wage cashier is not the smart move; there's only so much they can do
Beyond that, he named three pillars that make spending crypto possible outside of the traditional debit/credit card-based society we're accustomed:
> Bill pay services accept crypto and settle your utility bill
> Prepaid cards let you spend on card rails
> Gift cards let you pre-buy from retailers that do not accept crypto
Privacy is the other layer that crypto advocates usually tout, but we have very little to back us up... Cash is *actually* private but useless online
He named @Zebec_HQ as the one reloadable private card he trusts
Plus, Dash's instant finality lets him load his digital card moments before he's ready to tap-to-pay
The part I can't stop thinking about...
Spending crypto instead of holding it creates a different relationship with fixed-supply digital assets
Joel is the first US-based person I've met that's gone "off-grid" and uses crypto to live outside of the money system that's persisted in the US for so long
I have only seen these tools matter once in person
A friend from China could not use his credit card in Buenos Aires last year
It was @joinpeanut, a crypto payments app, that got him through the week
But Joel has lived that situation daily for a decade, by choice, and honestly, I was impressed to see how well he was able to adapt
Almost as if... we all have a choice about whether to live inside the fiat Matrix
What comes next?
Joel sees in-app spending as the next step
> A wallet scans a merchant QR code and pays directly
He pointed to Aeon, which already does this across Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America
After that, he envisions a world where native acceptance can occur at the point of sale
As for me? I am not ready to close my own bank account
BUT I am more convinced than I was a week ago that the workaround is real
Could you go a year without your bank account?
Crypto won the candidate count last night, but not control of the agenda
The Good
> Pro-crypto candidates outnumber anti-crypto candidates, thank you @standwithcrypto
> There were legit W's for the pro-crypto Dems [Pappas (D) NH]
The Bad
> The SEC and CFTC's regulatory agenda now faces greater congressional scrutiny; Democratic committee chairs can deprioritize crypto legislation
> Not every pro-crypto candidate was running a contested race
> A large number of pro-crypto candidates doesn't mean that crypto bills are a sure shot (i.e., CLARITY Act is still stalled in the Senate with an R majority)
The Ugly
> Crypto PACs lost *badly* in Ohio, Sherrod Brown (former Senate Banking Committee chair) beat ~$63 million in opposition funding
> Expect more inquisitions into Trump's crypto activities than progress on meaningful legislation that will protect consumers (see the incoming oversight chairman's statement)
Ultimately, the hope for long-term crypto legislation in the US lies in rebuilding bipartisan bridges, and separating Trump (or any party) from an agenda
P.S. bitcoin:native is a honey badger and don't care
Anyone who knows your wallet address can see how much money you hold
That's a problem
@zk_money lets you save USDC/USDT/DAI privately, and earn up to 3.8% yield
Your savings shouldn't be everyone's business
Would you use a private savings account?
If you haven't onboarded yet, feel free to use my referral link invite.zk.money/3nwjzfk











