John Smith (@Flyingterrapin) profile picture

Betting Fraud List: @koolade @fusionbetss

Joined September 2026
Photo by John Smith (@Flyingterrapin)Photo by John Smith (@Flyingterrapin)
Rankings: Your best team is to good to be a mid major and over half your conference is in the top 15 teams out of the 280 something teams outside the power conferences. But we are going to group you with them anyway cause we aren’t sure what we are doing 😂
The PAC-12 isn’t a mid major, nice try though.
23
This guy really was in a room with Pat Mcafee and was the dumbest person in the room…
you could not waterboard this information out of me
25
Always happy to trigger the low IQ and the confused. Usually putting them in their place with facts gets their panties in a wad.
I think we have a new worst PAC 12 account
2
60
Gotta love when they take the bait and expose themselves. “He Won the battle but lost the war” lmaoo
We never played any NAIA team, at least know what you’re talking about before talking shit. Couldn’t be less jealous you just lost to San Diego
1
35
Lost 40 units at once? Ya idc what you hit when you are missing this no way you are profitable
#UFC333 : ALL EYEZ ON EV 21U - Evloev -105 1U - Evloev ITD +550 4.36U - Evloev & Van (331) +229 1U - Evloev, Temirov +3.5, & Chopurov -3.5 +258 1U - Evloev, Lucindo, 49ers ml (MNF) +205 1U - Evloev, Yakhyaev, 49ers -5.5 (MNF) +259 1U - Evloev & Allen (FN) +249 1U - Evloev, Smith & Un 1.5 Rd (332), and Wint & Doesn’t start Rd 3 +339 1U - Evloev & Pico +225 1U - Evloev & Magomedov +251 1U - Evloev & Yan +221 .5U - Evloev +5.5, Yan, Temirov +3.5, Volkov, Pico, Magomedov, Chopurov -3.5, & Lucindo -3.5 +3731 .5U - Yan, Temirov +3.5, Volkov, Pico, Magomedov, Chopurov -3.5, & Lucindo -3.5 +2636 1U - Yan ITD +390 1U - Pico -3.5 +105 1.18U - Volkov -118 1U - Steele Doesn’t Go, Lucindo, Chopurov, Yakhyaev, Vagaev Ov 2.5 Rd +232 1U RR BY 3 ($5), 4 ($5), & 5 ($25) +515 Evloev +5.5, Yan -5.5, Temirov +3.5, Chopurov -3.5, & Lucindo -3.5 1U RR BY 2&3 +4403 Evloev ITD, Yan ITD, & Volkov Dec
9
My biggest issue is this is the exact wording books use to spread bet rounds. Word for word, and based on English the language it’s in, this describes spread betting as I’ve said
I understand the thought process, because at first glance it looks like you need a 10-8, but each round has up to 30 points available. Thats why it’s 30-27, 30-27, 30-27 for unanimous decision for example. So in his bet he needs Abus to win by two. 10-9, 10-9 and 10-9. 30-27 r1.
1
38
I appreciate how you approached this calmly,however each round really only has 10 points available as at the end of the day the judges scores are compiled to make 1 final score with the winner with a max 10 points
I understand the thought process, because at first glance it looks like you need a 10-8, but each round has up to 30 points available. Thats why it’s 30-27, 30-27, 30-27 for unanimous decision for example. So in his bet he needs Abus to win by two. 10-9, 10-9 and 10-9. 30-27 r1.
21
Well then, I guess G money is retarted
This quoted post is unavailable.
15