مسلم retweeted
Likewise Shaykh Ahmad Musa Jibril (حفظه الله) calls it Shirk.
He also mentioned another important matter, which is the issue of voting in Mayor/Council elections.
"My Lord, for the favor You have bestowed upon me, I will never be a supporter of the criminals" - (Al-Qasas 17)
مسلم retweeted
Taking Laws from other than Prophets is greatest form of Shirk
Imām Ibn Ḥazm (رحمه الله) said:
“Thus, if they (Christians) deny the existence of prophethood after him (Jesus, peace be upon him), while Laws can only be received from the Prophets (peace be upon them)—for otherwise, whoever legislates them independently of the Prophets (peace be upon them) would be setting himself up as a judge over Allah Most High, and this is among the gravest forms of associating partners with Allah (shirk), falsehood and absurdity—then their laws, which is their Deen are not derived from any Prophet whatsoever.”
📕 Al-Fiṣal fī al-Milal wa-l-Ahwāʾ wa-l-Niḥal 1/130
مسلم retweeted
The esteemed Allamah and Hafidh, Shaykh Nasir al-Fahd who has been imprisoned in a Al-Ha’ir prison for many years. His son, Musʿab ibn Nasir al-Fahd, describes the abuses inflicted upon his father, saying:
“I used to hear about the torture that takes place in prisons and thought it consisted of the usual forms of abuse, such as ordinary beatings, restrictions, being suspended, and similar things, until I learned of what I am now telling you.
Masked officers of the Emergency Forces entered the cell of my father, Nasir al-Fahd, and beat him. They then pinned him to the ground, bound his hands behind his back with a chain, and shackled his feet with two chains. They dragged him through the corridors on his back, pulling him by his hands. They then threw him face down, and one of them placed his foot on his head (may Allah sever it!). They unfastened his restraints, bound him again as shown in the picture, and left.
He (Shaykh Nasir al-Fahd) then summoned his strength and kept trying until he managed to free his right hand from its restraint. As for his left hand, he could not free it because it was paralyzed (may Allah paralyze their hands!). They returned during the night and loosened his restraints. His hand remained paralyzed for an entire month, and to this day, there is still numbness in the thumb of his left hand.
Another thing they did to him was make him sit on an extremely hot plate for four hours! He became severely ill as a result. He could not perform the prayer except through gestures, nor could he go to (the restroom) except by crawling on his stomach. And they did not treat him until after he had stopped eating for five days (this was not a hunger strike, but rather due to his incapacity!!).
They summoned him again recently and asked him to write an apology!! He refused to write anything, not even a signature.
And we have still not seen him or heard his voice for six years!!!”
End of Mus‘ab bin Nasir al-Fahd statement.
To those who continue to defend the rulers, ask yourselves: Is it really worth defending those who treat the scholars in this manner, especially when this is only one of the many cases we have heard about? Is it worth defending those who have fallen into not just one, but multiple nullifiers of the Din?
At what point will people set aside partisanship and loyalty to individuals and give precedence to the Qur’an and Sunnah?
May Allah Almighty keep Shaykh Nasir al-Fahd steadfast, make his suffering a means of elevating his rank, and grant deliverance to all oppressed Muslims. #FreeTheAseer
مسلم retweeted
Shaykh ʿAbd al-Laṭīf Āl al-Shaykh’s Position on Ḥākimiyyah
I have seen Madkhali Nusayri Murtaddeen attributing their Pagan religion to this noble Imam.
As Allah, ʿAzza wa-Jall, says:
“Indeed, the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are the deaf and dumb who do not use reason.” (Qur’an 8:22)
“Had Allah known any good in them, He would have made them hear. And even if He had made them hear, they would still have turned away, refusing.” (Qur’an 8:23)
1. Tākfir of one who does Istibdal of Shari‘ah
Shaykh Abdūl-Latif Al-Shaykh said:
“So examine the reports of those who came before them.
They abandoned the Book and replaced it (Istabdalū).
And they replaced their ways because of their deviation (Istabdalū).
And likewise, they replaced the glorification of our Lord, Glorified be He, with insults (Istabdalū).
What did they see in the leaders of disbelief?
They replaced the divine law with that tyrannical law (Istabdalū).
They replaced the teachings with legislation from Satan (Istabdalū).
They replaced the worship of the Most Merciful with ignorance and the setting up of rivals to Him (Istabdalū).
They replaced His rulings in people's minds (Istabdalū).
And they replaced faith with disbelief (Istabdalū).
They accepted the rule of a state that opposed them.
And they replaced His revelation with laws that contradicted it (Istabdalū).”
2. Takfir of one who seeks Judgement (Tahakkūm) from other than Shari‘ah
Shaykh ʿAbd al-Laṭīf ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān was also asked:
“What is the ruling regarding the people of the sawālif (traditional customs) among the Bedouins and others, who judge according to the customs of their fathers and forefathers? Are they declared disbelievers on that basis after the clarification has been made, and so on?”
He replied:
“Whoever seeks Judgement from other than the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger, after the clarification has been given (that his customs oppose Shari‘ah), is a Kafir.
Allah, the Most High, said:
‘And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, then it is those who are the disbelievers.’ (Al-Mā’idah 5:44)
And Allah, the Most High, said:
‘So is it other than the religion of Allah that they seek?’ (Āl ʿImrān 3:83)
And Allah, the Most High, said:
‘Have you not seen those who claim that they have believed in what was revealed to you and what was revealed before you? They wish to seek judgment of Ṭāghūt, while they were commanded to reject it…’ (An-Nisāʾ 4:60)
And Allah, the Most High, said:
‘And We certainly sent into every nation a messenger saying, “Worship Allah and avoid Ṭāghūt.”’ (An-Naḥl 16:36)
And there are many verses conveying this meaning.”
3. Takfir of one who attends Parliement and Legislative Councils
“Among the greatest of sins and misguidance that nullify the asl of Islam is supporting the enemies of Allāh...
Included in the first category are also attending gatherings in which the rulings of Allah and the rulings of His Messenger are opposed, judgment is made according to the laws of the Franks, the Christians, and those who abolish or reject the truth, and one witnesses mockery of the rulings of Islam and its people.”
4. Takfir of Judges of Constitution and Man-Made Laws
Shaykh ʿAbd al-Laṭīf Āl ash-Shaykh writes in response to Muḥammad ibn ʿAjlān:
❝As for you permitting seeking aid from them [the mushrikīn] — the dispute is not [only] regarding this particular issue, but rather in appointing them, bringing them, and establishing them in an Islamic land wherein they destroy the symbols of Islām, the foundations of the religion, and the principles (ʾuṣūl) and branches (furūʿ) of the religion.
Among their leaders [of the mushrikīn who are brought in] there exists a law and a ṭāġhūt that they have established to judge between the people concerning blood, wealth, and other matters — opposing and contradicting the revealed texts (nuṣūṣ).
مسلم retweeted
Quick question to the Individual @WajdiAkkari is the individual below to you, your ignorant Muslim brother who can’t be takfired, until proof is established and conditions are fulfilled and this can only be done by the scholars, and he remains upon Islām till this is done . A simple yes. Or a no.
