Alexandra Edelman retweeted
New paper published!
Addressing power imbalance in research: exploring power in integrated knowledge translation health research. Great to work with @JacquiCameron18 and Anita Kothari on this one. We are deeply passionate about addressing power in research
doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-0…
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
The Menzies-led NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence for Strengthening Health Systems in Remote Australia (CRESTRA) has been named as a key partner in the new National Multidisciplinary Primary Care Research, Policy and Advocacy Consortium, led by UNSW.
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
🚨Results from the #PERSPECT qualitative study, focused on researcher, funder, patient & public perspectives re: knowledge translation & community engagement in med research, published in health-policy-systems.biomed… @DCNSNeuro Thanks @AdamSmithHouse & @letsgetproof
for funding this!
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
The use of mentoring for knowledge translation by allied health: a scoping review
This @JBI_EI manuscript explores the benefits of mentoring in guiding allied health professionals to better utilise research evidence in their daily practice.
tinyurl.com/5f3zbd4z
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
Our health is dependent on the health of Country – ‘1 week to go until #HEAL2024’
To improve our health and health of future generations, we need to treat our environment with much more care than what we are currently doing, says A/Prof Veronica Matthews, HEAL 2024 Co-Chair
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
Something I see a lot in qualitative research is a lack of analysis. Basically a rundown of what's in the data, but without doing anything with it (analysis). It's the qualitative equivalent of descriptive stats. Short thread.
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
So much of our focus in trying to spread improvements is in "explicit" knowledge: toolkits, good practice databases, standardised pathways etc. Most of the content that AI repurposes from online resources is explicit knowledge.
Yet the biggest opportunities are in "tacit" knowledge: the practical "know-how" rooted in people, their experiences, insights & judgements. Unlocking tacit knowledge is how organisations break past their internal barriers to innovate & improve.
Thanks @tnvora for a striking new version of the explicit/tacit iceberg picture. Tanmay has also written an excellent blog on how to unlock tacit knowledge: qaspire.com/the-iceberg-of-o…
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
How to say no. A superb article: "In a world that often values compliance over authenticity....we find ourselves entangled in a web of obligations, constantly saying yes to requests that may not align with our true desires or priorities. Yet, buried beneath the layers of societal expectations & internalised guilt lies the power to reclaim our autonomy".
This article explains:
- the reasons why we always say yes
- why we should learn to say no
- how to recognise when not to say yes
- tips for learning how to say no
- different (positive) ways of saying no
- how to deal with unwelcome responses
positivepsychology.com/how-t…. By @LauraCopleyLPC. I paired it with a graphic on the same topic by @donnellycss.
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
You've spent months on your research, only to realize you used the wrong method. Ouch. Research methods confuse most people.
I see more boring, unappealing, and standard explanations by the day.
Because it's challenging to understand them all.
It requires many skills. Like:
→ Data analysis
→ Critical thinking
→ Experimental design
→ Statistical interpretation
All part of conducting great research.
Yet, many researchers fail at choosing the right method.
Here are 5 key branches of research methods:
→ Quantitative (numbers-based analysis)
→ Qualitative (exploratory, non-numerical)
→ Mixed Methods (combining both)
→ Experimental (testing cause-effect)
→ Observational (watching without interference)
A good researcher must be able to navigate these methods.
Qualitative methods are crucial for in-depth understanding.
Here's how I would structure a qualitative study:
1. Research question (what you want to explore)
2. Data collection (interviews, observations)
3. Thematic analysis (finding patterns)
4. Interpretation (making sense of findings)
5. Conclusion (addressing the research question)
I'd aim for rich, detailed descriptions in my methodology.
And for as much depth and context as my data allows.
Here are 7 qualitative methods I love:
1. Ethnography
2. Case Study
3. Phenomenology
4. Grounded Theory
5. Content Analysis
6. Action Research
7. Historical Research
Good luck with choosing a research method that doesn't fail.
It's a challenge. I think my methods could improve as well.
Please share your favourite research method in the comments if it helped you publish a paper.
It's helpful to many new researchers to get inspiration.
What do you think makes or breaks a good research methodology?
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
Unfair knowledge practices in global health: a realist synthesis | Health Policy and Planning | Oxford Academic academic.oup.com/heapol/arti…
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
Fantastic new scoping review on local #KnowledgeMobilisation from @HannahDurrant29 & colleagues
'Improving #evidence use: a systematic scoping review of local models of #knowledge mobilisation' by @HannahDurrant29 et al.
#OpenAccess, from @EvidencePolicy's latest issue!
@PolicyUpen @CAPE_acuk @TransformUre @KMbForum @SPRExchange
Read with #OA ⬇️
doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16…
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
New study led by Research Fellow Dr Prabhakar Veginadu reveals turnover among Aboriginal staff in remote health services is half that of non-Aboriginal staff. Read more in today’s media release: bit.ly/3Z2Rt4E
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
We’re proud to see CRESTRA, an @NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence (CRE) join the Collaboration for Enhanced Research Impact (CERI), a joint initiative by @TAPPCentre. Read more bit.ly/4bN8NND #RemoteHealth
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
On Friday 7 June our Research and Translation team will host a Q&A session regarding the application process for our Major Research Grant Round 2024. This will be led by Associate Professor Michelle Kennedy.
Register here: hubs.li/Q02xRT_t0
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
We enjoyed sharing #TuesdayTips this year with great tips & tools on knowledge mobilisation & science communication from the Collaboration for Enhanced Research Impact #CERI User Guide. Catch up on #scicomm insights here bit.ly/3OkSAXw
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
How does the external context affect an implementation processes? A qualitative study investigating the impact of macro-level variables on the implementation of goal-oriented primary care #impsci
implementationscience.biomed…
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
📣 NEWS: The Cultural Safety for Health Professionals Portal on the @HealthInfoNet website has recently undergone a revamp. The Portal provides quick & easy access to cultural safety info for the Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander health sector: 🔗 bit.ly/3gzM7pH
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
Check out our new ‘Working together to share the diabetes in pregnancy story’ video resources by @diabpartnership. Available in English and Torres Strait Creole, the suite of 8 short videos covers the diabetes in pregnancy journey.
Watch it here: diabeteslifecourse.org.au/di…
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
JOIN OUR TEAM | We’re looking for a Strategic Initiatives Manager to help drive positive outcomes for northern Australia. If you have strong skills in communication, project management & stakeholder engagement, apply before Sunday 3 March 2024: bit.ly/3SMBa7k
Alexandra Edelman retweeted
Our first Discussion Paper for 2024 was developed by the Maiam nayri Wingara Indigenous Data Sovereignty Collective and aims to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and organisations to realise Indigenous Data Sovereignty.
Read more: hubs.li/Q02j52qd0
































