Usman retweeted
Quick update from the workshop ๐ ๏ธ
Still heads-down on the third Dustmote game. Itโs a survival adventure across 8 new maps, starting in the living room and ending on the moon. Every map gets its own little problems and surprises, and Iโm trying to get the feel right before showing more.
Alongside that, new character sprites are in the works. Tassel, Lint Bug, Crumb Crab, Sock Gremlin and a Rug Pirate are all joining the world.
WEBTOON episodes are rolling out too, so if you havenโt read Season 1 yet, itโs free and a good way to meet the whole crew.
None of this would be happening without the community. Thank you for playing, sharing your scores and cheering for a tiny speck with a big dream. ๐
Also, the community contest wraps up tomorrow at 8 PM ET. Memes, fan art, high scores and being kind to new members all count. Come say hi ๐
TG: t.me/+aWX7PTiZBfhkNGMx
Usman retweeted
Another project worth keeping on your radar!
$MOTE (DustmoteCoin) is growing with a strong community, creative memes, and plenty of energy.
Come check us out and see what weโre building
TG : t.me/+aWX7PTiZBfhkNGMx
X : nitter.gq/dustmotecoin?s=11
#MOTE #DustmoteCoin #Solana #Meme
Usman retweeted
๐ง๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฆ-๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐๐ง ๐๐ฆ ๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐๐๐ข๐ช๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐.
Adding another chain is relatively easy to announce.
Building an economic connection between multiple chains is a different challenge.
This is one reason the HyperEVM expansion of @RebateLaunch caught my attention.
Rebate Pad is taking its buyer bonus and automatic holder payout model beyond Robinhood Chain, while keeping $REBATE native to its original network.
Rather than introducing another version of the token on HyperEVM, platform fees generated there are designed to flow back into the existing $REBATE buyback and burn mechanism.
This creates an interesting distinction:
More chains do not necessarily need to mean more token versions.
Instead, different networks can contribute to one shared token economy.
I think this is a more meaningful way to approach expansion because it connects ecosystem growth with a common economic mechanism.
However, the real question remains:
Can activity on multiple chains generate enough sustainable revenue to make the buyback and burn meaningful over time?
That is what I would monitor beyond launch announcements and early volume.
Rebate Pad has an interesting architecture.
Now execution and sustained adoption have to do the talking.
Usman retweeted
๐ข๐ก๐ ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ก. ๐ ๐จ๐๐ง๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ฆ. ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ก๐ข๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ข๐ฃ.
Cross-chain expansion usually introduces a difficult question for token ecosystems:
How do you expand to new networks without fragmenting the value of your native token?
This is where the approach behind @RebateLaunch deserves attention.
With Rebate Pad expanding from Robinhood Chain to HyperEVM, the interesting part isn't just bringing its launchpad mechanics to another network.
It's how the economics are connected.
The design maintains one $REBATE token on Robinhood Chain while routing platform fees generated across supported chains back into its buyback and burn mechanism.
That creates three important layers:
โข Multi-chain distribution: Projects and users can access the launchpad across different ecosystems.
โข Unified token economics: Expansion does not require creating a separate $REBATE token on every chain.
โข Connected value capture: Platform activity across networks contributes to the same token supply reduction mechanism.
There is a meaningful difference between expanding a product across chains and expanding its economic activity.
The first brings more users.
The second creates a connection between that growth and the underlying token.
Of course, the model still needs sustained usage, reliable cross-chain infrastructure and meaningful volume to prove its long-term value.
But this is the part of Rebate Pad I find worth watching.
Cross-chain growth is more interesting when the economics remain connected.
Usman retweeted
Not all trading volume tells the same story.
When evaluating a launch on @RebateLaunch, I wouldn't look at volume alone. I'd want to understand what is actually driving that activity.
Consider four indicators:
1. Unique participants: Is activity coming from a broad group of wallets or just a handful of addresses?
2. Buy-and-sell balance: Is there meaningful two-sided trading or mostly one-directional activity?
3. Liquidity depth: Can the pool handle larger trades without excessive price impact?
4. Actual holder payouts: Is trading activity translating into verifiable distributions in the pair asset?
Why does this matter for robinhood:0xb7ff57631b97000d950236ef63bd463da5beba7e?
Rebate Pad's holder reward model is linked to trading activity. That means the quality and sustainability of that activity deserve attention, not just the headline volume.
A pool can record impressive numbers without necessarily creating durable demand or a healthy market.
My view: measure the participants, liquidity and distributions behind the volume. That's a much better way to evaluate whether a launch ecosystem is developing sustainably.
@starlisting #RebateLaunch
Usman retweeted
๐ข๐ป๐ฒ ๐ง๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป. ๐ ๐๐น๐๐ถ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐. ๐ข๐ป๐ฒ ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ.
One detail about @RebateLaunch that deserves more attention is how it approaches cross-chain expansion.
With Rebate Pad arriving on HyperEVM, the interesting part isn't simply adding another network.
It's how the economics remain connected.
Most multi-chain ecosystems eventually face a difficult choice: deploy separate tokens, fragment liquidity, or distribute value across disconnected environments.
RebateLaunch is taking a different approach.
โข Rebate Pad operates across multiple chains.
โข Buyers receive bonuses on qualifying purchases.
โข Holders earn automatic payouts from trading activity.
โข Platform fees generated across supported chains flow back toward buying and burning the same $REBATE token on Robinhood Chain.
That last mechanism is particularly interesting.
Instead of creating a separate native token for every expansion, the system aims to connect growth across different networks to one shared token economy.
However, architecture alone doesn't guarantee sustainability.
The real test will be whether cross-chain adoption generates consistent organic trading activity and meaningful fee revenue over time.
For me, that's the metric worth watching.
Expansion creates reach. Sustainable activity creates economic value.
That's what makes the next phase of @RebateLaunch worth following.
Powered by @starlisting
Usman retweeted
A token can look liquid on the buy side and still be difficult to exit.
That's one reason I think evaluating a Rebate Pad launch should go beyond the headline liquidity figure.
For any $REBATE ecosystem launch, I would examine three things:
1. Buy-side depth: How much can someone buy before price impact becomes significant?
2. Sell-side depth: Can holders exit meaningful positions without taking disproportionate losses?
3. Liquidity concentration: Is liquidity distributed across useful price levels, or concentrated in a narrow range?
The bonus tokens on every buy may improve the quantity received, but they don't eliminate slippage or guarantee an attractive exit.
This distinction matters because a launchpad should be evaluated from both sides of the transaction.
Rebate Pad's direct-to-Uniswap pool approach makes pool quality especially important from the beginning.
My takeaway: don't just ask how many tokens a buyer receives. Ask what the market can realistically absorb when that buyer wants to sell.
@RebateLaunch @starlisting #RebateLaunch
Usman retweeted
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ ๐บ๐๐น๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ท๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐๐ผ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ.
Cross-chain expansion is easy to announce.
Building an economic connection between those chains is much harder.
This is where @RebateLaunch has an interesting design choice.
As Rebate Pad expands from Robinhood Chain to HyperEVM, it isn't introducing another version of $REBATE.
The platform intends to route fees generated across supported networks back to Robinhood Chain, where they contribute to buying and burning the existing $REBATE token.
This creates an interesting relationship between expansion and token economics.
More supported networks could mean more participants.
More genuine trading activity could generate more platform fees.
And more fee revenue could support the existing buyback and burn mechanism.
But there's an important distinction:
More chains don't automatically mean more users, and more transactions don't automatically mean sustainable demand.
The model still needs consistent adoption, real liquidity, and organic trading volume.
I think that's the more important conversation around RebateLaunch right now.
Not just how many chains it can reach, but how effectively it connects their activity into one economic system.
Growth is impressive. Connected growth is more interesting.
Usman retweeted
๐
๐ง๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ง ๐ ๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ง. ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐ฅ.
Every new day in crypto brings another wave of opportunities, fresh market movements, unexpected price changes, and opinions coming from every direction.
One moment, a token is trending. The next, everyone is talking about a different opportunity. Social media fills with predictions, charts start moving, and the pressure to act quickly becomes difficult to ignore.
But here's something every crypto participant should understand: being quick doesn't always mean being right.
The difference between making a thoughtful decision and following the crowd often comes down to preparation.
Before entering a trade, understand what you're buying. Look beyond the excitement surrounding a project. Study its fundamentals, consider the risks, understand market conditions, and have a clear reason for your decision.
And just as importantly, learn to manage your emotions.
Fear of missing out can make people enter positions without proper research. Excitement can make them overlook warning signs. Even experienced traders can make poor decisions when they allow market pressure to take control.
That's why continuous learning matters.
Crypto is not simply about finding the next coin that might move. It's also about developing the knowledge, discipline, and awareness needed to navigate an unpredictable market.
This is the mindset behind my journey with @ulanbit.
As I continue exploring the platform and learning more about the trading experience, I'm reminded that having access to trading tools is only one part of the equation. Knowing how to use them responsibly is equally important.
Whether you're exploring Spot Trading, learning about market movements, or discovering different opportunities within the crypto space, take the time to understand what you're doing.
Don't let every notification dictate your next move. Don't confuse market excitement with a solid strategy. And never forget that managing risk is part of becoming a better trader.
The goal should not be to participate in every market movement. The goal should be to become more informed with every decision.
If you're ready to explore the platform and continue your trading journey, visit:
๐ ulanbit.com
ULANBIT, Trade. Earn. Grow. ๐
A new day brings new opportunities, but the smartest advantage you can develop is knowledge.
What's one trading habit you believe every crypto beginner should develop before entering the market? ๐
#ULANBIT #CryptoTrading #TradingEducation #Web3
Usman retweeted
Front-end attacks like these are why Rebate Pad runs with no third-party scripts, no analytics, no WalletConnect, and never asks for an off-chain signature.
Every action you sign is an on-chain transaction you can read before you confirm.
Rebate Pad = Safeโ
Vibe-coded Launchpads = At Risk โ
๐จ Community Alert: Our system has detected a potential frontend attack targeting @flapdotsh and @Kintsu:
โข flap[.]sh
โข kintsu[.]xyz
Please refrain from signing transactions and avoid interactions with these dApps until the issue is resolved.
Usman retweeted
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐
๐๐! ๐
๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฃ๐๐ก๐ฆ ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐ ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ก?
That's a question worth exploring when looking at @RebateLaunch.
Rebate Pad is built around more than the initial purchase. Its model connects three parts of participation:
Buy: Eligible purchases through the Rebate main pool can receive additional bonus tokens.
Hold: Qualifying holders can receive automatic USDG rewards from trading fees, without staking or manual claims.
Platform activity: A portion of platform fees is used to buy and burn $REBATE, according to the project's stated mechanism.
There are also important details to understand, including the stated 1 billion maximum supply, burned launch liquidity, and contract renunciation.
But knowing these features exist is only the beginning. Buyers should understand which trading routes qualify for bonuses, how reward eligibility works, and what risks remain.
Bonuses do not guarantee profits. Rewards depend on activity, and market prices can still move in either direction.
What interests me is the idea of connecting the buying experience with holding incentives and wider platform activity.
The real test will be transparent execution over time.
Enjoy your evening, everyone. โค๏ธ
@RebateLaunch @Starlisting $REBATE
Usman retweeted
Going cross chain.
The pad is built and running on a fork of the next chain. Bridge tested.
Burn tested.
And now stress testing.
One $REBATE token will exist and that's on Robinhood chain; all cross-chain networks will relay revenue to Robinhood to automatically buy and burn Rebate tokens.
Squint all you like, we're not saying yet.
Usman retweeted
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐
๐๐! โค๏ธโ๐ฉน
๐ง๐ฅ๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ฆ ๐ก๐ข๐ง ๐๐จ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฆ. ๐๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ช๐ฆ ๐ช๐๐๐ก ๐ฃ๐๐ข๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ.
One thing I believe every token launchpad should take seriously is what happens after a token goes live.
Who still has control over the contract? Can the rules be changed? What happens to the liquidity? And can buyers inspect the details themselves?
These are questions worth asking before getting carried away by a promising launch.
@RebateLaunch has made contract transparency and renunciation part of its approach to Rebate Pad. Removing certain creator permissions can reduce the ability to change contract rules after deployment, but it does not eliminate every risk.
That distinction matters.
A renounced contract does not guarantee a successful project, healthy liquidity, or safe participation. Research still comes first.
I also believe project discovery should be easier. Users need clear information about a token's mechanics, permissions, and risks before deciding whether to participate.
Making launches simple is valuable. Making them easier to understand is just as important.
Let's build a culture where people do more than chase incentives. Let's encourage them to ask questions, verify details, and make informed decisions.
@RebateLaunch @Starlisting $REBATE
Usman retweeted
Verification and visibility matter in Web3. ๐
Having $REBATE's source code, logo, links, and project information available on Blockscout gives users another way to research the token directly on Robinhood Chain.
That's an important step toward transparency. People should be able to inspect what they're interacting with instead of relying only on promotional posts.
Still, verification is a starting point, not a guarantee of safety. Always review the contract and understand the risks before making a decision.
More transparency, better-informed users.
@RebateLaunch @Starlisting $REBATE
$REBATE is now fully verified on Blockscout โ
Source code, logo, links and project info all live on Robinhood Chain's explorer. Paste the address, see exactly what you're holding.
0xb7Ff57631B97000d950236ef63bD463da5bEBA7e
Usman retweeted
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐! โ๏ธ
๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐ ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ก ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ข๐จ๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐ ๐ฆ๐ช๐๐ฃ?
That's the idea behind @RebateLaunch and its Rebate Pad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain.
Instead of focusing only on token launches and trading, Rebate Pad introduces incentives into the experience:
โ Eligible buys come with bonus tokens.
โ Qualifying holders can receive USDG payouts directly to their wallets.
โ The project states that launch liquidity is burned as part of its launch mechanism.
What makes this approach interesting is the connection between buying, holding, and the wider platform.
But let's keep one thing clear: incentives do not automatically create demand. A token still needs healthy liquidity, genuine interest, transparent rules, and consistent execution.
The real test is how these mechanics perform beyond the announcement and across different launches.
I'm interested in seeing how Rebate Pad develops and what its growing ecosystem can deliver.
A good incentive model should be easy to understand, transparent to verify, and useful in practice.
@RebateLaunch @Starlisting $REBATE
Usman retweeted
SUSTAINABILITY.
The question on everyone's mind.
Where do the bonus tokens come from? Can the treasury run out?
We get this every day, so here is the full answer, with the numbers on chain.
The treasury can never come up short, and the contract is built that way. ๐งต
Usman retweeted
Episode 01: Pangea.
Same chain, same Uniswap v4, opposite philosophy.
They optimise for where a coin can be bought.
We optimise for why anyone would buy it.
Bonus tokens on every buy. Holder payouts. Liquidity 100% burned.
Holders come first, everything else follows.
Full fact table ๐ Who's next?
Usman retweeted
๐Rebate Pad x @Uniswap
Our hook has been approved and is now on Uniswap's routing allowlist.
Every token launched on the pad can be traded straight from the Uniswap app on Robinhood Chain, bonus tokens included.
Uniswap's routing API now sends the trades through our rebate pool.
