ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG) header
ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG) profile picture

Spend all my spare time in the 'Cesspit of Terfery' with all the other 'crackpots' who know men can't be women.

Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined May 2011
Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)Photo by ElleBeeG (@ElleBeeG)
Scotland's Hate Crime Bill deliberately excludes the characteristic of sex. Why are we not protecting the women of Scotland? We will fight this. We will not be silenced. We are watching. Women are #WorthProtecting I am #WorthProtecting #WomenWontWheesht
11
57
4
191
For all those in the women's sector who never gave up.
184
623
73
3,139
255,279
BTW Ms Amy Hamm, Trans women are women and deserve to be cared for as women #TransRightsAreHumanRights
14
ElleBeeG retweeted
You've avoided nearly all of my questions, Norah, because you're literally incapable of answering them. Your mind is firmly closed to any evidence or facts that undermine your preferred narrative. You consider it immoral for anyone to even question you, even though you voluntarily and confidently entered this discussion. You're like a flat-earther. Nothing I or anyone else says to you will permeate your stubborn quasi-religious beliefs, because to change your mind would take away a core part of your self image, which is as somebody who is kinder and better and more righteous than the nasty people still advocating for the safety of women and girls. You repeat your thought-terminating clichés and unevidenced assertions, which I assume sound clever inside your echo chamber, but which, outside it, make you appear not only dim, but a total moral vacuum. Increased risk to females? Who cares. Women threatened by violence? Of course those poor trans-identified men lash out when they meet resistance! What is a gender identity? You can't really say, but like the flat-earther, you're sure it exists, because your tribe is held together by belief in it, and pride themselves on their blind faith in it. I keep waiting for a single gender ideologue or trans activist to truly engage with the facts, but all of you sheer away from them like horses from fireworks. It truly is like talking to cult members who're incapable of engaging in rational debate and just keep chanting the mantras, consigning all serious questions to the 'evil' bin. I've been told I'm on the wrong side of history thousands of times. By debating people like you, I've come to realise that your ilk's idea of the 'right side of history' means stripping women and girls' of their rights, excusing male violence against women, siding with those issuing death and rape threats and attempting to suppress critical thought and freedom of speech. Maybe, like the flat-earthers, you genuinely think history will vindicate you. I believe people will look back on this period and analyse your arguments, not because they admire them, but because they're trying to fathom how so many supposedly intelligent people fell, hook, line and sinker for a bunch of vacuous, post-modern, pseudo-intellectual cobblers, while being completely indifferent to the real world harm they were enabling.
462
2,488
264
17,041
581,724
Are we supposed to pretend the @stonewalluk mantra of #NoDebate never happened?
A lot of us were very willing to have a debate without heat, @stonewalluk, and the reason that never happened wasn't because gender critical feminists didn't want one. While we were trying to get you to listen to our concerns, your former CEO was telling a BBC boss that gay people not wanting to include the opposite sex in their dating pool was 'sexual racism'. While we were pointing out the homophobia inherent in gender ideology, Stonewall ambassador Alex Drummond (a bearded, heterosexual man who'd had no surgery and taken no cross-sex hormones but liked wearing skirts), was going into schools to talk to students about his 'lesbian' identity. @BluskyeAllison, who actually is a lesbian, was subject to unlawful discrimination at her place of work for tweeting: ‘Stonewall recently hired Morgan Page, a male bodied person who ran workshops with the sole aim of coaching heterosexual men who identify as lesbians on how they can coerce young lesbians into having sex with them. Page called [it] “overcoming the cotton ceiling”.’ When the UK Supreme Court upheld women's right to single sex spaces, you issued a statement expressing your unhappiness about the ruling. In her report on your unhappy influence at the University of Essex, you were found by barrister @akuareindorf to have misrepresented the law as it related to women's rights: '[Stonewall have] stated the law as Stonewall would prefer it to be, rather than the law as it is’. In 2018, you publicly advised schools to shred a research pack saying there were risks to puberty blockers, in spite of the fact that you aren't a medical charity and that there was already credible evidence that puberty blockers are neither irreversible nor harm-free. Meanwhile you produced your own educational packs, recommending a children's book, for ages 5-9, in which the parent 'is neither a man, nor a woman – they’re non-binary.' In July 2022, Stonewall sent out a tweet that read ‘Research suggests that children as young as two recognise their trans identity'. @thetimes has reported how you've sought to control the language used by NHS trusts and government on their social-media accounts. Organisations would get points from you for replacing commonly understood words with ideologically approved terms, eg, 'birthing parent' instead of 'mother'. thetimes.com/uk/society/arti… In short, you took a maximalist position on gender identity ideology, which you attempted to enforce by diktat. You refused to acknowledge that you'd hitched your wagon to a cause that, unlike civil rights, gay rights or women's rights, sought to strip rights from others. You sought to curtail everyone's right to freedom of speech and belief by controlling what it was permissible to think and say, through the management and political class. You have argued against women's and girl's rights to their own spaces, their sports and to assemble without men. Your former CEO tried to shame gay women/men into dating the opposite sex if the latter claimed to be female/male. Your mantra was 'no debate' because, like all totalitarians, you preferred slogans, bullying and infiltration of powerful institutions to talking to opponents. You appear to have had no concern for the lowly people your ideology was harming: gender confused kids, female rape victims, female prisoners, regular people hounded and investigated at their places of work for refusing to accept the new mandates on sex and gender issued from on high. Your 'activism' has been a disaster for those trans-identified people who really do just want to get on with their lives in peace. You have besmirched the name of an organisation many of us were once proud to donate to, the charity that was partly responsible for securing the legal right of gay people to marry, which a lot of us thought would never happen in our lifetimes. The milquetoast words quoted below do not erase a decade of gender activism that has been disastrous not only for individuals but for society as a whole. There was once a debate to be had, but until you acknowledge the direct harm you've caused, it is no more possible to debate you than to persuade a person in the throes of a drug-induced psychosis that they are not, in fact, the reincarnated Christ.
1
7
121
The truth.
A lot of us were very willing to have a debate without heat, @stonewalluk, and the reason that never happened wasn't because gender critical feminists didn't want one. While we were trying to get you to listen to our concerns, your former CEO was telling a BBC boss that gay people not wanting to include the opposite sex in their dating pool was 'sexual racism'. While we were pointing out the homophobia inherent in gender ideology, Stonewall ambassador Alex Drummond (a bearded, heterosexual man who'd had no surgery and taken no cross-sex hormones but liked wearing skirts), was going into schools to talk to students about his 'lesbian' identity. @BluskyeAllison, who actually is a lesbian, was subject to unlawful discrimination at her place of work for tweeting: ‘Stonewall recently hired Morgan Page, a male bodied person who ran workshops with the sole aim of coaching heterosexual men who identify as lesbians on how they can coerce young lesbians into having sex with them. Page called [it] “overcoming the cotton ceiling”.’ When the UK Supreme Court upheld women's right to single sex spaces, you issued a statement expressing your unhappiness about the ruling. In her report on your unhappy influence at the University of Essex, you were found by barrister @akuareindorf to have misrepresented the law as it related to women's rights: '[Stonewall have] stated the law as Stonewall would prefer it to be, rather than the law as it is’. In 2018, you publicly advised schools to shred a research pack saying there were risks to puberty blockers, in spite of the fact that you aren't a medical charity and that there was already credible evidence that puberty blockers are neither irreversible nor harm-free. Meanwhile you produced your own educational packs, recommending a children's book, for ages 5-9, in which the parent 'is neither a man, nor a woman – they’re non-binary.' In July 2022, Stonewall sent out a tweet that read ‘Research suggests that children as young as two recognise their trans identity'. @thetimes has reported how you've sought to control the language used by NHS trusts and government on their social-media accounts. Organisations would get points from you for replacing commonly understood words with ideologically approved terms, eg, 'birthing parent' instead of 'mother'. thetimes.com/uk/society/arti… In short, you took a maximalist position on gender identity ideology, which you attempted to enforce by diktat. You refused to acknowledge that you'd hitched your wagon to a cause that, unlike civil rights, gay rights or women's rights, sought to strip rights from others. You sought to curtail everyone's right to freedom of speech and belief by controlling what it was permissible to think and say, through the management and political class. You have argued against women's and girl's rights to their own spaces, their sports and to assemble without men. Your former CEO tried to shame gay women/men into dating the opposite sex if the latter claimed to be female/male. Your mantra was 'no debate' because, like all totalitarians, you preferred slogans, bullying and infiltration of powerful institutions to talking to opponents. You appear to have had no concern for the lowly people your ideology was harming: gender confused kids, female rape victims, female prisoners, regular people hounded and investigated at their places of work for refusing to accept the new mandates on sex and gender issued from on high. Your 'activism' has been a disaster for those trans-identified people who really do just want to get on with their lives in peace. You have besmirched the name of an organisation many of us were once proud to donate to, the charity that was partly responsible for securing the legal right of gay people to marry, which a lot of us thought would never happen in our lifetimes. The milquetoast words quoted below do not erase a decade of gender activism that has been disastrous not only for individuals but for society as a whole. There was once a debate to be had, but until you acknowledge the direct harm you've caused, it is no more possible to debate you than to persuade a person in the throes of a drug-induced psychosis that they are not, in fact, the reincarnated Christ.
1
3
71
If you’re worried about men pretending to be women in bathrooms, you fear MEN. NOT trans women. Unpack that.
1
38
That’s why we have categories - weight classes, age groups, and separate competitions for males and females. Those categories don’t guarantee everyone wins. They give people a meaningful chance to compete.
96
101
14
996
58,570
BREAKING: Robert Jefferson Tulley, the man who attacked @UofUGOP students on Tuesday, is a ROBLOX game developer at @gamefamstudios, per @MrAndyNgo. Roblox is well-known for being a popular destination for child predators.
185
996
44
3,913
75,351
ElleBeeG retweeted
Ngo investigates: I've been able to find out the real identity of the trans violent extremist accused of attacking a @uofutah conservative student after wishing for mass deadly violence. "Amber Grace" is the alias of Robert Jefferson Tulley. He's a Roblox game developer who has worked on many children's gaming projects. He works at @gamefamstudios in Salt Lake City. ngocomment.com
“I think Republicans should be shot in the street.” Video recorded at @uofutah captured an alleged attack by a far-left trans militant who uses the name “Amber Grace.” The victim was a College Republicans member. The trans person, a man, is facing charges of assault and property damage. Far-left groups immediately said that “Amber” was the victim of the attack by being recorded and that he shouldn’t face any legal accountability. The chilling call to leftist violence from the trans militant follows a pro-trans gunman allegedly assassinating Charlie Kirk on an Utah campus.
719
7,595
351
19,445
304,022
No matter the cosmetic surgeries, the synthetic cross sex hormones, the make-up, the hair, the clothes... agressive violent men will always be aggressive violent men. And they're especially aggressive violent men when women say no.
“I think Republicans should be shot in the street.” Video recorded at @uofutah captured an alleged attack by a far-left trans militant who uses the name “Amber Grace.” The victim was a College Republicans member. The trans person, a man, is facing charges of assault and property damage. Far-left groups immediately said that “Amber” was the victim of the attack by being recorded and that he shouldn’t face any legal accountability. The chilling call to leftist violence from the trans militant follows a pro-trans gunman allegedly assassinating Charlie Kirk on an Utah campus.
1
1
87
ElleBeeG retweeted
Highlight reel of Australia’s sex discrimination commissioner, the custodian of women’s rights, saying utter nonsense. It could on for hours but we’ve all got lives to lead so here’s 3 minutes.
510
1,158
168
4,770
176,209
This apology from disability charity Scope, for cancelling my choir’s London Marathon performance because of my gender-critical views, is required to stay on its website for seven days. Today is Day 6. Women don’t always get the apologies they deserve. So I’d be grateful if you could help make sure this one is seen by sharing it over the next 24 hours (link below). 🙏 Thanks again to @SpeechUnion for supporting my legal case and helping secure this apology.
58
1,603
29
3,652
61,407
So this chap who wants to ‘give transphobes a fright’ at Halloween parkruns has been emailing parkrun event teams to promote his campaign. He opens by asserting that @sharrond62 and @wsusportsunion are ‘sueing parkrun because they want to make the event less inclusive.’ That is incorrect. What they want - as do many others - is for parkrun to stop allowing males to run in the female category. He also asks event teams to add his new club to their club affiliations and promote it on their socials! Meanwhile, he’s actively trying to drum up support in Facebook and Reddit groups - based on false information. And is now started to gain some traction. I like to think no event teams would be silly enough to get involved. But I’ve met event directors - and other volunteers - who have been totally ‘captured’ by gender ideology. Some think running Pride-themed events and flying the ‘Progress Pride’ flag is perfectly acceptable, seemingly unaware - or unconcerned - that it represents contested political and ideological positions that may make some participants deeply uncomfortable. This new group has apparently been set up in ‘opposition’ to @RRRunnersUK whose members peacefully protest parkrun’s policy by turning up in club T-shirts to run, walk or volunteer. Their rules explicitly state that they won’t approach anyone or discuss the club unless asked. Contrast this with a group putting out what I personally feel is a rather ‘menacing’ statement about giving ‘transphobes a fright’ at Halloween parkruns. And let’s be honest … they’re talking about women. Because it’s predominantly women campaigning for fairness in women’s sport. I’ve seen how hostile some trans activists can be towards women who challenge gender ideology. So I genuinely worry this could put women at risk - and cause disruption at events. I sincerely hope parkrun will intervene. For me, this crosses the line between peaceful protest and political campaigning. I love parkrun. I’ve been involved for 13 years and currently give up around 20 hours a month volunteering for an organisation which has a policy I believe discriminates against women. But if this isn’t dealt with appropriately, I’ll be seriously considering whether I can continue to volunteer my time as an event director.
25
125
4
535
21,542
It’s kinda crazy that we’ve literally studied the trans women in sports thing, the scientific consensus is that after a few years of HRT there is no significant advantage. And yet that doesn’t matter even a little bit and we still have to hear morons babble about this constantly.
1
79
‘Weak leadership combined with ideological capture, perceived prestige for the organisation, and fear had all led to children being harmed.’ Gender ideology has spread like wildfire through the NHS. The casualties: kids and whistleblowers. Free to read. thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/a…
305
2,442
27
13,723
347,921
ElleBeeG retweeted
Very proud to be part of this documentary about the absolute madness of transgender ideology in Australia. So many harrowing stories told by brave people who simply refused to go along with an obvious lie. Everyone needs to know what is really going on:
74
1,340
42
5,728
57,993
ElleBeeG retweeted
Australia’s sex discrimination commissioner has confirmed in senate estimates that men who claim to be women are covered by breastfeeding protections in the sex discrimination act.
764
834
245
3,520
472,897
ElleBeeG retweeted
A female patient requested a female doctor and a male claiming to be female turned up. If a doctor will ignore something so relevant as biological sex, what else will be ignored? It calls everything into question. But this is what happens when ideology is prioritized over reality.
161
1,127
30
6,639
73,715
When I started @xx_xyathletics 2 1/2 years ago, I could never have predicted that people would respond this way. I just wanted to provide a brand that actually stands up for women instead of the pretend nonsense Nike and all the others do. I'm still stunned every single day that a statement of fact -- there are two sexes (therefore women deserve their own sports & spaces) -- produces this kind of mob rage. It's truly deranged.
This is what happens in Portland OR if you wear @xx_xyathletics to an @NWSL @ThornsFC game.
653
2,340
96
11,514
139,805
Oh what a surprise ... Dr Beth Upton - the male doctor at the centre of nurse Sandie Peggie’s tribunal case over using a female changing room at NHS Fife - isn't exactly keeping a low profile after his move to Australia. The Scottish Mail on Sunday reports that Upton - now known as Lis - reportedly became involved in an incident at Port Macquarie Base Hospital ... After a female patient declined treatment from him and requested a female doctor. Link below 👇
188
741
65
3,471
168,638