Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros) header
Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros) profile picture

Co-Founder https://nitter.gq/t.co/KwXjxubObe Advisory Board Cleveland State University Computer Eng. #IIoT #AI #ML #CxO #IndustrialTransformation #ICSCybersecurity #AR

United States
Joined January 2009
Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)Photo by Lucian Fogoros (@fogoros)
Tag naming is among the first casualties when AI scales beyond one factory. The probability that sensors carry consistent identifiers across 20 sites is low. Partner content with @InfluxDB. #influxdata_iiot Note: Video generated by AI.
2
3
319
Traditional historians designed for single-site visibility lack the architecture to feed real-time data across a factory network for AI inference and prediction, a gap that only becomes visible when a manufacturer attempts to replicate a working single-site model at enterprise scale.
1
3
27
Manual fixes for edge cases become scaling liabilities when replicated across multiple sites, which is why data architecture must enforce consistency at the foundation rather than through ongoing manual correction.
1
22
Merck treats AI agents the same way it treats human employees on documentation: both can produce different outputs when prompted again, but both must leave behind a defensible record at the time of the original decision. An AI that cannot do this fails the same standard a human employee would fail. Partner content with Adlib. #adlib_iiot
1
2
227
The AI notebook concept captures prompt history, retrieval provenance, and model version at decision time. Without that snapshot, any explanation produced later is a new inference, not a record, and ALCOA's Contemporaneous requirement treats the two very differently.
1
24
ALCOA's five criteria, Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, and Accurate, were designed for human records. Applying them to AI-generated decisions requires agents to be architected differently from the ground up, not retrofitted with logging after deployment.
20
At a plastics factory, connecting machines and having statistical process control running took just one week after deploying a Unified Namespace architecture. Partner content with @HighbyteInc. #highbyte_iiot Note: Video generated by AI.
2
2
1
392
Implementation timelines vary based on each facility's existing processes, systems, and documentation. Much of the work involves understanding how equipment and processes operate and organizing that information so data is actually useful to applications.
1
20
In 2021, the experience gap between teams just beginning to build an industrial data foundation and those leading the way could have been years. Today, as more organizations share what they learned, that gap has narrowed to months.
20
AI could create extraordinary wealth. But telling a generation that abundance is coming while they can’t afford a home or start a family is how you lose their trust. I’m incredibly optimistic about what we can build. People need a meaningful stake in it.
52
54
13
415
23,667
Applying HAZOP guidewords more, less, none, reverse, late, other than to every AI action in OT reframes how risk is assessed. Partner content with @skkynetinc. #skkynet_ai #everline_ai
1
2
7
376
Gary Tillery of Skkynet notes that AI-native companies are at the forefront of managing organizations with both human and digital employees, and the broader industry can learn from how they are approaching this operating model rather than waiting for an HR-style policy to fill the gap.
1
1
2
26
Tillery's model requires domain teams to maintain an evaluation suite that continuously defines whether an agent is still doing its job. Without that ongoing eval, a model upgrade can silently shift agent behavior and no one in the organization has a mechanism to detect the change.
1
1
2
27
Model accuracy is the wrong metric to bring to a VP of operations because it describes how the algorithm performs, when leadership needs to know how the operation performs. Three better metrics: mean time to explanation, trust-adjusted risk, and adoption rate, all baselined before AI is introduced.
3
1
5
369
Trust-adjusted risk assigns a dollar value to the outcome if the AI is wrong, including reputation damage, supply chain disruption, regulatory consequences, and legal exposure. Presenting this figure forces leadership to quantify what they are risking by following or ignoring the AI output.
1
1
30
Adoption rate tracks the percentage of AI recommendations that operators actually act on. A high-accuracy model with a low adoption rate signals a trust gap that no technical improvement will close, making adoption rate a more honest measure of AI value than any model performance score.
1
32