FX Trader & Crypto Investor.
Amsterdam, Nederland
Joined August 2016
- Tweets572
- Following56
- Followers202
- Likes572
🪄 retweeted
Cheering for a 20M burn? 😂
I never said it's big. I said it shows PoV is still running, and that's what burned tokens on chain every day show. You're arguing against something I didn't say.
Billions were minted, I've never denied that. The team published why: more client adoption, so PoV needs room to scale. A big mint isn't the same as a big dump, and that's the part you keep skipping.
Where's the proof they sold it? A wallet, a sale, the proceeds. I'm still waiting 🤣
Four emojis and a name aren't an argument. Every time I bring facts, the only thing left is insults.
🪄 retweeted
“Touching grass in jail” and “the rest of the team disappeared” is a strong claim.
If that were actually true it would show up somewhere outside the same circle of accounts repeating it to each other. Right now it’s just the usual story being told while the company stays quiet on purpose.
Silence was already the plan they said was coming. Treating every month of it as proof the whole thing is already over is just deciding the ending before the quiet period ends.
🪄 retweeted
Most people don't know this about $VRA.
The CEO, Mark Firth, spent 8 years as Director and General Counsel AMEA at Prosus Group.
Prosus is the 49th most valuable company in the world with a $400B+ market cap. They own ~23% of Tencent, the biggest game publisher on earth with 1.3 billion WeChat users.
Firth personally oversaw hundreds of millions in digital advertising investments across the UAE and AMEA region.
He left that position to become CEO of $VRA.
Now here's what most people miss:
Prosus is not known for community management. They're known for silent, long term investments that deliver enormous returns.
Mark Firth brings exactly that culture to $VRA.
The silence isn't a red flag. It's his DNA.
And in 2024 he said it himself: Mission > noise.
Watch what happens when the mission is complete. 💯
🪄 retweeted
There is no joy without pain. Pain carves a ravine in your heart.
And it’s only the ravine that fills with joy.
Without pain, with a smooth undamaged heart, joy splashes off like water off a duck’s back.
There is no light without dark.
🪄 retweeted
A mailbox? 😂 No photo, no address, no building name, no proof you were even there. Just "trust me bro, I was in Dubai". Anyone can type that sheep.
If a closed door and a story count as proof, then I can say I visited and saw a full office. Do you believe that too?
And let's say you actually did go. An office door tells you nothing about how a company runs. The Khaleej Times partnership and the UAE Ad Exchange were covered by the publisher and the trade media, not by a mailbox.
Post the photo. Post the address. Until then it's one more story with nothing behind it 🤣
🪄 retweeted
10 seconds of research and you posted AI summaries. That’s not a court document.😂🐑
Those screenshots still only name Svetlana A. and Robert H. for the 2021 period. Mark Firth is nowhere in them. Same as before.
And the patent part is wrong. Robert H is the inventor, not the current owner. The PoV patents were assigned to VeraViews FZ-LLC. Check the public patent records. He doesn’t hold them anymore.
Still an open investigation. Still no verdict. Lawyers still deny it. You just recycled the same allegation in AI form and called it research.
🪄 retweeted
It isn’t a scam just because you bought near the top and lost money.
A lot of people bought $VRA around the 2021 ATH and got absolutely destroyed afterwards. VRA is down massively from its peak, but that kind of collapse wasn’t unique to VRA, the 2022 crypto winter destroyed entire sectors, with some major DeFi tokens losing up to 95% and the total crypto market falling more than 60%.
And honestly, I never understood the “strongest community” narrative either. From what I saw, the community spent a huge amount of time begging the team to make changes, while at the same time getting angry whenever the team actually changed something.
Most people weren’t defending the project itself, they were defending their bags.
When the price goes up, everyone is a genius. When it crashes, suddenly the team are “liars” and it was all a scam.
Losing money sucks. I get that. But your entry price and your portfolio loss aren’t evidence of fraud.
You can hate VRA. You can regret buying it. You can walk away.
But don’t rewrite the entire story just because the chart went against you.
🪄 retweeted
Your first claim was: “there’s no evidence the company is functioning.”
I answered that claim. On chain mint/burn shows the PoV infrastructure is still being operated. Renewed SSL on live VeraViews / NADeX domains shows the sites are still being maintained. A dead company does not keep those running.
Now you changed it to: “that isn’t revenue.”
Correct. I never said it was revenue. I said it is evidence the operation is still live. Those are two different things.
And honestly, whether VeraViews exact revenue is public isn't for random accounts on X to determine either way, that's private company financials, most B2B companies don't publish real time revenue figures, that's completely normal outside crypto too.
🪄 retweeted
That's not evidence, that's a chain of assumptions where each step just asserts the next without proof. The UAE update is from June 2025, that's a year ago, not "years ago" like you're implying to make it sound stale.
On the supply increase, here's exactly what $VRA
stated: In light of accelerating client adoption across Web2 and Web3, landmark progress, and major VeraViews product milestones, the Verasity Foundation has authorized an increase in the maximum supply of VRA to support long term scalability. This adjustment accommodates upcoming PoV activities, ad stack operations, and future demand.
Think about what that actually implies. A dilution that large wasn't random, it was scaled to match client adoption. Which means there's very likely a far bigger client base behind the scenes than what we can currently see publicly, we only know a fraction of the confirmed names, Khaleej Times, IAB MENA, industry press, all independently verified, not just VRA's own marketing.
If the supply expansion was sized for that level of growth, the actual client list is probably much larger than the community assumes. And the uncapped supply everyone's crying about? Think about the alternative. A hard cap with a rapidly growing client base means PoV eventually hits a wall it can't scale past. That's exactly the kind of rigid design that leads to a $LUNC style collapse, a system breaking under its own success. Uncapped function tied supply isn't the risk. A fixed cap forced onto real growing infrastructure is.
And "Nothing has happened because no one's getting paid because they're out of business" is three unproven claims stacked into one sentence. Still zero wallet trail, zero court filing, zero regulator statement behind any of it.
🪄 retweeted
No, the OGs didn't lose fortunes because they "trusted CMC." They lost because we're in a brutal bear market where almost every altcoin from 2021 is down 90%+ from its ATH. $ADA, $FET, $ICP, $BCH, $FIL, all of them. That's the market cycle, not a CMC conspiracy.
ethereum:0xf411903cbc70a74d22900a5de66a2dda66507255 is down more specifically because people like you don't understand how supply mechanics work, mix up total supply with circulating supply and then scream "scam" with zero actual proof. Every single time.
Unfortunately 90% of people in this space act exactly like you, react on emotion, skip the research, and blame everyone but themselves when it goes wrong. That's precisely why only a small percentage ever actually succeed in crypto, or in any business for that matter. Conviction and actual understanding separate the two.
🪄 retweeted
Before you panic over this screenshot, look at the left side. See those timestamps? 8h, 8h, 5h, 4h. The guy literally numbered them 1, 2, 3 in reverse order to make it look like a story. That is your first red flag right there.
Now let me break down what you are actually looking at.
That 600M mint from the Null Address is not new VRA hitting the market. Those are PoV Marker tokens. They are non-tradeable backend tokens the smart contract creates for Proof of View ad verification. CMC even says straight up they cannot be traded. Nobody is dumping anything.
The Verasity Hot Wallet is a custodial wallet with over 350,000 users. It holds funds for all of them. So when any of those users withdraws their VRA to Gate or MEXC, it comes out of that exact wallet. That is not the team selling. That is just how a custodial wallet works. Binance does this. Coinbase does this. Every single exchange does this.
And the USDT going back in? VeraWallet does not even support USDT deposits, so this is exchange settlements and operational revenue flowing back into the business wallet. Completely routine for an adtech company.
This screenshot shows a custodial wallet doing exactly what it is supposed to do. Nothing more. Posting this as evidence of insider selling without understanding the basics of how custodial wallets work is either pure ignorance or straight up intentional FUD. $VRA
🪄 retweeted
Based on recent community discussion, a few points need to be stated clearly.
The airdrop is happening and it will be meaningful. This is not a symbolic distribution of a tiny percentage of supply. A SUBSTANTIAL portion of the total $PLRL supply is being considered. Final tokenomics and allocation are still being finalized, pending (1) a complete VeraWallet user summary report and (2) the completion of work from our contracted specialists.
The framework for the airdrop is in active design. A range of variables are being considered as part of that model, including account age, balances, and activity. The core intent is to ensure the framework rewards our community in a fair and meaningful way.
This is not something to be rushed. This is meant to be a defining starting point for PLRL... and that means getting the structure right, not just pushing something out quickly. We’re designing an airdrop that rewards and recognizes our community and a token economy that stands the test of time.
The PLRL Content Marketplace is powered by $PLRL. Still, the marketplace runs on Verasity’s video rails: the PLRL Player uses the same core technology as VeraPlayer, which supports ad monetization. That means ads served through marketplace content can flow into Verasity-level revenue. Over time, a portion of that ad revenue can be allocated to supply reduction programs across both ecosystems ( $PLRL and $VRA ).
$VRA remains the backbone of our video ecosystem. We are in active discussions with CEXs and partners to expand market access, while also progressing toward on-chain expansion via tier 1 DEX venues. We are exploring DEX integrations that can support future on-chain functionality and additional $VRA and $PLRL airdrops for a broader audience, however the priority right now is VeraWallet users.
Regarding so-called filler posts, they serve a purpose. Consistent activity maintains algorithmic reach. Without reach, major announcements lose impact. This is deliberate.
Claims that Verasity is finished or disengaged are false. The company is moving forward with $VRA and Proof of View at the core, while building a B2C ecosystem designed to reward creators and holders through a new token with a clearly defined, hard-capped token model. That foundation starts with well-structured tokenomics and a historic airdrop, currently being finalized by a highly capable team with deep experience in the space.
Onwards.